Re: Bug reports for Uploaders (was: Re #397761: bugs.debian.org: please forward bug reports to Uploaders also)

2025-03-02 Thread Maytham Alsudany
On Mon, 2025-03-03 at 01:06 +0800, Blair Noctis wrote: > In the current version of the PTS, subscribing to a package means > either a. after logging in, clicking the Subscribe button on > tracker.debian.org/pkg/foo, and optionally changing topics > ("keywords"); b. with devscripts installed, runnin

Re: Misconfigured bookworm upgrades

2025-03-02 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2025-02-28 20:24:27 +0900, Simon Richter wrote: > Hi, > > On 2/28/25 19:57, Colin Watson wrote: > > > But seeing two users who seem to have their systems configured this way > > makes me wonder what's going on.  Does anyone know of documentation > > somewhere that recommends configuring stable

Bug#1099367: ITP: rest-server -- High performance HTTP server for Restic's REST backend API

2025-03-02 Thread Martina Ferrari
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Martina Ferrari * Package name: rest-server Version : 0.13.0-1 Upstream Author : The restic backup program * URL : https://github.com/restic/rest-server * License : BSD-2-clause Programming Lang: Go Description :

Re: Bug reports for Uploaders (was: Re #397761: bugs.debian.org: please forward bug reports to Uploaders also)

2025-03-02 Thread NoisyCoil
Hi all, I am in strong favor of 1., letting BTS forward to Uploaders. I'm Uploader for a few tens of (team-maintained) packages, most of which I don't particularly care about since I only introduced them as dependencies, and I'm not going to subscribe to all of them. Still, I do feel responsi

Re: Bug reports for Uploaders (was: Re #397761: bugs.debian.org: please forward bug reports to Uploaders also)

2025-03-02 Thread Marco d'Itri
I will just note that I have been a Debian Developer for almost 30 years, and a few months after I started maintaining varnish and other related packages I am still not sure if I did everything needed to receive one and only one copy of new bug reports. So I would welcome some rationalization in

Re: Bug reports for Uploaders (was: Re #397761: bugs.debian.org: please forward bug reports to Uploaders also)

2025-03-02 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Blair Noctis (2025-03-02 18:06:49) [...] > Dan Armstrong (don) wontfix'd it after stating that, quote: > > > If the maintainer is not given as a mailing list, then the uploaders > > should all subscribe to the PTS for a given package. [...] > I added that a. team maintenance means hundreds

Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters

2025-03-02 Thread Mario Limonciello
On 3/2/25 12:27, Marc Haber wrote: On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 01:39:11AM +0800, Blair Noctis wrote: I installed mutt and tried to reply to that email, and mutt showed me the Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 source. I'm not sure if that's what you saw. If you saw the decoded text, I copied it in

Bug#1099341: ITP: hyprgraphics -- Lightweight C++ Graphics Utility Library for Hyprland

2025-03-02 Thread Carl Keinath
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Carl Keinath X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: hyprgraphics Version : 0.1.2 Upstream Contact: vaxerski * URL : https://github.com/hyprwm/hyprgraphics * License : BSD-3-Clause Programming Lang:

Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters

2025-03-02 Thread Marc Haber
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 01:39:11AM +0800, Blair Noctis wrote: I installed mutt and tried to reply to that email, and mutt showed me the Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 source. I'm not sure if that's what you saw. If you saw the decoded text, I copied it into vim and vim seems to wrap it just fi

Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters

2025-03-02 Thread Marc Haber
On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 21:14:54 +0800, Blair Noctis wrote: >Open source webmails also exist. "When you're 10 out of 10 but it's your CVSS score". Greetings Marc -- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Maila

Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters

2025-03-02 Thread Blair Noctis
On 03/03/2025 01:08, Andrea Pappacoda wrote: Hi Blair, On Sun Mar 2, 2025 at 2:00 PM CET, Blair Noctis wrote: FWIW, I've enabled format=flowed after learning it in this thread, hopefully also giving those who would rather wrap some freedom (as to let it reflow, which effectively means to wrap,

