On 09-10-14 02:17, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Oct 2014, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> Thanks for the careful response. And no, as mentioned above, I didn't
>> mean to use dpkg-statoverride itself. dbconfig-common uses debconf and
>> ufc to manage the configuration files. However, dbcon
Control: reassign -1 wnpp
Control: owner -1 debian-si...@free-astro.vinvin.tf
On Jo, 09 oct 14, 01:22:57, debian-si...@free-astro.vinvin.tf wrote:
> Package: siril
> Version: 0.9.0b
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: siril
> Version : 0.9.0b
> Upstream author : Vincent Hourdin
> URL : http
Hey,
On 9 October 2014 05:21, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Mike Gabriel
>
> * Package name: obs-build
> Version : Git snapshot (every commit is a release)
> Upstream Author : Michael Schroeder (https://github.com/mlschroe)
> * URL
On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 09:03:49 +1100, Ben Finney
wrote:
>On that point: It is in poor taste to declare up front that you have no
>intention of helping the free software community (which is what it means
>to release proprietary software), and then in the same message ask that
>same community for help
Hi,
I need some help/advice with bug 759559 [0] . Im not sure if the suggested
patch is the right one for fixing this problem.
Any advice/patches are welcome.
Thanks.
Regards,
Martijn van Brummelen
Debian maintainer libpam-script
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=759559
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Gabriel
* Package name: obs-build
Version : Git snapshot (every commit is a release)
Upstream Author : Michael Schroeder (https://github.com/mlschroe)
* URL : https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-build
* License : GPL
P
Hey Paul,
Thanks for your fast reply!
On 8 October 2014 00:30, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 12:26:07AM -0300, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
> >Hey guys!
>
> And gals!
>
Sure! :-D
> >I'm wondering here... Where are the E19 packages for Debian?! :-P
>
> You tell us!
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tristan Seligmann
* Package name: txjsonrpc
Version : 0.3.1
Upstream Author : Duncan McGreggor
* URL : http://launchpad.net/txjsonrpc
* License : BSD / GPL (need to check why PyPI says GPL)
Programming Lang: Python
De
On Wed, 08 Oct 2014, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Thanks for the careful response. And no, as mentioned above, I didn't
> mean to use dpkg-statoverride itself. dbconfig-common uses debconf and
> ufc to manage the configuration files. However, dbconfig-common checks
> with dpkg-statoverride if the configura
Contacting copyright holder and asking them to release under
GPL or such is not a bad idea.
even if they say no they might consider it in the future.
They will know there is a real use for it.
Else people just buy free-software complying hardware, or better
alternative software that is fully fre
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Mathieu Slabbinck wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone could point me to the best practice way of doing
> this.
Best practice would be to contact the copyright holder and ask them to
convert the software to FLOSS. If they refuse to do so, then try to
find, write or c
You should repent your sins
Thinking proprietary is a sin in the free software community
Making a fully free replacement is a much better way, don't taint your
operating system or kernel!
Might as well change to windows then, because running non-free isn't that bad
eh?
The free software moveme
Brian May writes:
> On 9 October 2014 09:03, Ben Finney wrote:
>
> > On that point: It is in poor taste to declare up front that you have
> > no intention of helping the free software community (which is what
> > it means to release proprietary software), and then in the same
> > message ask tha
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "W. Martin Borgert"
* Package name: python-pyld
Version : 0.6.2
Upstream Author : Digital Bazaar
* URL : http://github.com/digitalbazaar/pyld
* License : BSD 3-clause
Programming Lang: Python
Description : implem
On 9 October 2014 09:03, Ben Finney wrote:
> On that point: It is in poor taste to declare up front that you have no
> intention of helping the free software community (which is what it means
> to release proprietary software), and then in the same message ask that
> same community for help in do
Mathieu Slabbinck writes:
> Currently I use dh_make to set everything up, but to have everything
> legally compliant, I don't think this is the best choice.
What do you mean by “legally compliant”?
If you mean “compliant with Debian packaging policy”, then no,
proprietary software is incompatib
Hi,
Is there somewhere a list of the minimal ISA for each supported Debian
architecture?
For example, for armhf, the answer is here:
https://wiki.debian.org/ArmHardFloatPort#Minimum_CPU_.26_FPU
But I did not find this kind of information for all other Debian
architectures.
The goals is
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:48:22 +0200, Mathieu Slabbinck
wrote:
>Currently I use dh_make to set everything up, but to have everything
>legally compliant, I don't think this is the best choice.
Why not?
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
M
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Willi Mann
* Package name: libsys-meminfo-perl
Version : 0.98
Upstream Author : Sylvain Cresto >
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~scresto/Sys-MemInfo/MemInfo.pm
* License : "same as Perl"
Programming Lang: Perl, C
Desc
On 07-10-14 19:56, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I am trying to come up with a patch against dpkg-statoverride that sets
> the ownership and permissions upon creation, but not upon updates.
OOPS, what a stupid mistake to type. I meant dbconfig-common in the line
above.
@ Henrique de Moraes Holschuh:
Thank
Ian Jackson writes:
> I hope you understand the rest of my mail, in which I said or implied:
> 1. Even if upstream disagrees, it should be obviously why dgit needs
>the dgit git history to have identical contents to the Debian
>packages.
> 2. This dgit requirement is not difficult to wo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Emmanuel Bourg
* Package name: eclipse-aether
Version : 0.9.0.M2
Upstream Author : The Eclipse Foundation
* URL : http://www.eclipse.org/aether/
* License : EPL-1.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Library to
Hi,
I'm creating a .deb installer for Ubuntu which contains a proprietary
binary.
I was wondering if anyone could point me to the best practice way of doing
this.
Currently I use dh_make to set everything up, but to have everything
legally compliant, I don't think this is the best choice.
Any ad
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jerome Benoit
* Package name: singular
Version : 4.0.1
Upstream Author : SINGULAR Team
* URL : http://www.singular.uni-kl.de
* License : GPL-2+, GPL-3+, adhoc
Programming Lang: C, C++, ...
Description : commutati
On 08/10/14 11:47, Guillem Jover wrote:
> I'm thinking that I could also make the code fallback to linprocfs at
> run-time in case the ki_structsize member differs from the size known
> at build time, which would give an additional safe guard, in case the
> above does not hold true.
In that case p
Russ Allbery writes ("Re: dgit and upstream git repos"):
> Ian Jackson writes:
> > On `source code': I think everyone should have the same definition of
> > `source code' for git as for tarballs.
>
> I understand why you feel this way, particularly given the tools that
> you're working on, but th
On Sat, 2014-10-04 at 23:59:25 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 04:45:13 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 22:03:37 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> > > No problem. Does that mean you'd happily revert to using linprocfs?
> >
> > If there's no better option
On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 19:10:47 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 01:55:01 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > > Why?
>
> > Because make does not (yet) pass make variables to $(shell) subshells.
> [...]
> > Try this:
>
> > $ make -f debian/rules DEB_BUILD_O
Hi Cyril,
On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 09:11:24PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> The Debian Installer team[1] is pleased to announce the second beta
> release of the installer for Debian 8 "Jessie".
> ...
thanks for your report and your continuous work on the installer.
I wonder what might be the o
29 matches
Mail list logo
