On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 09:10:24PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > Looking at the policy again, I think extra is (mis)used quite too
> > often.
>
> Part of the problem could be that dh_make at least at one point (maybe
> still does) put "extra" as defalt Priority in its templates and it
> might've
Hi,
I've been maintaining "official" OpenStack Debian images within the HP
cloud for about 6 months now. Though I've been requested a few times
already where these could be downloaded. The thing is, due to the very
nature of OpenStack, which is completely free software, it doesn't make
much sense
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-keystonemiddleware
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : OpenStack Development Mailing List
* URL : https://github.com/openstack/keystonemiddleware
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming
On 07/17/2014 05:47 AM, Wookey wrote:
> Mostly. I've done a pile recently (40+) (largely autoconf-update bugs)
> and only had one instance of outright hostility
It is my experience as well that, almost everyone is nice and accept
NMU, but there's always a few instances of moronic reactions. I try
On 07/17/2014 06:40 PM, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 07/16/14 17:56, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>
>> BTW, it feels weird that the package build-depends on debhelper when it
>> really is using CDBS. The debian/copyright is also quite wrong, as it
>> doesn't include the copyright notice for the GPL v2 (and
On 07/17/2014 02:29 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Thomas Goirand
>
>> On 07/15/2014 09:42 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
>>> I am not a big fan of the 3.0 (quilt) format because it imposes a patch
>>> system.
>>> In particular, this format does not make much sense when managing the source
>>> packa
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 583 (new: 1)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 133 (new: 1)
Total number of packages request
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Robin Sheat
* Package name: libany-uri-escape-perl
Version : 0.01
Upstream Author : Fred Moyer
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Any-URI-Escape
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
Programming Lang: Perl
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Chris Cormack
* Package name: libbusiness-edifact-interchange-perl
Version : 0.07
Upstream Author : Colin Campbell,
* URL : https://metacpan.org/pod/Business::Edifact::Interchange
* License : (GPL, Artistic)
Programmin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Evan Hanson
* Package name: abduco
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Marc Andre Tanner
* URL : http://www.brain-dump.org/projects/abduco/
* License : ISC
Programming Lang: C
Description : abduco provides session ma
Hi,
On 14.07.2014 14:05, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> How about creating a new apache2-config package just to move these
> configuration files?
for the record: from an informal request the Release Team does not seem
to be comfortable with anything like that. Therefore, I suspect if
anything, I nee
Could we please decouple the --purge-unused thread with the "Solutions
for the Apache upgrade hell" thread?
It's getting confusing and I am only interested about Apache2 and not
about aptitude.
Thanks,
O.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014, at 23:32, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Jo, 17 iul 14, 03:17:35, Vincent
On Jo, 17 iul 14, 03:17:35, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2014-07-16 14:28:00 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:36:32AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > I do that too. I haven't seen any official documentation saying that
> > > this is a bad thing to do.
> >
> > apti
2014-07-17 2:20 GMT+02:00 brian m. carlson :
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:43:17PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>> Some sites (I mean, deployments) like to use a caching proxy, especially
>> if many machines use the same resource, and/or bandwidth is scarce. Or
>> even just one machine accessin
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 04:53:26PM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Looking at the policy again, I think extra is (mis)used quite too
> often.
Part of the problem could be that dh_make at least at one point (maybe
still does) put "extra" as defalt Priority in its templates and it
might've gotten cop
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > On kfreebsd, init would then depend on an optional package as we don't
> > support arch-specific priorities. That is (IIRC) a policy violation, but
> > do any practical problems arise from this?
>
> It would be useful to have a comment from one of the debootstrap
> maint
On Thu, 2014-07-17 at 13:11 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> >Since Linux 2.6.29, you get 128 random bits at each execve(), which you
> >can access like this:
>
> getauxval() is only in (e)glibc, not in dietlibc or klibc, though.
True, and it was only added in glibc 2.16.
Luca Falavigna wrote:
>IMO, these should be handled on a case-by-case basis.
Agreed.
>Looking more at it, it seems there are a lot of packages requiring
>dependencies which are extra:
There is a bug in the file, IMHO, though:
mediawiki:
dependency:
php5-mysqlnd: extra
The situation is:
2014-07-17 16:31 GMT+02:00 Thorsten Glaser :
>> * https://ftp-master.debian.org/override-disparity.gz
>
> This is not shown in the PTS, though. If we could get it to show
> up there, and maybe DDPO, that could help.
