On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 20:02 +1100, Peter Miller wrote:
> I'm looking for a Standard C Library compliance test suite. I'd prefer
> an open source one, preferably with a license more liberal than GPL,
> e.g. BSD or MIT, which is why I can't just use the tests in the glibc
> sources.
newlib, used by
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I've just orphaned svgalib by uploading 1.4.x and 1.9.x packages with
pending changes to unstable and experimental. I recently contacted
upstream to send patches back, but was offered taking over upstream
maintainership instead because he is not interested in it anym
On 31/03/12 01:03, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2012-03-30 19:43:48 +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> On 30/03/12 12:29, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>>> I don't know what's going on exactly, but from the logs, it seems
>>> that when suspending, the connection is ended (as expected), but
>>> the
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:17 PM, John D. Hendrickson and Sara Darnell <
johnandsa...@cox.net> wrote:
> I thought on Gnu site if you get and compile the compiler it already has a
> test suite, for C anyway (i have not tried it personally).
>
He mentions in the message that he's looking for
On 2012-03-31 01:16:42 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2012-03-30 10:44:07 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > I don't think your diagnosis of this is correct, in that I don't think
> > wicd is what's doing this. I was getting things like that with Network
> > Manager as well, and usually rebooting
Hi I'm not a DD but ...
I thought on Gnu site if you get and compile the compiler it already has a test suite, for C anyway
(i have not tried it personally).
Peter Miller wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'm looking for a Standard C Library compliance test suite. I'd prefer
an open source one, preferably
On 2012-03-30 10:44:07 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Vincent Lefevre writes:
> > On 2012-03-29 13:07:56 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> >> Well, it seems like you should file bugs if you can, because a lot of
> >> these are not universal problems and therefore probably aren't known
> >> issues.
>
On 2012-03-30 19:43:48 +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> On 30/03/12 12:29, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > I don't know what's going on exactly, but from the logs, it seems
> > that when suspending, the connection is ended (as expected), but
> > then, wicd tries to reconnect, and this may inte
Samuel Thibault writes:
> It is apparently trying to be a *Linux* standard, being adopted by all
> distributions.
That's not at all clear to me. It seems more to be trying to be a good
init system used by Fedora, and beyond that it's left to people to make up
their own minds, although of course
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 12:18:20AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> If it's *not* for solving everyone's use case, then it's not good for
> making it a default init implementation.
You cannot ever solve everyone's use cases. What systemd (and upstart)
aim to do is to solve all use cases that sysvi
Russ Allbery, le Fri 30 Mar 2012 10:41:05 -0700, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault writes:
> > Russ Allbery, le Thu 29 Mar 2012 23:41:40 -0700, a écrit :
>
> >> It's focused on being clean, supportable, and fully integrated with
> >> Linux capabilities, *not* to solving everyone's use case, even to the
Tollef Fog Heen, le Fri 30 Mar 2012 15:40:55 +0200, a écrit :
> > > The maintenance of systemd is actually quite the opposite of a standard.
> >
> > That sentence is quite frightening.
>
> Is it? It's not like the maintenance of the kernel, KDE or GNOME is
> done in the manner you maintain a stan
Jon Dowland writes:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 02:30:37PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Shouldn't there rather be a base-desktop that both KDE-desktop and
>> GNOME-desktop depend on? A meta package that depends on everything any
>> desktop should have.
>
> I'm not sure if that's the right
Wookey writes:
> +++ Neil Williams [2012-03-26 09:17 +0100]:
>> Therefore packaging takes no time at all, it is always fully complete
>> before the code itself is even worth evaluating as useful to Debian.
>> The packaging is part of my test harness.
>
> You are only looking at this from the upst
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 14:08:33 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Would there not be some advantage to making dpkg-buildpackge the
> interface for building? (Not dropping the debian/rules interface,
> of course.) This would permit the automatic setting of all the
> host- and build-related variables w
]] Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
Hi,
> What you think about extending this GSoC project to also implement the
> translation from systemd unit files to upstart ones? it is worth ?
My interest in translating systemd units to sysvinit scripts is because
it'll enable us to have higher-quality init scr
Vincent Lefevre writes:
> On 2012-03-29 13:07:56 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Well, it seems like you should file bugs if you can, because a lot of
>> these are not universal problems and therefore probably aren't known
>> issues.
> I did several months ago:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
On 30/03/12 12:29, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> I don't know what's going on exactly, but from the logs, it seems
> that when suspending, the connection is ended (as expected), but
> then, wicd tries to reconnect, and this may interrupt the suspend.
Check that you don't have GLAN/WLAN or something lik
Samuel Thibault writes:
> Russ Allbery, le Thu 29 Mar 2012 23:41:40 -0700, a écrit :
>> It's focused on being clean, supportable, and fully integrated with
>> Linux capabilities, *not* to solving everyone's use case, even to the
>> detriment of being universal.
> So that directly conflicts with
On 30/03/12 08:18, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
>
>> > On 20/03/12 07:14, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>>> > > FWIW, I have a proposal for a GSoC task this year to write a
>>> > > systemd-to-initscript converter,
>>> > > http://wiki.debian.org/SummerOfCode2012/Projects#SysV-in
Package: wnpp
Owner: YOSHIDA Tomohiro
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: sdic-inline-el
Version : 0.4.5.1
Upstream Author : khiker
* URL or Web page : http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/sdic-inline.el
* License : GPL3
Description : Emacs inline interface for Japanese di
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 02:39:17PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> > If an ITP remains open without comment for
> > more than a month, the chances that there will ever be an upload to
> > close it are close to zero.