Re: Bug reports for Uploaders

2025-03-02 Thread Marc Haber
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 01:06:49AM +0800, Blair Noctis wrote: 3. Add the option to subscribe to a package on BTS This would at least allow people who don't/wouldn't use PTS to receive new bug reports for packages they care about. PTS is a separate service that happens to forward BTS bug report

Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters

2025-03-02 Thread Blair Noctis
On 02/03/2025 18:12, Marc Haber wrote: (...) I am positively surprised that so many people in Debian still use mutt (it's by far the most efficient way to handle large amounts of e-mail including mailing lists"), so we need to cater for the fact that e-mails are written in an entirely different s

Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters

2025-03-02 Thread Andrea Pappacoda
Hi Blair, On Sun Mar 2, 2025 at 2:00 PM CET, Blair Noctis wrote: FWIW, I've enabled format=flowed after learning it in this thread, hopefully also giving those who would rather wrap some freedom (as to let it reflow, which effectively means to wrap, or not). Yeah, this email has been sent wit

Bug reports for Uploaders (was: Re #397761: bugs.debian.org: please forward bug reports to Uploaders also)

2025-03-02 Thread Blair Noctis
Dear -devel, Way back in 2006 (19 years ago), #397761 was submitted to request for BTS to forward bug reports also to the Uploaders. Dan Armstrong (don) wontfix'd it after stating that, quote: If the maintainer is not given as a mailing list, then the uploaders should all subscribe to the PTS

Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters

2025-03-02 Thread Andrea Pappacoda
Il giorno sab 1 mar 2025 alle 09:48:36 +01:00:00, Timo Röhling ha scritto: * Soren Stoutner [2025-02-28 10:53]: Format=flowed is being entirely driven by the belief that “We really want the sending MUA to wrap text, but it creates horrible problems, so here is a cludge to work around it.” Q

Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters

2025-03-02 Thread Stephan Verbücheln
Wrapping at 72 is intentional to allow a few levels of quotations. That is where the slightly different numbers come from. The hard limit is 80 because of the 80x24 terminal convention. Regards signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters

2025-03-02 Thread Blair Noctis
On 01/03/2025 16:48, Timo Röhling wrote: * Soren Stoutner [2025-02-28 10:53]: (...) https://www.fastmail.com/blog/format-flowed/ Only a webmail provider can bitch about the complexity of text wrapping and then proceed to recommend HTML, which is even more complex to render and even more dif

Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters

2025-03-02 Thread Marc Haber
On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 09:00:21PM +0800, Blair Noctis wrote: FWIW, I've enabled format=flowed after learning it in this thread, hopefully also giving those who would rather wrap some freedom (as to let it reflow, which effectively means to wrap, or not). It's a bitch to reply to in mutt/vim.

Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters

2025-03-02 Thread Blair Noctis
On 01/03/2025 01:30, tho...@goirand.fr wrote: On Feb 27, 2025 12:02, Blair Noctis wrote: actually struggle to read the hard-wrapped-at-80-then-wrapped-again text. The standard for email is 74 chars, not 80... It's a rant. The actual number didn't matter. But then again, I thought it's 80,

Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters

2025-03-02 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Marc Haber (2025-03-02 11:12:18) > On Sat, 1 Mar 2025 09:48:36 +0100, Timo Röhling > wrote: > >* Soren Stoutner [2025-02-28 10:53]: > >>Format=flowed is being entirely driven by the belief that “We really > >>want the sending MUA to wrap text, but it creates horrible problems, so > >>he

Re: Change the expectation that emails should wrap at 80 characters

2025-03-02 Thread Marc Haber
On Sat, 1 Mar 2025 09:48:36 +0100, Timo Röhling wrote: >* Soren Stoutner [2025-02-28 10:53]: >>Format=flowed is being entirely driven by the belief that “We really >>want the sending MUA to wrap text, but it creates horrible problems, so >>here is a cludge to work around it.” >I believe the ide

Bug#1099320: ITP: mkdocs-get-deps -- MkDocs extension that infers required PyPI packages

2025-03-02 Thread Carsten Schoenert
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Carsten Schoenert X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: mkdocs-get-deps Version : 0.2.0 Upstream Contact: Oleh Prypin * URL : https://github.com/mkdocs/get-deps * License : MIT Programming Lang: P