Bug#789622: ITP: netcdf-cxx-legacy -- legacy NetCDF C++ interface

2015-06-22 Thread Ross Gammon
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ross Gammon * Package name: netcdf-cxx-legacy Version : 4.2 Upstream Author : University Corporation for Atmospheric Research/Unidata * URL : http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/ * License : NetCDF Programming L

Bug#789613: ITP: python-os-testr -- Utility wrappers for testrepository for OpenStack projects

2015-06-22 Thread James Page
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: James Page * Package name: python-os-testr Version : 0.1.0 * URL : http://github.com/openstack/os-testr * License : Apache-2 Programming Lang: Python Description : Utility wrappers for testrepository for OpenStack p

Re: Q: Which is suitable "distribution" in changelog for point release?

2015-06-22 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 2015-06-22 14:54, Hideki Yamane wrote: On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 15:41:30 +0200 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Then, which is better: jessie or jessie-proposed-updates? > and {testing,stable,oldstable}-security and {stretch,jessie,wheezy}-security? jessie and jessie-security. Thanks Emilio,

Bug#789601: ITP: python-os-brick -- Library for managing local volume attaches

2015-06-22 Thread James Page
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: James Page * Package name: python-os-brick Version : 0.2.0 * URL : http://github.com/openstack/os-brick * License : Apache-2 Programming Lang: Python Description : Library for managing local volume attaches OpenSt

Re: Allowing both cross building and using an alternative compiler

2015-06-22 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, Wookey wrote: > This is a worthy goal, but I've had long conversations about this, > trying to think up some 'neutral' names which aren't confusing and > have failed. After much hand-wringing I concluded that one might as > well just use the GNU names as we use GNU conventions

Re: Q: Which is suitable "distribution" in changelog for point release?

2015-06-22 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 22/06/15 15:54, Hideki Yamane wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 15:41:30 +0200 > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> Then, which is better: jessie or jessie-proposed-updates? >>> and {testing,stable,oldstable}-security and >>> {stretch,jessie,wheezy}-security? >> >> jessie and jessie-security. > >

Re: Q: Which is suitable "distribution" in changelog for point release?

2015-06-22 Thread Hideki Yamane
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 15:41:30 +0200 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > Then, which is better: jessie or jessie-proposed-updates? > > and {testing,stable,oldstable}-security and > > {stretch,jessie,wheezy}-security? > > jessie and jessie-security. Thanks Emilio, but why? Because I also note th

Re: Q: Which is suitable "distribution" in changelog for point release?

2015-06-22 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 22/06/15 13:43, Hideki Yamane wrote: > On Sun, 21 Jun 2015 23:13:53 +0200 > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> $ dch -r -D jessie >>> dch warning: Recognised distributions are: unstable, testing, >>> stable, >>> oldstable, experimental, >>> {testing-,stable-,oldstable-,

Re: Q: Which is suitable "distribution" in changelog for point release?

2015-06-22 Thread Hideki Yamane
On Sun, 21 Jun 2015 23:13:53 +0200 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > $ dch -r -D jessie > > dch warning: Recognised distributions are: unstable, testing, > > stable, > > oldstable, experimental, > > {testing-,stable-,oldstable-,}proposed-updates, > > {testing,stab

Re: Q: Which is suitable "distribution" in changelog for point release?

2015-06-22 Thread Hideki Yamane
On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 15:10:45 +0800 Paul Wise wrote: > > Also want to know the resource for it. > > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#upload-stable It doesn't say about distribution in changelog, it'd be better to add it. -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henric