On 07/16/14 17:56, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > BTW, it feels weird that the package build-depends on debhelper when it > really is using CDBS. The debian/copyright is also quite wrong, as it > doesn't include the copyright notice for the GPL v2 (and I believe > that's mandatory, right?). Not commenting on the fact that it's still > using the format 1.0 without debian/source/format file, etc. In other > words, I agree that this package is in the need for a bit more care. >
I can send you another NMU, if you are interested? There is also a new upstream version, but I would guess this is beyond scope for an NMU? The copyright file containes a pointer to /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2. Is this insufficient? Regards Harri -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53c7a83a.3030...@aixigo.de
