Stefano Zacchiroli <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 07:49:06AM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>> Our constitution does not talk about project members, and instead uses >> the word "developer". > In fact, the Constitution uses interchangeably "member" and "developer". > (And that is one of the basis for the slow shift towards "member" in > places like nm.d.o and elsewhere. It is correct to do so, constitution > wise, and it exerts less communication emphasis on the activity of > [technical] development.) We are in the process of discussing a variety of constitutional amendments to be raised by the tech-ctte that will hopefully end up creating a sort of bundle of constitutional fixes to vote on. Perhaps it would be good to include in that a terminology standardization on member for the places in the constitution that we refer to voting project members rather than specifically people who upload software. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
