On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:35:26AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
>
> > - security patches should be clearly marked as such in every *.patch
> > file
>
> That sounds like a good idea, could you add it to the wiki page?
It's not always easy t
Hi,
David Suárez kindly did an archive rebuild with the new
version of make in experimental, and the results of the build are at:
http://aws-logs.debian.net/ftbfs-logs/results-make4/
The summary: 73 packages have failed, though not all seem
obviously related to make. Out of
Scott Kitterman writes:
> Recently there have been a number of questions about source
> requirements for the Debian archive. The FTP master view of this [is:]
> We consider source packages to be part of the Debian system and as
> such all files in source packages must come with their source as
>
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
> - security patches should be clearly marked as such in every *.patch
> file
That sounds like a good idea, could you add it to the wiki page?
> - easy create and run programs from chroot and alternate users
Could you detail what you m
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Peter wrote:
> Debian-devel team,
Your post doesn't seem to be on-topic here, probably debian-user or
the GNOME community would be best.
> a full-featured desktop menu.
By full-featured menu you appear to mean a hierarchical menu instead
of a searchable flat men
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:45 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Plus, crashing in a screensaver is bad :D
Only if the screensaver or the thing that runs it is written without
the possibility of crashes in mind.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel
On 4/25/14, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> previously on this list Paul Wise contributed:
>
>> I have written a non-exhaustive list of goals for hardening the Debian
>> distribution, the Debian project and computer systems of the Debian
>> project, contributors and users.
>>
>> https://wiki.debian.org/Ha
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 10:57:39 +0800
Paul Wise wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have written a non-exhaustive list of goals for hardening the Debian
> distribution, the Debian project and computer systems of the Debian
> project, contributors and users.
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/Hardening/Goals
>
> If y
Debian-devel team,
On the Web page announcing extended support for Debian 6, you state
"Users ... are encouraged to upgrade to Debian 7 (“wheezy”)". Well, I
tried Debian 7 on my desktop PCs and laptops. My first and strongest
impression was of the menu. It is a dumbed-down Ubuntu / Windows 8
st
On 2014-04-28 16:45:56 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Shachar Shemesh debian.org> writes:
>
> > the changes there is a runtime check for undefined behavior. Just
> > compile with -fsanitize=undefined, and your program will crash with
> > log if it performs an operation that C/C++ con
After more than 2 month rebuild, we have more than 7k packages built
successfully,
and more than 1k in queue, and it will be more with the process of build.
You can get the buildlogs from
http://mips.wicp.net:9998/mips2/buildlog/
The FTBFS list (aka attempted in sbuild) can be get from
ht
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Prévot
Control: block 746293 by -1
* Package name: phpunit-git
Version : 1.2.0
Upstream Author : Sebastian Bergmann
* URL : https://github.com/sebastianbergmann/finder-facade
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:15:32PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> Please use a wording that also grants permission to link to forks of
> OpenSSL such as LibreSSL, in case LibreSSL or another fork is
> preferred over OpenSSL in the future. You can take wget as an example:
No, please use a more secu
At Sun, 27 Apr 2014 08:22:59 +0200,
Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
>
> > Dariusz Dwornikowski writes:
> >
> > >> PKG_CHECK_MODULES([openssl], [openssl], [],
> > >> [AC_MSG_ERROR([openssl is required for profanity])])
> > >>
> > >> The resulting binary cannot be distributed.
> >
> > > Could Yo
Hi!
On Apr 26, 2014 4:26 PM, "Maximiliano Curia" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Cinnamon is a desktop environment based on GNOME, but with a different
> shell and some other replaced parts (screensaver, file manager, system
> settings, etc). It was created by Linux Mint, but it's independent of
> the distri
On Apr 28, 2014, at 01:12 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>Both soappy and fpconst seem dead upstream, which makes option 2 more
>attractive, but it looks like the soap implementations in python3 do
>not get along very well with debbugs, as Jordan notes.
