Not really. Just use the information from the grunt config to build the single
file javascript using cat. It's a sub-optimal solution because it's a lot of
work for doing something upstream allready did, and we can't run the tests. It
was actually quite easy with jQuery, working with angular and
❦ 16 avril 2015 21:09 +0200, Andreas Noteng :
>> While I still maintain my previous position that concatenated js
>> is DFSG-free, even if it is not what upstream requires, I'm just
>> wondering - what is your .orig.tar.gz? You might not need to repack
>> it if you can concatenate the files with
❦ 17 avril 2015 00:32 +0100, Ian Jackson :
>> Guess I'll have to start over again and figure out how to manually
>> concatenate the separate upstream files into one huge file. I can see
>> how it makes sense, but it also seems like a lot of work for very
>> little gain…
>
> So you propose to man
Marc Haber writes:
> Thankfully, git is by far the best VCS on the market and the vast
> majority of people seem to agree. But imagine the outcry if ten years
> ago Sourceforge had said "our VCS is svn and we don't support anything
> else".
Er, they did, didn't they? I could have sworn that the
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 19:40:21 -0700, Russ Allbery
wrote:
>Iustin Pop writes:
>> I think the VCS agnosticism is actually detrimental in this context.
>> It's much easier for the user when every repo is using the same VCS.
>> And consistency makes it very easy, for example, to refer to commits
>> ac
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:49 AM, João Vanzuita wrote:
> from 0 to 10, what's the importance of this team ?
It is really quite important for bringing new people to Debian.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
Iustin Pop writes:
> I think the VCS agnosticism is actually detrimental in this context.
> It's much easier for the user when every repo is using the same VCS.
> And consistency makes it very easy, for example, to refer to commits
> across projects, to standardise pull/clone workflows, etc.
+1.
Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 17:44:52 Robert Edmonds wrote:
> > * Package name: wrk
> > Version : 4.0.1
> > Upstream Author : Will Glozer
> > * URL : https://github.com/wg/wrk
> > * License : Apache-2.0, BSD-3-Clause
> > Programming Lang: C
> >
On 2015-04-17 10:54:43, Russell Stuart wrote:
> Github has all but
> annihilated SourceForge in the hosting market place, and the stand out
> change is it's UI. That is in spite of SourceForge's impressive mirror
> network and SourceForge being VCS agnostic.
I think the VCS agnosticism is actuall
On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 19:37 +0200, Sven Bartscher wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 09:04:07 -0600
> Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>
> > I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :)
>
> I don't a reason to have gitlab/github/someother git stuff for debian,
> since we already have alioth.
> Maybe someone can enl
Heyya -devel,
If anyone has Python 2 only projects that you need a hand with porting,
we have a brand new list:
https://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/py3porters-devel
This list, within less than 15 hours of my posting the d-d-a mail, has
over 110 people subscribed.
Feed us. Feed
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 670 (new: 3)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 148 (new: 1)
Total number of packages request
Hi,
from 0 to 10, what's the importance of this team ?
att,
On 04/16/2015 08:35 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Dear Developers,
I am happy to announce the creation of the Debian Outreach Team. As
highlighted below in the official delegation, the Outreach Team is
responsible for coordinating Debian
Andreas Noteng writes ("Re: Minified javascripts in packages"):
> Guess I'll have to start over again and figure out how to manually
> concatenate the separate upstream files into one huge file. I can see
> how it makes sense, but it also seems like a lot of work for very
> little gain…
So you pro
Please CC me on all replies, I'm not subscribed to -devel
I'd like to propose a MBF on Python packages that contains a Trove
classifier that's positive Python 3, who's Debian packaging does not
build a Python 3 package.
Which is to say their upstream claims Python 3 support, but we don't
build
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Colin Ian King
* Package name: power-calibrate
Version : 0.01.13
Upstream Author : Colin Ian King
* URL : http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~cking/power-calibrate/
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: C
Description : powe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Den 15. april 2015 11:45, skrev Riley Baird:
> While I still maintain my previous position that concatenated js
> is DFSG-free, even if it is not what upstream requires, I'm just
> wondering - what is your .orig.tar.gz? You might not need to repack
>
On 04/16/2015 09:19 PM, Alexander Alemayhu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 06:15:07PM +0300, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote:
>> I'm not a DD, but I'd suggest to consider "Gogs", too. It's pretty new
>> and unfinished, but potentially is much better than "GitLab", IMHO.
