Bug#986505: ITPetition: Timnit Gebru & Google: stop taking Google money

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-v...@lists.debian.org Let's make a petition about a google employee Put their name in the subject line and attack them every day for a month stop taking the google money you pathetic hypocrites stop telling us a

Bug#986504: ITPetition: FSFE sacked all women but nobody cared

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-v...@lists.debian.org Matthias Kirschner sacked Susanne Eiswirt and Galia Mancheva when they spoke about wage equality They went public in December 2020 Nobody started a petition against the FSFE fascists www.g

Bug#986503: ITPetition: see the leaked emails about Tagliamonte, Pentagon plot

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-v...@lists.debian.org Paul Tagliamonte betrayed Jacob Appelbaum while working at the White House He sent multiple (leaked) messages on debian-private whinging and whining that he doesn't feel safe How can somebo

Bug#986490: ITP: duf -- Disk Usage/Free Utility

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, francisco.ruvi...@riseup.net * Package name: duf Version : 0.6.2 Upstream Author : Christian Muehlhaeuser * URL

Bug#986489: ITP: sass-stylesheets-bulma -- Sass and CSS framework using flexbox

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonas Smedegaard X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 * Package name: sass-stylesheets-bulma Version : 0.9.2 Upstream Author : Jeremy Thomas * URL : https://github.com/jgth

Re: Tone policing by a member of the community team [Was, Re: Statement regarding Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board]

Le mardi 06 avril 2021 à 11:15:29-0700, Steve Langasek a écrit : > > Asking for de-escalation is not tone-policing. > > > Tone-policing is using the way some people tend to express their > > opinion (generally violently, out of reaction to an attack they suffered > > from) as a way to invalidate t

Re: Tone policing by a member of the community team [Was, Re: Statement regarding Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board]

> Apologies, this is all off-topic for debian-devel Please take it elsewhere, I do not think that this discussion is of any value to the project whatsoever and it should have already ended several posts ago already. -Jonathan

Re: Tone policing by a member of the community team [Was, Re: Statement regarding Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board]

On Tue, 2021-04-06 at 22:07 +0200, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > On this point I disagree because Steve never posted that publicly, So if I sent a private mail "fuck off you piece of shit" as a reply to a message that is okay as long as I don't send it to the public mailing list? Either it's acce

Re: Tone policing by a member of the community team [Was, Re: Statement regarding Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board]

[Apologies, this is all off-topic for debian-devel and I should have set an appropriate MFT from the beginning. Corrected now.] On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 09:59:55AM +0200, Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote: > Firstly, I was notidied via mail that the message was initially private (but > it was not, if I

Re: Tone policing by a member of the community team [Was, Re: Statement regarding Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board]

Le mardi 06 avril 2021 à 21:10:09+0200, Jean-Philippe MENGUAL a écrit : > Some persons consider that "Fuck off, nobody asked you for your shitty > fascist opinion" is not acceptable publicly regardless the > circumstances. On this point I disagree because Steve never posted that publicly, but he a

Re: Tone policing by a member of the community team [Was, Re: Statement regarding Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board]

We disagree here about the definition. But the definition is not the point; the effect is the same: asking "both sides" to "de-escalate" when one party has been subjected to an existential attack by the other, prioritizes "civility" over equity. But considering things differently canot help bu

Re: Tone policing by a member of the community team [Was, Re: Statement regarding Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board]

Den tis 6 apr. 2021 kl 20:15 skrev Steve Langasek : > Transphobia by definition is not civilized and the rules of civilized > discourse do not apply when dealing with individuals who are external to > your civilization. That to me seems like an absolutely extraordinary proposition. The epitome o

Re: Tone policing by a member of the community team [Was, Re: Statement regarding Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board]

Hi Steve, On Tue, 2021-04-06 at 11:15 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > the rules of civilized discourse do not apply when dealing with > individuals who are external to your civilization. Please take your imperialist ideology elsewhere. Thanks, Ansgar

Re: Tone policing by a member of the community team [Was, Re: Statement regarding Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board]

On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 12:47:23PM +0200, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > Le lundi 05 avril 2021 à 15:58:37-0700, Steve Langasek a écrit : > > Hi all, > > After some long thought, I believe this message warrants a public response > > (and discussion). > > The facts are these: > > - an individual

Bug#986466: ITP: masakari-dashboard -- OpenStack Virtual Machine High Availability (VMHA) - dashboard plugin

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: masakari-dashboard Version : 4.0.0~rc1 Upstream Author : OpenStack Foundation * URL : https://opendev.org/openstack/masakari-dashboard * License

Re: Bug#986451: ITP: librem-ec-acpi-dkms -- dkms driver sources for EC ACPI in Purism Librem devices

[ re-posted to bugreport and d-devel - not wrongly to Bastian ] Hi Bastian, Quoting Bastian Blank (2021-04-06 14:22:47) > On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 12:01:58PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Description : dkms driver sources for EC ACPI in Purism Librem devices > > > > The driver librem_

Re: Packages in contrib solely because they allow using non-free software

On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 07:57:10AM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > > another way to answer the question is to find some software similar to the one > that you want to package and see if that software is in Debian main or in > contrib. If it is in main, then at least one DD and FT

Re: Bug#986451: ITP: librem-ec-acpi-dkms -- dkms driver sources for EC ACPI in Purism Librem devices

On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 12:01:58PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Description : dkms driver sources for EC ACPI in Purism Librem devices > > The driver librem_ec_acpi provides Linux kernel support > for the ACPI embedded controller of the following devices: > * Purism Librem 14 laptop

Re: Tone policing by a member of the community team [Was, Re: Statement regarding Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board]

Le lundi 05 avril 2021 à 15:58:37-0700, Steve Langasek a écrit : > Hi all, > > After some long thought, I believe this message warrants a public response > (and discussion). > > The facts are these: > > - an individual who is not part of the Debian community sent me (and other >people) a pr

Bug#986451: ITP: librem-ec-acpi-dkms -- dkms driver sources for EC ACPI in Purism Librem devices

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonas Smedegaard X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 * Package name: librem-ec-acpi-dkms Version : 1.0.0 Upstream Author : Nicole Faerber * URL : https://source.puri.sm/ni

Re: Tone policing by a member of the community team [Was, Re: Statement regarding Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board]

Hi, Firstly, I was notidied via mail that the message was initially private (but it was not, if I understand what you say, and since I read it). I am sorry for this as your thread should have been private and would not have created such situation. I would not have had any feedback if it had b

Re: Realtek RTL8723DE, RTL8821CE, RTL8822BE and RTL8822CE chipsets

On 01.04.21 08:52, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > Can you please list some unsupported chips in addition to these specific > Realtek ones? I was looking for a WIFI USB dongle recently, and I found this site quite useful for determining support status (I'm linking directly to the chipset page, but the

Re: Re: Realtek RTL8723DE, RTL8821CE, RTL8822BE and RTL8822CE chipsets

On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 11:46:34AM +0500, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > > > Can you please list some unsupported chips in addition to these specific > > Realtek ones? > > Bad question. > > Recently I had to choose and buy a USB WiFi adapter suitable for > making a s

Re: Re: Realtek RTL8723DE, RTL8821CE, RTL8822BE and RTL8822CE chipsets

Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > Can you please list some unsupported chips in addition to these specific > Realtek ones? Bad question. Recently I had to choose and buy a USB WiFi adapter suitable for making a software access point. And this is in a semi-rural area, so almost no interference from ne