Indeed, it's in yaml format, so I guess it should be easy to integrate
it in PTS
Luca Falavigna wrote:
>> Among even minbase, there are a *lot* of violations of this
>> particular rule of Policy. There is also nothing in place
>> checking them.
>
>Actually, there are two tools to check this:
> * [4]https://ftp-master.debian.org/override-disparity.gz
Ah, that's new... before
On 17.07.2014 15:38, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> My understanding was that the new apache binaries would install new
> config files, and it would then work? (With the correct
> replaces/breaks/...)
Yes. However, Apache has a notable number of configuration files (not
conffiles), namely symlink
* Vincent Lefevre [140717 04:02]:
> On 2014-07-17 03:21:28 +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > * Arno Töll [140713 13:25]:
> > > * Ignore the problem, and refer to the manpage of aptitude without
> > > proper fix etc. which clearly says "THIS OPTION CAN CAUSE DATA LOSS! DO
> > > NOT USE IT U
Hi!
2014-07-17 15:27 GMT+02:00 Thorsten Glaser :
>>A Priority: required package (init) isn't allowed to depend on something
>>with Priority: standard per policy.
>
> Among even minbase, there are a *lot* of violations of this
> particular rule of Policy. There is also nothing in place
> checking t
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>> What are the reasons behind are you going for required and not standard?
>
>A Priority: required package (init) isn't allowed to depend on something
>with Priority: standard per policy.
Among even minbase, there are a *lot* of violations of this
particular rule of Policy
Ben Hutchings wrote:
>Since Linux 2.6.29, you get 128 random bits at each execve(), which you
>can access like this:
getauxval() is only in (e)glibc, not in dietlibc or klibc, though.
Also, glibc already uses all 128 bits in some other place.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
Russ Allbery wrote:
>Steven Chamberlain writes:
>> * first-forked process does not use the PRNG yet, but forks again
Actually, it does: it calls RAND_poll(), which libressl made
into a nop.
>control. There has been some talk of implementing PID randomization
>precisely to make this attack har
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Delafond
* Package name: iosnoop
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Copyright (c) 2014 Brendan Gregg
* URL :
https://github.com/brendangregg/perf-tools/blob/master/iosnoop
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: bas
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jelmer Vernooij
* Package name: golang-mreiferson-httpclient
Version : 0.0
Upstream Author : Matt Reiferson
* URL : https://github.com/mreiferson/go-httpclient
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Go
Description : a
Guillem Jover wrote:
>Exactly. I don't have any intention to change the current dpkg-source
>default behavior in that regard.
ACK.
But people who touch packages without d/s/format can just
write "1.0\n" into it, to retain existing behaviour without
the warning. Still, changing the default is bad
Hello,
As I read in debian policy:
10.5 Symbolic links
In general, symbolic links within a top-level directory should be
relative, and symbolic links pointing from one top-level directory to
or into another should be absolute. (A top-level directory is a
sub-directory of the root directory /.)
2014-07-16 22:32 GMT+02:00 Miguel Landaeta :
> It's totally normal to have technical disagreements, especially on a
> non-trivial packages like that one. What I really dislike is to
> see epithets like "bullshit" or "own agenda" in a technical
> discussion.
>
+1
--
Arnaud Vandyck
http://about.m
On 07/16/14 17:56, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> BTW, it feels weird that the package build-depends on debhelper when it
> really is using CDBS. The debian/copyright is also quite wrong, as it
> doesn't include the copyright notice for the GPL v2 (and I believe
> that's mandatory, right?). Not comment
On 07/16/14 17:56, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> To try to kill your frustration, I have sponsored the upload of your fix
> to the delayed/10 queue. If everything goes well, then in 15 days,
> network-manager-strongswan will be back in Jessie.
>
Thanx very much for your help
Regards
Harri
--
To
Hi Emmanuel,
>Ok, but could you say it nicely please? I just came across this info and
>brought it on the list for discussion because it'll impact us at some
>point. So don't shoot the messenger.
>Changing the source/target is often a trivial modification. I'm not
>asking for actively updating al
]] Harald Dunkel
> On 07/16/14 23:22, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > So we are proposing the following scheme:
> >
> > a/ Upload a new "init" package. This is a new, essential package that
> > will replace sysvinit as the package that ensures your system has an
> > init system. We want to build this
Hi folks,
On 07/17/14 03:16, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> * Wookey [140716 23:48]:
>
>> I do think there is plenty more room for soialising more NMUing. There
>> are piles of bugs in the archive that mostly just need uploading, and
>> many packages with a backlog of minor bugs, or packaging t
36 matches
Mail list logo
