We have over 380K kenyan email addresses from directories , magazines,
newspapers, lists of seminar/conference participants etc
All the email id's have been validated over the internet, this guarantees over
90% successfull delivery rate.
The list only contains email id's and no other demogra
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yaroslav Halchenko
* Package name: seaborn
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : Michael Waskom
* URL : http://stanford.edu/~mwaskom/software/seaborn/
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Python s
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 02:15:17AM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> I suggest not to spend any time on this. Mostly since the old
> conquest's upstream[0] isn't dead, unlike stated in #591487. This just
> might have changed in the meantime. But now, if ever anyone brings the
> old "conquest" back in
Pablo Lorenzzoni wrote...
> How should I proceed?
I suggest not to spend any time on this. Mostly since the old
conquest's upstream[0] isn't dead, unlike stated in #591487. This just
might have changed in the meantime. But now, if ever anyone brings the
old "conquest" back into Debian but you hav
Distributing pornography in academic network in Taiwan seems like a gray
area. http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/EngLawContent.aspx?Type=E&id=2
If it can be distributed from a separate repo it should be fine, but I also
wonder how many mirrors are under the place where pornography is not
allowed to distri
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
* Package name: rr
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Mozilla Foundation
* URL : http://rr-project.org
* License : BSD and MIT/X
Programming Lang: C, C++
Description : application execution recorder, p
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 02:58:55PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Mar 2014, Adrien CLERC wrote:
>
> > Le 24/03/2014 14:23, Raphael Geissert a écrit :
> > >> Anyway, I strongly recommend that nobody waste their time on an issue
> > >> which in a couple of years will be much less relevan
On Du, 23 mar 14, 17:03:00, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 08:41:48AM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > And while we are at it, do we *really* need the information about
> > /bin/sh in at least a significant share of today's bug reports?
>
> You probably want it, because a decent n
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 16:48:18 -0300, Pablo Lorenzzoni wrote:
> Hello ALL,
>
> I took over packaging for Conquest DICOM Server a few months ago (bug
> #680352) and I am approaching upload state. You can check my work in Debian
> Git [1].
>
> Since the shortest form of the package name would be
Control: reassign -1 wnpp
On Lu, 24 mar 14, 10:59:31, Israel wrote:
> Package: variety
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Variety changes the wallpaper on a regular interval using user-specified or
> automatically downloaded images.
>
> Variety changes the desktop wallpaper on a regular basis, using
> use
Le 24/03/2014 22:18, Edward Allcutt a écrit :
> I believe you are mistaken. That blog post is about Google's own
> design for "DNSSEC stapled certificates" . Not DANE.
I figured it out after a more careful reading. I forgot about this trial
from Google, that was obviously not used enough to be usef
Package: general
Severity: important
After moving the top menu bar to the left side of the screen I am forced to
logout, and then on every login I am forced to logout.
If I knew which config files to edit I could login as another user and repair
the problem.
This install is in a VirtualBox, and t
Le 24/03/2014 14:23, Raphael Geissert a écrit :
Anyway, I strongly recommend that nobody waste their time on an issue
which in a couple of years will be much less relevant thanks to DANE.
If only people actually used DNSSEC and DANE - Chromium/Google Chrome dropped
support for the latter due to
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 16:48 -0300, Pablo Lorenzzoni wrote:
> Hello ALL,
>
> I took over packaging for Conquest DICOM Server a few months ago (bug
> #680352) and I am approaching upload state. You can check my work in Debian
> Git [1].
>
> Since the shortest form of the package name would be "conq
On 3/24/14, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
[...]
> So instead, we have a simple set of questions that should be applied,
> helping to judge contents before upload:
>
> - Is it likely illegal in the majority of the countries of our
>Developers?
>
> - Will it harm Debian, our mirrors, derivatives or use
Thank you Joerg
Makes very good sense to me.
On 24 March 2014 20:11, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Triggered by the discussion to include a controversial "visual novel" in
> the Debian archive, we feel that a statement from the ftpteam on what is
> considered acceptable for the archive is ca
Hello ALL,
I took over packaging for Conquest DICOM Server a few months ago (bug
#680352) and I am approaching upload state. You can check my work in Debian
Git [1].
