On Sunday, August 25, 2013 14:08:31 Steve Langasek wrote:
> Or perhaps it would be better to actually import into dgit directly from
> UDD? Since UDD has a more or less complete history of all packages in
> Debian, probably more extensive than even what we can assemble from
> snapshots.debian.org
Steve Langasek wrote:
> I would have expected dgit to support pristine-tar
> directly/automatically/unconditionally. Any system that requires me to
> download the same information (== the upstream source) both from a VCS
> repository and the archive in order to get a fully-formed source package fo
On 08/24/2013 03:53 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> There is a very clear standard that distinguishes globally and locally
> administered addresses.
>
> While you would possibly to buy your own OUI and make global assignments
> to your VMs, I seriously doubt you are doing that. Don't steal address
> s
On 08/21/2013 05:45 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> Large hosting companies not having made their scripts etc. good enough
> to ride out upgrades well should have nothing to do with any decision.
I don't think the problem here is with "Large hosting companies not
having made their scripts etc. good en
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Vincent Bernat
* Package name: ngrok
Version : 0.17
Upstream Author : Alan Shreve
* URL : https://ngrok.com/
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Go
Description : secure introspectable tunnels to localhost
n
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller
* Package name: doxia-1.0
Version : 1.0~alpha-6
* URL : http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/doxia/doxia/tags/
Programming Lang: Java
Description : 1.0 alpha version of Doxia from codehaus
Doxia from Codehaus
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 05:56:00PM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> >> In practice one doesn't actually care how far back the history goes,
> >> as the history that is interesting is where developers get to do
> >> intermediate commits between the two uploads to granulise the
> >> changes
> >
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 08:11:56PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Steve Langasek writes ("Re: Introducing dgit - git integration with the
> Debian archive"):
> > I don't think "removing the automatic importer" is an improvement at all.
> I agree. Except that I wanted something I could deploy and u
Hi All,
On szo, 2013-08-24 at 17:40 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: Introducing dgit - git integration with the
> Debian archive"):
> > This is wrong on so many levels...
>
> I don't think we are going to agree. I stand by the description in
> the dgit manpage.
I agree
Steve Langasek writes ("Re: Introducing dgit - git integration with the Debian
archive"):
> I don't think "removing the automatic importer" is an improvement at all.
I agree. Except that I wanted something I could deploy and use
immediately. Providing an automatic importer would involve
sudden
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 08:01:37AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 08/24/2013 07:55 PM, Robert Holtzm wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 11:45:54PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
>
> >>Here I assume that U.S. law is not so draconian that it can require
> >>someone who has contributed to Debian (and w
On 25 August 2013 17:31, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 12:51:31PM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> I have maintenance access to UDD & have filed a few bugs about it, and
>> all I can say is that dgit so far is getting a lot of things right:
>
>
>
>> 2) removing automatic import
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 12:51:31PM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> I have maintenance access to UDD & have filed a few bugs about it, and
> all I can say is that dgit so far is getting a lot of things right:
> 2) removing automatic importer
> forcing all the checks on the developer side & forc
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Introducing dgit - git integration with the Debian
archive"):
> Unfortunately there is a problem that means it's difficult for others
> to test. The alioth git directory is not writeable by the right
> group. [...]
I have fixed this by using a subdirectory instead, whos
Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: Introducing dgit - git integration with the Debian
archive"):
> What you mean is that on the server side the dgit-branches containing the
> uploads are in refs/dgit/ and not in refs/heads/. But there will also
> be refs/heads/dgit/ branches on the server side since tha
On 22 August 2013 20:52, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I'm pleased to announce that dgit 0.7, which is a version of dgit
> suitable for alpha and beta testers, is available in unstable.
>
I have now started daily PPA builds for dgit, for all supported Ubuntu releases.
add-apt-repository ppa:xnox/dgit
Si
On 08/24/2013 07:55 PM, Robert Holtzm wrote:
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 11:45:54PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
Here I assume that U.S. law is not so draconian that it can require
someone who has contributed to Debian (and who is therefore
trusted) to continue doing so.
Don't be too sure. The own
On 25 August 2013 12:04, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> I'm pleased to announce that dgit 0.7, which is a version of dgit
>> suitable for alpha and beta testers, is available in unstable.
>>
>> >From the manpage:
>>
>>dgit [dgit-opts] clone [
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Massimo Manghi
* Package name: tdbcodbc
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Kevin B. Kenny
The Tcl Core Team
* URL : http://tdbc.tcl.tk/
* License : (custom, BSD)
Programming Lang: (C, Tcl)
Descrip
Hello,
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I'm pleased to announce that dgit 0.7, which is a version of dgit
> suitable for alpha and beta testers, is available in unstable.
>
> >From the manpage:
>
>dgit [dgit-opts] clone [dgit-opts] package [suite] [./dir|/dir]
>dgit [dgi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Massimo Manghi
* Package name: tdbcodbc
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Kevin B. Kenny
The Tcl Core Team
* URL : http://tdbc.tcl.tk/
* License : (custom, BSD)
Programming Lang: (C, Tcl)
Descri
21 matches
Mail list logo
