[Drpopping -release from CC, they are busy enough]
Dirk,
> [Thomas Lumley] is not listed in DESCRIPTION
He has a copyright attribution in R/read.R IIRC but there may be other
instances and other copyright holders. You would make the reference(s)
in debian/copyright like any other package.
> > c
[Sorry for pressing send to quick in my last posting]
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 09:59:49PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > The passive-aggressive "we won't work on your package, and won't tell you
> > why" is a wee bit annoying.
>
> This is an uncharitable interpretation of the situation. There is no
On 14 October 2017 at 22:00, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
| On Sat, 2017-10-14 at 12:59 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > Bumping this as my mail to ftpmaster went unanswered.
| >
| > Could someone please remind me who to ask about the NEW Queue? It is
| > causing
| > me a FTBFS as I need this Build
On 14 October 2017 at 21:59, Chris Lamb wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| > The passive-aggressive "we won't work on your package, and won't tell you
| > why" is a wee bit annoying.
|
| This is an uncharitable interpretation of the situation. There is no
| deliberate witholding of informatio
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 09:59:49PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> > The passive-aggressive "we won't work on your package, and won't tell you
> > why" is a wee bit annoying.
>
> This is an uncharitable interpretation of the situation. There is no
> deliberate witholding o
Hi,
I'm doing an small mass bug filing against obsolete transitional packages
which are at least marked "dummy transitional" since the jessie release,
though many of them existed already in wheezy. I think it's rather undoubtful
those are normal bugs we want to get rid off.
According to a script
On Sat, 2017-10-14 at 12:59 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Bumping this as my mail to ftpmaster went unanswered.
>
> Could someone please remind me who to ask about the NEW Queue? It is
> causing
> me a FTBFS as I need this Build-Depends for an existing package which
> itself
> has reasonably
Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> The passive-aggressive "we won't work on your package, and won't tell you
> why" is a wee bit annoying.
This is an uncharitable interpretation of the situation. There is no
deliberate witholding of information from you or any other maintainer;
I — and the rest of the FT
On 14 October 2017 at 14:47, James McCoy wrote:
| On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 12:59:10PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > Bumping this as my mail to ftpmaster went unanswered.
| >
| > Could someone please remind me who to ask about the NEW Queue?
| > [...]
| >
| > The passive-aggressive "we
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 12:59:10PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> Bumping this as my mail to ftpmaster went unanswered.
>
> Could someone please remind me who to ask about the NEW Queue?
> [...]
>
> The passive-aggressive "we won't work on your package, and won't tell you
> why" is a wee bi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: r-cran-guerry
Version : 1.6-1
Upstream Author : Michael Friendly, Stephane Dray
* URL : https://cran.r-project.org/package=Guerry
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: GNU R
Description :
Bumping this as my mail to ftpmaster went unanswered.
Could someone please remind me who to ask about the NEW Queue? It is causing
me a FTBFS as I need this Build-Depends for an existing package which itself
has reasonably wide-spread (for an R package) reverse dependencies.
On 12 October 2017
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 10:52:04AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Hi Jörg,
>
> Not related to your question, but:
>
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 08:56:25PM +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> > Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
> > Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut.
> > Statusinformationen w
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Gabriel
* Package name: libqtdbusmock
Version : 0.7
Upstream Author : Pete Woods (https://launchpad.net/~pete-woods)
* URL : https://launchpad.net/libqtdbusmock
* License : LGPL-3
Programming Lang: C++
Descriptio
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 01:54:33PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 10:52:04AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > If you're going to use localisation (which is fine, I do too), then if
> > you're trying to ask for help, please get into the habit of reproducing
> > the bug u
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 09:26:07AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 02:16:36PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > On 10 October 2017 at 14:07, Gert Wollny wrote:
> > > I think nobody would object if you set the flag to -std=c++98 for a
> > > certain package, especially if u
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 10:52:04AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> If you're going to use localisation (which is fine, I do too), then if
> you're trying to ask for help, please get into the habit of reproducing
> the bug under LC_ALL=C:
Unfortunately that doesn't help when you are reporting someth
Hi Jörg,
Not related to your question, but:
On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 08:56:25PM +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> Hello,
>
> today I update my system I got the following messages:
>
> [quote]
> $ sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
> Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
> Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut.
18 matches
Mail list logo