>
> That may be true in an 'averages' sense, but there are old open ITPs
> with a lot of w
+++ Neil Williams [2012-03-26 09:17 +0100]:
> Therefore packaging takes no time at all, it is always fully complete
> before the code itself is even worth evaluating as useful to Debian.
> The packaging is part of my test harness.
You are only looking at this from the upstream's point of view. Mos
]] Samuel Thibault
> > The maintenance of systemd is actually quite the opposite of a standard.
>
> That sentence is quite frightening.
Is it? It's not like the maintenance of the kernel, KDE or GNOME is
done in the manner you maintain a standard. Heck, probably just about
no software in Debia
+++ peter green [2012-03-29 20:06 +0100]:
> >Now, you can build packages without using dpkg-buildpackage by calling
> >rules directly, and in that case the rules file would need to call
> >dpkg-architecture, but someone would have to convince me that that was
> >an interface worth supporting for no
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012, Neil Williams wrote:
> > Honestly I have never seen anyone doing cross-builds and calling
> > debian/rules manually.
>
> ... only because it *always* fails
>
> I have longed for such support myself at times. It is incredibly
> frustrating to see a cross-build fail 90% of
On Mar 30, 2012 8:40 AM, "Goswin von Brederlow" wrote:
>
> Hopefully dpkg-buildpackage will stop setting those varibales at some
> point so sources that wrongfully depend on the variables being set
> actualy break.
Already happened in version 1.16.1 (#560070).
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 09:58:41PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 19:10:05 +0100, Wookey wrote:
>
> > Should a package depending on this behaviour build-dep on a particular
> > dpkg version? As it already works in build-essential in stable do the
> > same rules apply as ess
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 02:30:37PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Shouldn't there rather be a base-desktop that both KDE-desktop and
> GNOME-desktop depend on? A meta package that depends on everything any
> desktop should have.
I'm not sure if that's the right direction of dependency, conce
Wookey writes:
> +++ Raphael Hertzog [2012-03-29 21:06 +0200]:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Wookey wrote:
>> > Anyone know when this happened and what if any, the limitations are?
>> > It's certainly true in wheezy, squeeze, precise and oineiric.
>>
>> This has always been the case ever s
Jon Dowland writes:
> On 27/03/12 17:09, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
>> So what do others think?
>
> I think that we need to separate the notion of a debian desktop from
> the GNOME or KDE desktops. Synaptic is probably quite rightly not
> part of either, but I agree that a "default desktop" via ins
Ansgar Burchardt writes:
> Jean-Christophe Dubacq writes:
>> What about a dev. script that would be run in debian/ and would parse
>> debian/control and send the ITP? I can write that!
Yes please.
> The Perl group already has a script that does this: examples/get-itp
> in git.debian.org:/git/p
Andrei POPESCU writes:
> On Ma, 27 mar 12, 08:36:58, David Banks wrote:
>>
>> In the specific case of mosh, I have posted three RFS messages to
>> debian-mentors since filing the ITP, in addition to the creation of the
>> RFS bug after the sponsorship-requests procedure was announced, so the
>>
On 2012-03-30 08:39:38 +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
> > Well, wicd has its own bugs, such as preventing a laptop from
> > suspending.
> are you talking about a bug from 2008 that has been fixed for ages?
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/wicd/+bug/306210
No, this is not the same bug (in my case, wicd
On 2012-03-29 23:23:52 -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
> On Thursday, March 29, 2012 04:09:57, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > Well, wicd has its own bugs, such as preventing a laptop from
> > suspending.
>
> Hmm. That sucks. I'd like to debug why you're running into this. However
> I've been using wic
On 2012-03-29 13:07:56 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Well, it seems like you should file bugs if you can, because a lot of
> these are not universal problems and therefore probably aren't known
> issues.
I did several months ago:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637267
http://b
On 03/30/2012 03:38 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:13:55AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> On 03/24/2012 07:17 AM, Michael Banck wrote:
>>> This is a development list, please discuss user support issues or
>>> general usage questions on debian-user.
>> I don't see his rant aga
Russ Allbery, le Thu 29 Mar 2012 23:41:40 -0700, a écrit :
> systemd's goal wasn't to become a standard that supported things
> people were already doing.
There must be a misunderstanding somewhere, then, and that needs further
explanation: the feature comparison page produced by Lenhart says
exac
Hi Folks,
I'm looking for a Standard C Library compliance test suite. I'd prefer
an open source one, preferably with a license more liberal than GPL,
e.g. BSD or MIT, which is why I can't just use the tests in the glibc
sources.
Can anyone suggest projects that I should look at?
--
Regards
Pet
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:06:56 +0200
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Wookey wrote:
> > Well, perhaps I shouldn't (and indeed I'd like us to get to a point
> > where we don't), but currently, in practice, non-native builds need
> > other things setting in the environment anyway so even
40 matches
Mail list logo
