On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 02:15:17AM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote: > I suggest not to spend any time on this. Mostly since the old > conquest's upstream[0] isn't dead, unlike stated in #591487. This just > might have changed in the meantime. But now, if ever anyone brings the > old "conquest" back into Debian but you have taken the name in > meantime, expect a lot of disturbance.
It was never dead. The Subject line of the bug suggests that the reporter was very confused. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140325012004.ga31...@scru.org