A REST API would be fantastic. The best REST li
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Zygmunt Krynicki
* Package name: pyotherside
Version : 1.2.0
Upstream Author : Thomas Perl
* URL : http://thp.io/2011/pyotherside/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Asynchronous Python 3 Binding
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Prévot
Control: block 744876 by -1
* Package name: php-loc
Version : 2.0.4
Upstream Author : Sebastian Bergmann
* URL : https://github.com/sebastianbergmann/phploc
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: PHP
Quoting Daniel Pocock (2014-04-28 20:10:09)
> On 28/04/14 18:59, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > Paul Wise dijo [Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 11:41:17AM +0800]:
> >>> a generalized approach is needed.
> >>
> >> Multiple versions of a package seems undesirable to me, for the
> >> same reasons as static libraries an
Quoting Thorsten Glaser (2014-04-28 19:22:11)
> Jonas Smedegaard jones.dk> writes:
>
>> Please elaborate what you mean can "trigger later".
>>
>> Simple example: Choosing via debconf to have adduser create homes
>> below "/srv/home" instead of the default "/home".
>
> Ah, sure.
>
> Admin installs
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=732644
>
> Reportbug uses debianbts, and debianbts in turn uses soappy. So it all
> depends on either porting soappy (and fpconst, used by soappy) to
> python3 or porting debianbts away fr
On 28/04/14 18:59, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Paul Wise dijo [Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 11:41:17AM +0800]:
>>> a generalized approach is needed.
>>
>> Multiple versions of a package seems undesirable to me, for the same
>> reasons as static libraries and embedded code copies are undesirable.
>>
>> Systems t
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 04:14:36PM +0200, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> The cinnamon package and dependencies included in Debian are currently
> uninstallable, and have been unmantained for a year.
>
> I have prepared new packages, adding their sources to the collab-maint
> alioth project. There's s
Shachar Shemesh debian.org> writes:
> My understanding of things is that undefined behaviors are fairly
> common, and almost always benign. Look at the following code:
> int add( int a, int b )
> {
> return a+b;
> }
> Do you really want to get a "Warning: signed in
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 28.04.2014 16:34, schrieb Felipe Sateler:
>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:44:39 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>
>>> you are not writing which packages you are talking about ...
>>>
>>> Am 28.04.2014 12:16, schrieb Osamu Aoki:
python3 sup
Jonas Smedegaard jones.dk> writes:
> Please elaborate what you mean can "trigger later".
>
> Simple example: Choosing via debconf to have adduser create homes below
> "/srv/home" instead of the default "/home".
Ah, sure.
Admin installs adduser. adduser defaults to /home.
Admin now installs yo
Steven Chamberlain pyro.eu.org> writes:
> I'd say the code still looks quite 'portable' in that it is ANSI C and
> isn't using kernel-specific features. arc4random is just a library
> routine from their libc and I see no reason it can't be borrowed.
No, it’s more.
And after sysctl() got remove
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:16 AM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Questions are how Debian Jessie packages should be packaged with regards
> to configuration choices etc.:
>
> wayland support or not (I am skipping ones using libwayland-dev now)
> python3 support or not (Are we moving too?)
> X sessi
Am 28.04.2014 16:34, schrieb Felipe Sateler:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:44:39 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
>> you are not writing which packages you are talking about ...
>>
>> Am 28.04.2014 12:16, schrieb Osamu Aoki:
>>> python3 support or not (Are we moving too?)
>>
>> bindings and python modul
Paul Wise dijo [Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 11:41:17AM +0800]:
> > a generalized approach is needed.
>
> Multiple versions of a package seems undesirable to me, for the same
> reasons as static libraries and embedded code copies are undesirable.
>
> Systems that do this already exist though:
>
> https:
Le lundi 28 avril 2014 à 19:16 +0900, Osamu Aoki a écrit :
> I, as the ibus maintainer, tend to update ibus with almost the same
> compile options and patches used for the latest Fedora packages to make
> it behave well with GNOME3. (But I am also careful not to disable
> supports for other deskt
Kurt Roeckx roeckx.be> writes:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 07:07:45PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> > But meanwhile, OpenBSD developers are extensively cleaning up OpenSSL
> > 1.0.1g.
