Russ Allbery, le Thu 29 Mar 2012 23:41:40 -0700, a écrit : > systemd's goal wasn't to become a standard that supported things > people were already doing.
There must be a misunderstanding somewhere, then, and that needs further explanation: the feature comparison page produced by Lenhart says exactly the converse, i.e. that systemd supports a lot of things that people were already doing (console configuration, socket listening, etc.). > The maintenance of systemd is actually quite the opposite of a standard. That sentence is quite frightening. > It's focused on being clean, supportable, and fully integrated with Linux > capabilities, *not* to solving everyone's use case, even to the detriment > of being universal. So that directly conflicts with making it a default init implementation. I have to say I'm now quite a bit lost as to what systemd is supposed to be. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120330091158.ga4...@type.bordeaux.inria.fr
