Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Paul Hardy"
Version: 1.0
Upstream Author: Paul Hardy
URL: http://unifoundry.com/unibetacode
License: GPL 2+, GFDL 1.3+
Programming Language: flex
Description: convert classical Greek and Coptic between Beta Code and Unicode
The unibetacode package contains
On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 15:12 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 20, Guillem Jover wrote:
>
> > > And this means that perl (a libcrypt dependency) would be broken between
> > > 1 and 5 (or maybe 1 and 3): is this ever going to work?
> >
> > Given that this new package is going to replace a part
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 10:47:02AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jul 20, Philipp Kern wrote:
I think it's odd to say "here, I'm packaging up a replacement for your
library, but I'm not going to coordinate with you" when we are preparing
a (somewhat) coherent distribution, so I don't think that
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 02:18:51AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jul 18, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Some day it may replace crypt(3), currently provided by glibc:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_glibc_libcrypt_with_libxcrypt
I tried creating a package which would divert libc's libcrypt
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paride Legovini
* Package name: golang-github-shibukawa-configdir
Version : 0.0~git20170330.e180dbd-1
Upstream Author : Yoshiki Shibukawa
* URL : https://github.com/shibukawa/configdir
* License : MIT
Programming Lang:
Hi,
Just a minor correction/detail (not very related to the core part of
your post, sorry if it feels off-topic)...
2018-07-19 18:06 Lars Wirzenius:
https://blog.liw.fi/posts/2018/07/19/building_debian_packages_in_ci_ick/)
[...]
In the future, that list may be expanded by having builds for sev
Jonathan Dowland writes:
> I think we ought to more concretely determine what changes we wish to
> take place. To do this properly I need to spend more time looking at the
> package in more detail, so what follows is just my initial feelings. I
> welcome feedback. For now I suggest we hash it out
On Jul 20, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > And this means that perl (a libcrypt dependency) would be broken between
> > 1 and 5 (or maybe 1 and 3): is this ever going to work?
>
> Given that this new package is going to replace a part of glibc, it
> will need to behave as if it was part of the pseudo-
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Salvo Tomaselli
* Package name: pysttrafik
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Salvo 'LtWorf' Tomaselli
Name
* URL : https://github.com/ltworf/pysttrafik
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python3
Description : Publi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paride Legovini
* Package name: browsh
Version : 1.4.6
Upstream Author : Thomas Buckley-Houston
* URL : https://www.brow.sh/
* License : LGPL-2.1
Programming Lang: Go
Description : Fully interactive, realtime,
On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 02:18:51 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 18, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > Some day it may replace crypt(3), currently provided by glibc:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_glibc_libcrypt_with_libxcrypt
> I tried creating a package which would divert libc's lib
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 12:44:01PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
I can't help but understand your message as "if you don't agree, you
haven't understood" which I don't find very helpful.
Dmitry is not claiming to disagree; he's stating that he doesn't
understand.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan
Hi Jonathan,
On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 07:47 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 01:34:19PM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> > On Friday, 20 July 2018 12:50:12 AM AEST Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > > Have you read Matthew Vernon's reply to OP in this thread? Does
> > > that not
> > >
On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 13:34 +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> On Friday, 20 July 2018 12:50:12 AM AEST Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > Have you read Matthew Vernon's reply to OP in this thread? Does that not
> > explain it?
>
> Matthew did not convince me. IMHO his explanation is weak as it boils down to
On 18.07.2018 20:38, ju xor wrote:
> Philipp Kern:
>> On 2018-07-18 18:24, ju xor wrote:
>>> Philipp Kern:
Should this live in some kind of tor-* namespace?
>>> no
>> Without any rationale? :(
> i'm not sure what you mean, but in case it helps, here some arguments
> why sbws package is not cal
Package: wnpp
Owner: Lev Lamberov
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: transmission-el
Version : 0.12.1
Upstream Author : Mark Oteiza
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/holomorph/transmission
* License : GPL-3+
Description : Emacs interface to a Transmission sessi
On Jul 20, Philipp Kern wrote:
> I think it's odd to say "here, I'm packaging up a replacement for your
> library, but I'm not going to coordinate with you" when we are preparing
> a (somewhat) coherent distribution, so I don't think that option should
> be discarded. (Unless you have a reasonabl
Matthew Vernon writes:
> We shouldn't need to have numbers of people having to justify why a
> particular thing is offensive before we (as a project) try and fix
> it.
That works if Debian was a non-diverse groups where everyone had similar
views on what is offensive. In that case the maintainer
On 20.07.2018 10:18, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 20, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> Make sure that glibc splits out libcrypt into its own package, have libc6
>> depend on it and then provide libcrypt1? (Because it's really providing
>> libcrypt's ABI from another package.) Versioning might be tricky, tho
On Jul 20, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Make sure that glibc splits out libcrypt into its own package, have libc6
> depend on it and then provide libcrypt1? (Because it's really providing
> libcrypt's ABI from another package.) Versioning might be tricky, though.
At some point glibc will just stop build
On 2018-07-20 02:18, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jul 18, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Some day it may replace crypt(3), currently provided by glibc:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_glibc_libcrypt_with_libxcrypt
I tried creating a package which would divert libc's libcrypt, but it
appears to
21 matches
Mail list logo
