On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 12:24:40PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote: > We already have around 2000 source packages requiring devscripts > (mostly as it is a dependency of gem2deb). So while I was originally > favouring a new binary package, I lack arguments against devscripts > now.
It turns out gem2deb doesn't really need to depend on devscripts, and recommending is enough for what is expected. devscripts is needed for creating source packages with gem2deb, but not to actually build those packages. I am demoting it to Recommends: in the next upload of gem2deb, and this should shave a few seconds off from package builds that depend on gem2deb. I have no opinion on where to put the nproc on steroids script, though.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
