Matthew Vernon writes: > We shouldn't need to have numbers of people having to justify why a > particular thing is offensive before we (as a project) try and fix > it.
That works if Debian was a non-diverse groups where everyone had similar views on what is offensive. In that case the maintainer could just have done whatever or would not have uploaded the package at all. Sadly(?) Debian is too diverse and "we (as a project)" won't agree on what is offensive or where what level of offensive content is okay. In this case I feel like we might as well try to reach a consensus on whether pride parades are a display of sexual depravity, sexual liberation or self-objectification; or skipping that part any trying to agree if and how pride parades should be fixed. The current policy[1] leaves it up to the maintainers to make this judgement and I don't think a discussion on -devel@ will reach a consensus that would take away the responsibility here. Ansgar [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#packages-with-potentially-offensive-content
