Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: KURASHIKI Satoru
* Package name: ruby-specinfra
Version : 0.0.15
Upstream Author : Gosuke Miyashita
* URL : https://github.com/serverspec/specinfra
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : Common laye
On 12/17/2013 08:05 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 08:02:59AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> On Tue Dec 17 2013 01:33:18 AM HKT, Paul Tagliamonte
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 01:29:06AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
That's a very good news. However, if this
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 08:02:59AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On Tue Dec 17 2013 01:33:18 AM HKT, Paul Tagliamonte
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 01:29:06AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > > That's a very good news. However, if this is your view, why don't you
> > > just accept the
On Tue Dec 17 2013 01:33:18 AM HKT, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 01:29:06AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > That's a very good news. However, if this is your view, why don't you
> > just accept the package now?
>
> No one told me "Yes", and let me know it was re-uploaded. I
Hello,
On 16 December 2013 23:02, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Matthias Klumpp [2013-12-16 23:46 +0100]:
>> 2013/12/16 Tae Wong :
>> > Here is a post to LibreOffice's problem with the editing copyright message:
>> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2013-December/058214.html
>> >
>> > You'
Tagliamonte:
Your native language is Korean and if you'll need to post questions
about Debian in Korean language.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CAMu
+++ Matthias Klumpp [2013-12-16 23:46 +0100]:
> 2013/12/16 Tae Wong :
> > Here is a post to LibreOffice's problem with the editing copyright message:
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2013-December/058214.html
> >
> > You're not subscribed to debian-devel and LibreOffice's maili
2013/12/16 Tae Wong :
> Here is a post to LibreOffice's problem with the editing copyright message:
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2013-December/058214.html
>
> You're not subscribed to debian-devel and LibreOffice's mailing list.
I have the feeling that this is indeed some kin
Here is a post to LibreOffice's problem with the editing copyright message:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2013-December/058214.html
You're not subscribed to debian-devel and LibreOffice's mailing list.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:44:36 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:21:13AM +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>> 2013/12/16 Mathieu Malaterre :
>> >>> Thanks for working on xbmc. BTW, Are you in touch with Andres about
>> >>> that?
>> >> I tried to reach him and team-x...@list
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013, Tae Wong wrote:
Hi,
> You've replied to Launchpad Feedback #41165 asking for account
> (seotaewong40) to be available (this account has been already
> suspended).
As you already have been told, this list is about Debian and not about
Launchpad. Please don't abuse this list fo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Muchembled
* Package name: fssync
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Julien Muchembled
* URL : http://jmuchemb.eu/fssync.git
* License : GPL 3
Programming Lang: Python
Description : File system synchronizatio
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:47:07PM +1100, Craig Small wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:10:52AM +1100, Craig Small wrote:
> > upstream what they are going to do? If they are going to keep pidof
> > then the change is not required. If the projects plans is to
> Which I did.
> For the moment the
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 01:29:06AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> That's a very good news. However, if this is your view, why don't you
> just accept the package now?
No one told me "Yes", and let me know it was re-uploaded. I think I left
a note on it, so it wasn't in my usual process-new workflo
On 12/16/2013 10:48 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 01:47:21PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> However, it has been three monthes that the package is blocked in the NEW
>> queue
>> because the FTP team would prefer its contents to be part of an existing
>> package.
>
> Pless
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 02:35:54PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Philipp Kern wrote:
>
> >…and Xen in general. I agree with this assessment.
>
> Isn’t there a GRUB2 port for Xen now?
So I heard. In fact I remember a conversation with Colin Watson and
Ian Jackson about a month back about how a
Thorsten Glaser, le Mon 16 Dec 2013 14:35:54 +, a écrit :
> Philipp Kern wrote:
> >…and Xen in general. I agree with this assessment.
>
> Isn’t there a GRUB2 port for Xen now?
Yes, and it will be part of the grub2 source code, but that's not
released yet.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
You've replied to Launchpad Feedback #41165 asking for account
(seotaewong40) to be available (this account has been already
suspended).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http:
This account in Launchpad is unavailable for renaming an answer title
multiple times:
https://edge.launchpad.net/~seotaewong40
Please enable your account from Launchpad.
This account hasn't signed the Ubuntu Code of Conduct and has
contributed to translating programs to Korean language, bug repor
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Uwe Hermann
* Package name: libserialport
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Martin Ling
* URL : http://sigrok.org/wiki/Libserialport
* License : LGPL3+
Programming Lang: C
Description : Crossplatform serial port h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/16/2013 09:51 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 10:38:58PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> wrote:
>> So, the alternatives then are either removing xbmc, mplayer and all
>> packages with dependencies on these or switch
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 10:38:58PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 12/15/2013 10:11 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > Bálint Réczey schrieb:
> >> How about introducing the ffmpeg shared libraries with libffmpeg
> >> prefix instead of libav prefix?
> >
> > No way. Keeping up with secur
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 01:47:21PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> However, it has been three monthes that the package is blocked in the NEW
> queue
> because the FTP team would prefer its contents to be part of an existing
> package.
Plessy, I'm finding dealing with these misrepresentations tires
Philipp Kern wrote:
>â¦and Xen in general. I agree with this assessment.
Isnât there a GRUB2 port for Xen now?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/l8n
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sergio Schvezov
* Package name: go-flags
Version : 0.0~git20131216+062143ceda
Upstream Author : Jesse van den Kieboom
* URL : https://github.com/jessevdk/go-flags
* License : BSD-3-Clause
Programming Lang: Go
Descrip
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:21:13AM +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> 2013/12/16 Mathieu Malaterre :
> >>> Thanks for working on xbmc. BTW, Are you in touch with Andres about that?
> >> I tried to reach him and team-x...@lists.launchpad.net several times
> >> without success.
> >> Now the MIA Team
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alastair McKinstry
* Package name: pyferret
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory
* URL : http://ferret.pmel.noaa.gov/Ferret/documentation/pyferret
* License : Ferret License Agreemen
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:10:52AM +1100, Craig Small wrote:
> upstream what they are going to do? If they are going to keep pidof
> then the change is not required. If the projects plans is to
Which I did.
For the moment they have no plans moving pidof though they don't seem
terribly fussed eit
2013/12/16 Mathieu Malaterre :
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Bálint Réczey
> wrote:
>> Hi Reinhard,
>>
>> 2013/12/16 Reinhard Tartler :
>>> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Bálint Réczey
>>> wrote:
>>>
Regarding xbmc please don't remove it.
It works with libav to some extent and
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> Hi Reinhard,
>
> 2013/12/16 Reinhard Tartler :
>> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Bálint Réczey
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Regarding xbmc please don't remove it.
>>> It works with libav to some extent and I'm tyring to convince upstream to
>>> let
Hi Reinhard,
2013/12/16 Reinhard Tartler :
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>
>> Regarding xbmc please don't remove it.
>> It works with libav to some extent and I'm tyring to convince upstream to
>> let me join the team responsible for packaging. I plan keeping xbmc workin
Le 15/12/2013 13:03, Niels Thykier a écrit :
>>> Keeping them around is different from them being considered as release
>>> architectures (or even just keeping them in testing). Keeping these
>>> architectures in testing do involve a burden, like blocking testing
>>> migration when they FTBFS[1].
32 matches
Mail list logo
