On Mon, 12 Jan 2015, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>
> > Some texlive-* packages (and perhaps others) have a huge extended
> > description, e.g. more than 1900 lines for texlive-latex-extra!
>
> Sounds like a symptom of bundling lots of CTAN packages in
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Some texlive-* packages (and perhaps others) have a huge extended
> description, e.g. more than 1900 lines for texlive-latex-extra!
Sounds like a symptom of bundling lots of CTAN packages into one
Debian package. Personally I think it would
On 2015-01-11 10:37, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Don Armstrong:
Every extra line is only an extra byte, after all.
Empty lines, however, require three. (Space period LF)
Somebody needed to point that out, of course. In compression they will
most certainly map to a single byte. Yes, this would no
On 01/09/2015 09:03 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> (I am not subscribed to Cc, due to obvious reasons, so please Cc
> me any further *relevant* remarks - I don't care for the rants)
>
> concerning Vincent's email: he mentioned that:
>> but the maintainer disagrees.
> but he did no
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 775123 src:linux
Bug #775123 [general] (no subject)
Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'src:linux'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #775123 to the same values
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions
reassign 775123 src:linux
forcemerge 774436 775123
thanks
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 01:19:35PM -0600, Robert wrote:
> Subject: general: Thinkpad will not wake since Debian 7.8 upgrade, must hard
> boot computer.
> Package: general
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> What led up to
Subject: general: Thinkpad will not wake since Debian 7.8 upgrade, must hard
boot computer.
Package: general
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
What led up to the situation? I upgraded to Deb 7.8 during normal update
What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ine
Hi!
On Sun, 2015-01-11, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On 10 January 2015 at 17:27, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I think fixing translator tools would be an improvement, because it
> > would reduce translator work in other situations too, by chunking the
> > description on long lists (and not necess
You definitely need to see/know about the surrounding context. (it might be
done differently than today, but the need is there).
bye
Joe
Danish
On 10 January 2015 at 17:27, Guillem Jover wrote:
> So, no, "fixing" the "translators tools" is not an option. Whether or
> not texlive-* pac
On 10 January 2015 at 17:27, Guillem Jover wrote:
>
> > So, no, "fixing" the "translators tools" is not an option. Whether or
> > not texlive-* packages are "too long" is a debate I already had with
> > Norbert in the bug report he mentioned. He gave a rationale which
> > doesn't entirely satisfi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Doug Torrance
* Package name: wmcube
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Cezary M. Kruk
* URL : http://linux-bsd-unix.strefa.pl/index.en.html
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: C
Description : spinning 3D object t
Hi,
Don Armstrong:
> Every extra line is only an extra byte, after all.
>
Empty lines, however, require three. (Space period LF)
> It would probably be ideal if there was a better way of indicating which
> latex modules were in each texlive package than currently, but until a
> better method is
On Wed Jan 07 2015 at 11:11:08 AM Javier Fernandez-Sanguino <
j...@computer.org> wrote:
>
> With the upcoming ntopng, will ntop upstream still provide security
> support for previous ntop releases (i.e to version 5.0 which is in testing)
> ?
>
No.
> If upstream is *not* going to provide security
13 matches
Mail list logo