>
> One of the problems with anything from OpenBSD is that they only
> care about OpenBSD, and if you want t
Shachar Shemesh debian.org> writes:
> the changes there is a runtime check for undefined behavior. Just
> compile with -fsanitize=undefined, and your program will crash with
> log if it performs an operation that C/C++ considers to be
> undefined.
This does not help. At all.
Con
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 02:44:39PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> you are not writing which packages you are talking about ...
ibus source package
> Am 28.04.2014 12:16, schrieb Osamu Aoki:
> > python3 support or not (Are we moving too?)
/usr/bin/ibus-setup command in the ibus package fro
Package: wnpp
Owner: Barak A. Pearlmutter
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: latex-coffee-stains
Version : 4
Upstream Author : Hanno Rein
* URL or Web page : http://hanno-rein.de/archives/349
* License : "You can freely distribute this package as I do not believe
in imagi
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 04/28/2014 06:16 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Questions are how Debian Jessie packages should be packaged with regards
>> to configuration choices etc.:
>>
>> wayland support or not (I am skipping ones using libwayland-dev now)
>>
On Apr 28, 2014, at 07:16 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> python3 support or not (Are we moving too?)
I will of course echo Matthias and Thomas on the issue of Python 3 support.
I'd like to see us migrating to Python 3 for any "system" scripts,
i.e. scripts that come with Debian by default or are relied
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:44:39 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> you are not writing which packages you are talking about ...
>
> Am 28.04.2014 12:16, schrieb Osamu Aoki:
>> python3 support or not (Are we moving too?)
>
> bindings and python modules should be built for both Python2 and
> Python3. If
On Monday, April 28, 2014 14:44:39 Matthias Klose wrote:
> you are not writing which packages you are talking about ...
>
> Am 28.04.2014 12:16, schrieb Osamu Aoki:
> > python3 support or not (Are we moving too?)
>
> bindings and python modules should be built for both Python2 and Python3. If
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Radovan Garabík"
* Package name: verynice
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Radovan Garabík
* URL : http://kassiopeia.juls.savba.sk/~garabik/software/verynice/
* License : GPL v2 or more
Programming Lang: Python
Descr
On 04/28/2014 06:16 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Questions are how Debian Jessie packages should be packaged with regards
> to configuration choices etc.:
>
> wayland support or not (I am skipping ones using libwayland-dev now)
> python3 support or not (Are we moving too?)
> X session autos
you are not writing which packages you are talking about ...
Am 28.04.2014 12:16, schrieb Osamu Aoki:
> python3 support or not (Are we moving too?)
bindings and python modules should be built for both Python2 and Python3. If you
cannot support both for some reason, please give Python3 the prefer
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jakub Wilk
* Package name: socket-wrapper
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Andreas Schneider
* URL : http://cwrap.org/socket_wrapper.html
* License : BSD 3 clauses
Programming Lang: C
Description : socket wrapper li
Hi,
Questions are how Debian Jessie packages should be packaged with regards
to configuration choices etc.:
wayland support or not (I am skipping ones using libwayland-dev now)
python3 support or not (Are we moving too?)
X session autostart scripts under systemd
Here are the backgrounds:
The
]] Don Armstrong
> On Sat, 26 Apr 2014, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > And simultaneous installation of multiple versions of packages is
> > simply a requirement for many research computing scenarios, usually
> > because there's a lot of bespoke scientific code that accomplishes
> > some specific goal b
Le dimanche 27 avril 2014 à 17:16 -0700, Don Armstrong a écrit :
> The right way to handle this for research computing scenarios is to
> deploy virtual machines with specific versions otherwise you're
> constantly battling with trying to make sure that you're actually using
> the version that y
46 matches
Mail list logo
