On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 09:27:39AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> We did not have that much time to make extensive tests. On my computer, I did
> not suffer from the lack of a mailcap entry for evince, so please, people
> concerned with #658139, test the package and let us know what you think.
Jean-Christophe Dubacq [2012-07-26 07:47:28 +0200] wrote:
> And AucTeX does not work with emacs24. Even following some indications
> in the bug reports I didn't succeed in having it work, so I
> uninstalled it.
Just a note that Emacs 24 has its own package manager now (M-x
list-packages) and a wo
On 26/07/2012 02:39, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2012-07-25 21:28:16 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 21:58:20 +0200
>> Svante Signell wrote:
>>
>>> Is emacs24 going to be the default package for Wheezy?
>>
>> emacs24 is not in Wheezy yet and has been uploaded to sid since the
>
Vincent Lefevre writes:
> But with:
...
> int r = fegetround();
> if (r != FE_TONEAREST)
> fesetround (FE_TONEAREST);
> y = exp(x);
...
> I only get a 9% slowdown. I suppose that withing glibc code, it can
> be lower.
Makes sense... I can imagine the way overworked CPU d
Package: general
Severity: important
Hi,
I'm using Debian Wheezy with Xorg, Xfce4, and GDM installed, and cannot for the
life of me get the compose key working.
Xfce4 barely recognizes the chances, and when I use setxkbmap -option
compose:lwin that silently fails.
-- System Information:
Debi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Robin Gareus
* Package name: setbfree
Version : 0.5.5
Upstream Author : Will Panther
* URL : https://github.com/pantherb/setBfree
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : DSP tonewheel organ
setBfree is
On 2012-07-25 21:28:16 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 21:58:20 +0200
> Svante Signell wrote:
>
> > Is emacs24 going to be the default package for Wheezy?
>
> emacs24 is not in Wheezy yet and has been uploaded to sid since the
> automatic freeze exception was granted, so it do
On 2012-07-26 03:58:33 +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Vincent Lefevre writes:
> >> So... these functions were made almost an order of magnitude slower
> >> in the (overwhelmingly) common case, in order to handle rare and
> >> exceptional cases...?
> >
> > This depends on the processor. You should get
Le Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 03:51:55PM +, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) a écrit :
>
> It is now visible:
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/mime-support.git;a=summary
Dear all,
I have uploaded to mime-support version 3.53_experimental1 to experimental.
As discussed earlier, me and L
Hi Ulrich,
Ulrich Dangel wrote:
On 07/25/12 02:15, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
>> You don't seem to be in LDAP, nor in the keyring, so no, you're not,
>> unless you're posting under some alias or similar.
>
> I am posting under an alias, but in any case, Debian's LDAP and keyring only
> contain
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
* Package name: smlsharp
Version : 1.0.3
Upstream Author : SML# development team
* URL : http://www.pllab.riec.tohoku.ac.jp/smlsharp/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : Standard M
Hi,
just have a look here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605133
Obviously there is no interest for a package manager in X any more.
So back to the roots with aptitude ... ;-)
Or maybe the idea is that Debian has to be a distribution for servers only?
Here is no response in th
Svante Signell writes:
> I think this issue is very relevant to Wheezy. Why are there so many
> outdated packages going into this release? The whole idea of unstable is
> (to my understanding) to package the latest upstream releases, and get
> the bugs squeezed out, right? And when the freeze hap
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 23:47 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> Adding debian-devel to the recipients. I think the question belongs
> there.
>
> On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 21:39 +, Bart Martens wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:25:47PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2012-07-13 at 00:20 +
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Beren Minor
* Package name: libtenum
Version : 0.9.4
Upstream Author : Beren Minor
* URL : https://github.com/berenm/libtenum
* License : BSL-1.0
Programming Lang: C++
Description : C++ metaprogramming library to
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 21:58:20 +0200
Svante Signell wrote:
> Is emacs24 going to be the default package for Wheezy?
emacs24 is not in Wheezy yet and has been uploaded to sid since the
automatic freeze exception was granted, so it does not have a free pass
into Wheezy.
> If so all the 34
> build-
Hello,
Is emacs24 going to be the default package for Wheezy? If so all the 34
build-dependencies on emacs23 should be changed to emacs24. Alternately,
should both versions be supported with status quo wrt these
dependencies?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
Vincent Lefevre writes:
>> So... these functions were made almost an order of magnitude slower
>> in the (overwhelmingly) common case, in order to handle rare and
>> exceptional cases...?
>
> This depends on the processor. You should get a processor that
> handles rounding-mode change in a better
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 06:44:58AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 12:52:10PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> >> c) Compatibility wrapper. If someone needs this, feel free to email
> >> me and I'll help out however I can.
> >
On 07/24/2012 11:03 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> Ubuntu'e `melange' is Deprecated, and is pending removal from the
> archive (see launchpad[1]).
>
> It's deprecated upstream, and won't exist in Debian :)
>
> Fondly,
> Paul
I thought I made myself clear, but it seems I haven't (sorry):
http://pac
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Leidert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: osra
Version : 1.3.9
Upstream Author : Igor Filippov
* URL : http://cactus.nci.nih.gov/osra/
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: C++, Java
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Daniele E. Domenichelli"
* Package name: yarp
Version : 2.3.19
Upstream Author : Paul Fitzpatrick, Giorgio Metta, Lorenzo Natale, Alessandro
Scalzo
* URL : http://www.yarp.it/
* License : LGPL, GPL
Programming Lang:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Gabriel
* Package name: gosa-plugin-netgroups
Version : 0.2 (in prep.)
Upstream Author : Alejandro Escanero Blanco
* URL :
https://oss.gonicus.de/repositories/gosa-contrib/netgroups/trunk
* License : GPL-2+
Progra
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:15:15AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> We are in the process of discussing a variety of constitutional amendments
> to be raised by the tech-ctte that will hopefully end up creating a sort
> of bundle of constitutional fixes to vote on. Perhaps it would be good to
> includ
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 06:00:21PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Yes, as the new wording is logically inconsistent. *By definition* a Debian
> Project Member, as the term is being used here, is someone who has voting
> rights. The term "Debian Developer" was being used to distinguish between
> p
On 07/25/2012 02:15 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>> ]] Filipus Klutiero
>>
>> > > You are not a Debian developer.
>> >
>> > I am.
>>
>> You don't seem to be in LDAP, nor in the keyring, so no, you're not,
>> unless you're posting under some alias or similar.
>
> I am pos
Le Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 08:20:47AM +0100, Lars Wirzenius a écrit :
>
> Personally I don't think we need separate terms for voting member with
> uploading rights and those without such rights; in the few cases where
> the difference matters, it's easier (I think also better) to spell it
> out rathe
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:15:15AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 07:49:06AM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>
> >> Our constitution does not talk about project members, and instead uses
> >> the word "developer".
>
> > In fact, the Constitution
Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 07:49:06AM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>> Our constitution does not talk about project members, and instead uses
>> the word "developer".
> In fact, the Constitution uses interchangeably "member" and "developer".
> (And that is one of the ba
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 637232 682678
Bug #637232 [general] general: Multiarch breaks support for non-multiarch
toolchain
Bug #639214 [general] eglibc: changes to paths concerning crt1.o, crti.o and
crtn.o breaks building LLVM Trunk
Bug #644986 [general] i38
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 07:49:06AM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Our constitution does not talk about project members, and instead uses
> the word "developer".
In fact, the Constitution uses interchangeably "member" and "developer".
(And that is one of the basis for the slow shift towards "membe
31 matches
Mail list logo
