On Sun, 21 Jun 2015 23:13:53 +0200
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> wrote:
> > $ dch -r -D jessie
> > dch warning: Recognised distributions are: unstable, testing,
> > stable,
> > oldstable, experimental,
> > {testing-,stable-,oldstable-,}proposed-updates,
> > {testing,stable,oldstable}-security, wheezy-backports,
> > jessie-backports and UNRELEASED.
> > Using your request anyway.
> > dch: Did you see that warning? Press RETURN to continue...
> >
> > I don't see any bugs about not accepting Jessie here and if it weren't
> > deliberate I'd expect older releases to be listed (i.e. it's not just
> > that devscripts hadn't caught up with Jessie yet).
>
> Then please file a bug.
Okay, filed as Bug#789587
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=789587
Then, which is better: jessie or jessie-proposed-updates?
and {testing,stable,oldstable}-security and {stretch,jessie,wheezy}-security?
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/20150622204339.7b2381469d86e173e809e...@debian.or.jp
