Sorry, I assume you meant binary-only in context. It was certainly not our intent to ask for something like that.
Sorry again, --jrp On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote: > On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 12:43 -0800, Joshua R. Poulson wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Adam D. > > Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote: > > I assumed that there would have been a discussion - if only > > because > > adding a binary package to stable is a reasonably exceptional > > circumstance - but couldn't find one. > > > > Why would there be a binary-only package for the hyper-v drivers and > > daemons in the Linux kernel, even for a cherry pick? > > What do you mean by "a binary-only package"? (Note that I didn't use > that term in the message to which you replied.) > > Regards, > > Adam > > >