>
> I'm not a DD either but +1 :) I
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 17:11:29 +0200
Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On 16 Apr 2015 7:46 am, "Jérémy Lal" wrote:
> > i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization,
> > where maintainers could be added.
>
> there is: https://github.com/debian
I've already got a bunch of other stuff on
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 06:15:07PM +0300, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote:
>
> I'm not a DD, but I'd suggest to consider "Gogs", too. It's pretty new
> and unfinished, but potentially is much better than "GitLab", IMHO.
>
I'm not a DD either but +1 :) I tried it out awhile back from the try site[0]and
it
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 09:04:07 -0600
Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :)
I don't a reason to have gitlab/github/someother git stuff for debian,
since we already have alioth.
Maybe someone can enlighten me.
Regards
Sven
pgphXmA_4Agbj.pgp
Description: Digitale Signat
> I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :)
Why Gitlab when there's Kallithea? :)
--
Cheers,
Andrew
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, where
> maintainers could be added.
It would probably better to use free tools instead?
http://mako.cc/writing/hill-free_tools.html
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/Paul
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 04:47:19PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> Libdvdcss and ZFS soon in Debian?
> =
>
> We received legal advice from Software Freedom Law Center about the
> inclusion of libdvdcss and ZFS in Debian, which should unblock the
> situation in both
On 04/16/2015 06:09 PM, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>> I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :)
I'm not a DD, but I'd suggest to consider "Gogs", too. It's pretty new
and unfinished, but potentially is much better than "GitLab", IMHO.
Best rega
On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 17:11 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On 16 Apr 2015 7:46 am, "Jérémy Lal" wrote:
> > i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, where
> > maintainers could be added.
>
> there is: https://github.com/debian
>
> > This is a scary pandora box, though :
On 16 Apr 2015 7:46 am, "Jérémy Lal" wrote:
> i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, where
> maintainers could be added.
there is: https://github.com/debian
> This is a scary pandora box, though :)
indeed. it could be nice, but i'd rather avoid it.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :)
Good one Dimitri!
I started to use Gitlab for serious work only recently, and well I love it.
So +1 from me, I volunteer to help out with that.
Cheers!
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotr
I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :)
Which is similar in spirit to ask.debian.net.
PS. Sorry for top reply from mobile phone.
On 16 Apr 2015 7:46 am, "Jérémy Lal" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, where
> maintainers could be added.
>
> This i
Paul Tagliamonte (2015-04-16):
> Background
> ==
>
> Python 2 is scheduled to be EOL'd upstream officially and for good in 2020.
> We're in 2015 now (wow, that went quickly), and keeping our release cadence up
> (3 years a pop) puts Stretch up in 2018, and Buster in 2021.
Wheezy was firs
Quoting Jérémy Lal (2015-04-16 15:45:34)
> i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization,
> where maintainers could be added.
Wouldn't surprise me, but I don't know (not interested).
> This is a scary pandora box, though :)
If you add that remark to appeace those disliking
Hello,
i was wondering if debian had a github account as an organization, where
maintainers could be added.
This is a scary pandora box, though :)
Jérémy.
Please remove me from your distribution list. I am retiring at the end of the
month!
Regards,
April Chapman
Product Manager, Retail Operating Systems/Platform Software
NCR Corporation
office: 770/813-3896
april.chap...@ncr.com | www.ncr.com
NCR Drivers and Patches Support Website:
http
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: murasaki
Version : 1.68.6
Upstream Author : Kris Popendorf
* URL : http://murasaki.dna.bio.keio.ac.jp/wiki/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++, Perl
Description : homology detecti
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015, at 02:38, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:08:32 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo
> >https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-main
> >policy section 2.2.1
> >"packages in main must not require or recommend a package outside of
> >main for compilation or execut
35 matches
Mail list logo
