Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: xir
Version : 1.3.2
Upstream Author : Jian Weng
* URL : https://github.com/Xilinx/Vitis-AI.git
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: C++
https://yro.slashdot.org/story/21/07/05/2155212/open-source-audio-editor-audacity-has-become-spyware
---
crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Henry-Nicolas Tourneur
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: librem5-flash-image
Version : 0.0+git20210705
Upstream Author : Guido Günther
* URL : https://source.puri.sm/Librem5/librem5-flash-image
* Licens
Simon, et al,
Thank you for your excellent feedback!
On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 at 10:40:28 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Jul 2021 at 02:30:00 -0500, Daniel Lewart wrote:
> > Comparing important/required/standard packages between
> > Buster and Bullseye, I noticed some inconsistencies.
> W
On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 02:09:36PM +0200, Mathieu Parent (Debian) wrote:
> > Do you have plans to support publishing builds only if they've produced
> > bit by bit identical results on several builders? IOW, do you plan to
> > support reproducible builds? :)
>
> There is no specific support for re
On Mon, 2021-07-05 at 11:02 +, M. Zhou wrote:
> Supporting multiple ISA variants based on ld.so means a
> multiple of the current package size.
Apart from the -cc2-dbgsym package those seem fine to multiply,
especially since the intended users probably have lots of disk space.
There is also t
Le lun. 5 juil. 2021 à 11:46, Holger Levsen a écrit :
>
> Hi Mathieu,
Hi Holger,
> On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 10:37:31AM +0200, Mathieu Parent (Debian) wrote:
> > [2]: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/packages/debian_repository/
>
> thanks, this looks nice and simple!
Thanks.
> Do you have plans t
Hi Hunter
On 2021/07/05 05:50, Hunter Wittenborn wrote:
> In combination with some thoughts that have been said here, as well as
> from a branding perspective of what is currently the DUR, I think I'm
> going to change the naming for the project.
>
> I'll be changing it to be called the "makedeb
On Mon, 2021-07-05 at 02:09 +, Paul Wise wrote:
On Sun, Jul 4, 2021 at 11:20 AM Mo Zhou wrote:
> (2) use the "hardware capabilities" feature of ld.so(8)
...
> Solution (2) will result in very bulky binary packages;
Solution (2) seems like the only option that can be done entirely
within Debian
Hi Mathieu,
On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 10:37:31AM +0200, Mathieu Parent (Debian) wrote:
> [2]: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/packages/debian_repository/
thanks, this looks nice and simple!
Do you have plans to support publishing builds only if they've produced
bit by bit identical results on seve
On Mon, 05 Jul 2021 at 02:30:00 -0500, Daniel Lewart wrote:
> Comparing important/required/standard packages between
> Buster and Bullseye, I noticed some inconsistencies.
We have been in hard freeze for almost 4 months[1], so I don't think
now is necessarily the right time to be changing what is
Le sam. 3 juil. 2021 à 12:11, Simon McVittie a écrit :
>
> On Fri, 02 Jul 2021 at 20:04:45 +0200, Mathieu Parent wrote:
> > On a related topic, I'm currently developing support for Debian
> > repositories in Gitlab (and transitively Salsa).
>
> That's great news - being able to build packages in C
Debian Developers,
Comparing important/required/standard packages between
Buster and Bullseye, I noticed some inconsistencies.
Below are six Bullseye packages that I think should
have Priority: optional, with justifications.
1) Are the justifications valid?
2) If so, should I file one or multip
13 matches
Mail list logo
