Debian Developers, Comparing important/required/standard packages between Buster and Bullseye, I noticed some inconsistencies.
Below are six Bullseye packages that I think should have Priority: optional, with justifications. 1) Are the justifications valid? 2) If so, should I file one or multiple bugs against: * ftp.debian.org * src:bind9 * src:gcc-9 * src:gcc-10 * src:mime-support * src:readline Thank you! Daniel Lewart Urbana, Illinois --- 1) override: bind9-dnsutils:net/optional * Currently net/standard * Justification: Buster dnsutils is net/optional 2) override: bind9-libs:libs/optional * Currently libs/standard * Justification: Debian Policy 2.5 3) override: gcc-9-base:libs/optional * Currently libs/required * Justification: Debian Policy 2.5 * Justification: Buster gcc-7-base is libs/optional 4) override: gcc-10-base:libs/optional * Currently libs/required * Justification: Debian Policy 2.5 * Justification: Buster gcc-8-base is libs/optional 5) override: libreadline8:libs/optional * Currently libs/important * Justification: Debian Policy 2.5 * Justification: Buster libreadline7 is libs/optional 6) override: mime-support:oldlibs/optional * Currently net/standard * Justificatino: Transtional package ###
