On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 03:23 +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> btrfs check is a destructive tool, that can attempt repairing btrfs
> filesystem. it should not be run automatically, nor non-interractive,
> nor on each boot.
What source is that information based on?
To my knowledge, and I think I re
On 24 November 2015 at 03:12, Christoph Anton Mitterer
wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 02:51 +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>> This is currently the case for xfs and btrfs, which imho is silly.
> Well sooner or later, btrfs check is declared stable and then I think
> we do want to have regular c
On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 04:12 +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> In fact, btrfs seems to be quite useful already these days...
I meant "btrfs check" ;-)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 02:51 +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> This is currently the case for xfs and btrfs, which imho is silly.
Well sooner or later, btrfs check is declared stable and then I think
we do want to have regular checks (though don't know whether this is
upstream's recommendation).
Hello,
Most filesystems support destructive operations, with a goal to
recover data via some-sort check/repair functionality e.g. btrfs
check/rescue, xfs_repair etc.
Some filesystems also require periodic maintenance calls, e.g.
something like the `harmless' fsck on each mount.
Some filesystems
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Guillem Jover wrote:
> BTW, thanks for doing all this!
>
> In any case this is a heads up to note that the next dpkg upload will
> include the change requested in #805872. If anyone has concerns or
> objections, please bring them up now.
Once it happens, please m
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Noam Preil
* Package name: shatteredpixeldungeon
Version : 0.0.0
Upstream Author : Evan
* URL : https://github.com/00-Evan/shattered-pixel-dungeon-gdx
* License : GPLv3
Programming Lang: Java
Description : A mod o
Hi!
On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 17:32:31 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> As part of the Reproducible Builds effort [0] we added a
> "reproducible/timeless" feature area to dpkg which exports -Wdate-time
> via CPPFLAGS [1].
>
> In our CI infrastructure we enabled that in Spring.
>
> We now think this is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Noam Preil
* Package name: pixeldungeon
Version : 1.0.0
* Upstream Author : Arcnor
* URL : https://github.com/arcnor/pixel-dungeon-gdx
* License : GPLv3
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Traditional roguelike gam
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 08:42:14PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 06:14:43 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
>
> > If it's a “severe violation of Debian policy”, the bug is at least
> > “serious” severity.
> >
> The release team's RC policy decides which policy violations we consid
On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 08:48 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> Julien Cristau writes:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 06:14:43 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> >
> > > If it's a “severe violation of Debian policy”, the bug is at least
> > > “serious” severity.
>
> This is one way that a bug can be determined “S
Julien Cristau writes:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 06:14:43 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
>
> > If it's a “severe violation of Debian policy”, the bug is at least
> > “serious” severity.
This is one way that a bug can be determined “Severity: serious”, by
definition.
In other words: “severe violation
Santiago Vila wrote:
> I've noticed that some packages fail to build from source when built
> using "dpkg-buildpackage -A".
>
> This is not only a violation of policy, but also prevents the package
> from being uploaded in source-only form, as the architecture-independent
> packages are generated
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Emmanuel Bourg
* Package name: maven-deploy-plugin
Version : 2.8.2
Upstream Author : The Apache Software Foundation
* URL : http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-deploy-plugin/
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: J
On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 13:09 -0800, Joshua R. Poulson wrote:
> Sorry, I assume you meant binary-only in context. It was certainly not
> our intent to ask for something like that.
Ah. I'm assuming that there's been a confusion of terminology here. A
binary package in this context is a package that a
Sorry, I assume you meant binary-only in context. It was certainly not our
intent to ask for something like that.
Sorry again, --jrp
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 12:43 -0800, Joshua R. Poulson wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Adam
On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 12:43 -0800, Joshua R. Poulson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Adam D.
> Barratt wrote:
> I assumed that there would have been a discussion - if only
> because
> adding a binary package to stable is a reasonably exceptional
> circums
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> I assumed that there would have been a discussion - if only because
> adding a binary package to stable is a reasonably exceptional
> circumstance - but couldn't find one.
Why would there be a binary-only package for the hyper-v driver
On Sun, 2015-11-22 at 21:53 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-11-22 at 21:34 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2015-11-22 at 20:45 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2015-10-18 at 12:35 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 17 Oct 2015 18:54:51 +0100
> > > > Ben Hutchi
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 06:14:43 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> If it's a “severe violation of Debian policy”, the bug is at least
> “serious” severity.
>
The release team's RC policy decides which policy violations we consider
"severe" in the sense of "gets a serious severity bug".
Cheers,
Julien
Santiago Vila writes:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:29:19AM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > I'd use "severity: serious", just like for a normal FTBFS.
>
> The problem with making them "severity: serious" is that I would be
> deciding on my own that those bugs are RC. Normally, the release team
> deci
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 05:51:44PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > As the number of bugs is going to be greater than ten
>
> Do you have the exact figures? How many packages are affected?
I don't have exact figures yet, but I estimate about 300, more or less.
I considered the source packages ge
On 11/23/2015 10:52 AM, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> I've noticed that some packages fail to build from source when built
> using "dpkg-buildpackage -A".
>
> This is not only a violation of policy, but also prevents the package
> from being uploaded in source-only form, as the architectu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬)"
* Package name: python-pgspecial
Version : 1.2.0
Upstream Author : Amjith Ramanujam
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: python
Description : https://github.com/
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:29:19AM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Santiago Vila , 2015-11-23, 10:52:
> >I've noticed that some packages fail to build from source when built using
> >"dpkg-buildpackage -A".
> [...]
> >I think those are clearly bugs, and they should be reported. The only
> >thing that
* Santiago Vila , 2015-11-23, 10:52:
I've noticed that some packages fail to build from source when built
using "dpkg-buildpackage -A".
[...]
I think those are clearly bugs, and they should be reported. The only
thing that may be unclear is the severity. I would like this to be RC
in some not
Greetings.
I've noticed that some packages fail to build from source when built
using "dpkg-buildpackage -A".
This is not only a violation of policy, but also prevents the package
from being uploaded in source-only form, as the architecture-independent
packages are generated by a dedicated "Arch:
Dear
This is Charles from China. we is a factory-direct and trust-worthy
supplier in tungsten carbide jewelry and ceramic jewelry.
Thank you for your time for reading my email, here is our new product .
please check the pictures and details we have them in stock, if you have
any inter
Package: wnpp
Owner: Ole Streicher
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc:
debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-as...@lists.debian.org,debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: photutils
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Larry Bradley and Brigitta Sipocz
* URL : https://g
29 matches
Mail list logo
