Bug#1105933: ITP: libcrypt-sysrandom-perl -- Perl interface to system randomness

2025-05-17 Thread gregor herrmann
Package: wnpp Owner: gregor herrmann Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org * Package name: libcrypt-sysrandom-perl Version : 0.007 Upstream Author : Leon Timmermans * URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Crypt-SysRa

Bug#1105936: ITP: libcrypt-sysrandom-xs-perl -- Perl interface to system randomness, XS version

2025-05-17 Thread gregor herrmann
Package: wnpp Owner: gregor herrmann Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org * Package name: libcrypt-sysrandom-xs-perl Version : 0.009 Upstream Author : Leon Timmermans * URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Crypt-Sy

Re: Question about splitting a source package with an epoch

2025-05-17 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2025-05-16 Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > Soren Stoutner writes: >> On Thursday, May 15, 2025 3:56:50 PM Mountain Standard Time Nicholas D >> Steeves >> wrote: >>> "adjusting" the epoch also requires discussion, and consensus, on -devel >> As far as I know, nobody is proposing adding or adjus

Re: Question about splitting a source package with an epoch

2025-05-17 Thread Holger Levsen
hi, seriosuly, I would not bother about the epoch, and just live with it. iirc 10% of the archive has an epoch, so meh. Removing over two releases is risky and errorprone, eg. you need to make sure not to reuse versions etc pp. An epoch might be a bit ugly, but overall it's completly harmless.