Re: how to fix lintian error: library-not-linked-against-libc

2025-01-29 Thread Russ Allbery
Ahmad Khalifa writes: > Instead, lintian should alert that some symbols are "unversioned". The problem is that unversioned symbols are often correct. For one, not every shared library uses symbol versioning; we may want them all to use symbol versioning, and certainly way more of them do today,

Re: support of 7z archives ?

2025-01-29 Thread Salvo Tomaselli
> but 7z was able to unpack it It was able to unpack the initial part that you downloaded, but not the ending part that you didn't download. So the build or the binary result wouldn't have worked anyway. Better to fail if the file is corrupt. Best -- Salvo Tomaselli "Io non mi sento ob

Re: how to fix lintian error: library-not-linked-against-libc

2025-01-29 Thread Ahmad Khalifa
On 29/01/2025 00:01, Russ Allbery wrote: Ahmad Khalifa writes: On 28/01/2025 22:28, Sam Hartman wrote: "Russ" == Russ Allbery writes: Russ> recollection (it's been a *lot* of years so I'm hoping I'm Russ> getting this right) is that this interfered with proper Russ> symbo

Bug#1094647: ITP: klutshnik -- store encrypted OPAQUE-password protected information online

2025-01-29 Thread Joost van Baal-Ilić
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Joost van Baal-Ilić * Package name: klutshnik Upstream Author : Stefan Marsiske * URL : https://github.com/stef/klutshnik * License : GPLv3 Programming Lang: Python, C Description : store encrypted OPAQUE-password protected

Re: Bug#1091394: nproc: add new option to reduce emitted processors by system memory

2025-01-29 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 12:24:40PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote: > We already have around 2000 source packages requiring devscripts > (mostly as it is a dependency of gem2deb). So while I was originally > favouring a new binary package, I lack arguments against devscripts > now. It turns out gem2deb

Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian

2025-01-29 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Andreas Tille (2025-01-29 15:06:15) > Am Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 01:06:00AM +0100 schrieb gregor herrmann: > > The alternative -- and that's what we did in pkg-perl -- is to have > > the Janitor just commit to our repos instead of filing merge > > requests: > > https://salsa.debian.org/janitor

Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian

2025-01-29 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 01:06:00AM +0100 schrieb gregor herrmann: > The alternative -- and that's what we did in pkg-perl -- is to have > the Janitor just commit to our repos instead of filing merge > requests: > https://salsa.debian.org/janitor-team/janitor.debian.net/-/blob/master/k8s/policy.conf

Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections?

2025-01-29 Thread Guillem Jover
On Thu, 2025-01-23 at 17:06:04 -0800, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > Current https://dep-team.pages.debian.net/deps/dep14/ states that the > default Debian branch name is 'debian/latest': > > > In Debian this means that uploads to unstable and experimental should be > > prepared either in > > the debia

Bug#1094630: ITP: qtlomiri-appmenutheme -- Qt platform theme for exported application menus to Lomiri

2025-01-29 Thread Mike Gabriel
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mike Gabriel X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: qtlomiri-appmenutheme Version : 0.66 Upstream Contact: UBports developers * URL : https://gitlab.com/ubports/development/core/qtlomiri-appmenutheme/ * Lic

Re: Bug#1091394: nproc: add new option to reduce emitted processors by system memory

2025-01-29 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Niels, On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 06:36:24PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > Putting the scripts into `devscripts` package would imply that `devscripts` > becomes part of the `bootstrap essential` set of packages. I am not sure the > `devscripts` maintainers are interested in that, because it implie

Re: Bug#1091394: nproc: add new option to reduce emitted processors by system memory

2025-01-29 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Ángel, On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 01:14:04AM +0100, Ángel wrote: > The script looks good, and easy to read. It wouldn't be hard to > translate it to another language if needed to drop the python > dependency (but that would increase the nloc) thank you for the detailed review. I also picked up Ju