Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes: > I hope you understand the rest of my mail, in which I said or implied:
> 1. Even if upstream disagrees, it should be obviously why dgit needs > the dgit git history to have identical contents to the Debian > packages. > 2. This dgit requirement is not difficult to work with (in part > because git makes it easy to do stunts). > 3. In particular the dgit git history can still have the upstream git > history as an ancestor, take cherry picks and even merges from > upstream git, etc. Oh, yes, absolutely. I even said basically the same thing in my earlier reply, pointing to gbp import-orig --upstream-vcs-tag, which creates exactly that structure. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/874mvetvy5....@hope.eyrie.org