Since the shortest form of the package name would be "conquest" and I'll have
to spin off several bin packages from the source (suc
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 17:57:21 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Unless I missed your point: It did work somewhat ok for tiff3/tiff4
> source packages AFAIK. No-one depends on source packages directly,
> right ?
>
Please don't take tiff as an example. No API change was involved there.
Cheers,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Seb James
* Package name: brahms
Version : 0.7.3
Upstream Author : Ben Mitchinson
* URL : http://brahms.sourceforge.net/home/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Modular execution framework for Sy
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Seb James
* Package name: spineml-2-brahms
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Alex Cope
* URL : http://bimpa.group.shef.ac.uk/SpineML/index.php/Brahms
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: XSL, Bash
Description : Conv
To all debian developers:
-> systemd is *fundamentally incompatible* with linux
Now, I realize that's a bold claim, but if you are up for some reading, I
will prove it.
First -> a little history just to put this into a context that's easier to
follow
Over a year ago (Nov 2012), I tried to *
On 24/03/14 16:17, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Allowing things with mismatching changelog vs. distribution into the
> archive will introduce problems by the way, since cowbuilder just
> copies the distribution from the changelog
Thanks for the useful data point, but this isn't about allowing things
t
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Cameron Norman
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 4:38 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>>
>>
>> Which way should I go:
>>
>> 1. Upload a src:openjpeg1 which will contains the legacy openjpeg 1.x
>> branch and src:openjepg will get openjpeg 2.x or
>> 2. Upload a new s
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 4:38 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
> Which way should I go:
>
> 1. Upload a src:openjpeg1 which will contains the legacy openjpeg 1.x
> branch and src:openjepg will get openjpeg 2.x or
> 2. Upload a new src:openjpeg2 with the goal to get rid of src:openjpeg
> in a coupl
Joachim Breitner debian.org> writes:
> The minified file contains a copyright header, and the license is MIT,
> so I believe shipping jquery-1.11.0.min.js without query-1.11.0.js is
It’s legal, but it’s not allowed because it breaks the *promise* we
(Debian) do to our users/downstreams.
That’s
Joachim Breitner debian.org> writes:
> Before this thread gets too long and we hear too many opinion from
> people don’t have a say in this (like me), I’d like to hear an official
> statement from the ftp-team on the question:
>
> Does Debian tolerate files in upstream tarballs that are
Simon McVittie debian.org> writes:
> tl;dr: extensive discussion of why this mistake is easy to make and
> why sbuild can't trivially fix it; Raphael Hertzog suggests making
Allowing things with mismatching changelog vs. distribution into the
archive will introduce problems by the way, since cow
Thomas Goirand debian.org> writes:
> But when the package isn't in stable (yet), and is only in Sid/testing,
> how long should a transition package last? Until the next stable
> release? IMO it'd be bad to have a transition package introduced in the
> new Stable if the package wasn't in old-stabl
On Mon, 24 Mar 2014, Adrien CLERC wrote:
> Le 24/03/2014 14:23, Raphael Geissert a écrit :
> >> Anyway, I strongly recommend that nobody waste their time on an issue
> >> which in a couple of years will be much less relevant thanks to DANE.
> > If only people actually used DNSSEC and DANE - Chromi
Le 24/03/2014 14:23, Raphael Geissert a écrit :
>> Anyway, I strongly recommend that nobody waste their time on an issue
>> which in a couple of years will be much less relevant thanks to DANE.
> If only people actually used DNSSEC and DANE - Chromium/Google Chrome dropped
> support for the latter
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> I suggest that anybody who wants to partecipate to this debate should
> clarify if their goal is:
> - choosing appropriate defaults for the general population of our users
> - taking a stand against the PKI system
As a co-maintainer, any email that falls in the second categor
[Couldn't get any info from debian-mentors, so reposting to debian-devel]
Hi,
I am preparing to upload openjpeg 2.0. This is a major API (yes API)
change from previous openjpeg 1.x. I am thinking of doing something
similar to gtk+1.2 and gtk+2.0 packages. Basically we will have two source
packa
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-saharaclient
Version : 0.6.0
Upstream Author : openstack-...@lists.openstack.org
* URL : https://github.com/openstack/python-saharaclient
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Py
33 matches
Mail list logo
