Quoting Marc Haber (2025-03-02 11:12:18)
> On Sat, 1 Mar 2025 09:48:36 +0100, Timo Röhling <roehl...@debian.org>
> wrote:
> >* Soren Stoutner <so...@debian.org> [2025-02-28 10:53]:
> >>Format=flowed is being entirely driven by the belief that “We really 
> >>want the sending MUA to wrap text, but it creates horrible problems, so 
> >>here is a cludge to work around it.”
> >I believe the idea is more like "We want the receiving MUA to do the 
> >line wrapping, but we do not want to break MUAs which cannot do it 
> >(yet)."
> 
> I am positively surprised that so many people in Debian still use mutt
> (it's by far the most efficient way to handle large amounts of e-mail
> including mailing lists"), so we need to cater for the fact that
> e-mails are written in an entirely different software (an "editor"¹)
> than it is consumed in.

Good point!


> ¹ to make it harder, the combination between mail reader and editor
> multiplies. That was worse back when we had more than one
> console-based mail reader.

Not sure I follow your remark about "more than one console-based mail
reader" as something of the past.  Previously in this thread I noticed
aerc mentioned,  personally I use alot and might migrate to meli, all of
which are console-based MUAs (and all three arguably better integrated
with notmuch, for those interested in that).

 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
 * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature

Reply via email to