Am Donnerstag, den 23.02.2012, 18:46 +0200 schrieb Timo Juhani
Lindfors:
> Josselin Mouette writes:
> > (We even have a patch to allow only a subset of packages but it is
> > unfortunately a bit too hackish.)
>
> Would be really nice to have some standard sets available (think
> "browser extensi
retitle 661241 vlc probably using wrong sound output by default (but not clear
from reporter)
reassign 661241 vlc
tag 661241 moreinfo
severity 661241 minor
submitter 661241 Mikko Koho
thanks
Mikko Koho: I'm guessing as to what your problem is, but you're going
to have to provide more information
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:32:18 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for a way to enable non-root users to install packages on
> their local machines, but not removing/purging them.
Well, perhaps an option (which also allows removal) is what used to be
called klik, but wha
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:12:09 +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> >The easiest way to do this is to run
> > cme fix dpkg-copyright
> >(and check the results, of course.)
> is lintian check not enough ?
Since copyright-format 1.0, and also the implementations in cme and
lintian are quite new, I sugge
[Yay for replying nearly a year later. Sorry about that, I completely missed
your email.]
Michael Vogt wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 01:35:23AM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> P.S. apt also provides a "mirror" method (just like http, ftp, etc) but I
>> consider it to be suboptimal and a poor
I demand that Toni Mueller may or may not have written...
> On 02/18/2012 11:48 AM, Thomas Koch wrote:
>> What about a debhelper script that receives an URL (or set of mirror
>> URLs) and a SHA1 and does the download and check?
> If you're going this way, try to peek at the *BSD's ports systems,
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 17:24, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Maybe the solution isn't event base or dependency based. Maybe the
> right solution is event based and dependency based.
In one sense this is obviously right. Any solution has to respond to
various kinds of events and has to be able to
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Svante Signell
wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 21:03 +0200, Uoti Urpala wrote:
>> On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 17:36 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> > Uoti Urpala writes:
>
>> I don't think it's an accident that this discussion came up in
>> the context of kFreeBSD.
On 26/02/12 19:17, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 20:20:16 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Version 1.0 of the machine-readable format for debian/copyright files (the
culmination of the DEP-5 process) has now been published. The canonical
URL (and also the URL to use in the Format fiel
On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 21:03 +0200, Uoti Urpala wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 17:36 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Uoti Urpala writes:
> I don't think it's an accident that this discussion came up in
> the context of kFreeBSD. Extra hardware architectures typically require
> a lot less ef
On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 17:36 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Uoti Urpala writes:
>
> > I think it's quite arrogant of BSD users to expect others to work to
> > support their systems. The BSD userbase is small enough that most
> > projects have alternative things to work on that help a lot mor
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 20:20:16 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Version 1.0 of the machine-readable format for debian/copyright files (the
> culmination of the DEP-5 process) has now been published. The canonical
> URL (and also the URL to use in the Format field in such files) is:
> http://www.deb
On 02/26/2012 03:00 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
lintian 2.5.5, recently uploaded in unstable, introduced a new tag
called "source-contains-waf-binary", which checks whether waf "binary"
is available in source packages. Please see [0] for further information.
We just added the tag to the dak nonfat
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kiwamu Okabe
* Package name: haskell-ghc-syb-utils
Version : 0.2.1.0
Upstream Author : Thomas Schilling
* URL : http://github.com/nominolo/ghc-syb
* License : BSD3
Programming Lang: Haskell
Description : Scrap Yo
On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 17:24 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Steve Langasek writes:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:55:46PM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 20:17, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:58:08AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >
>
Uoti Urpala writes:
> I think it's quite arrogant of BSD users to expect others to work to
> support their systems. The BSD userbase is small enough that most
> projects have alternative things to work on that help a lot more people
> than BSD support would. Trying to support extra platforms the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kiwamu Okabe
* Package name: haskell-io-choice
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Kazu Yamamoto
* URL : http://hackage.haskell.org/package/io-choice
* License : BSD3
Programming Lang: Haskell
Description : Choice
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:55:46PM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 20:17, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:58:08AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
>> >> Upstart also does not support Should-Start which makes it impossible to
Arno Töll writes:
> On 24.02.2012 17:07, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Josselin Mouette writes: And we write a
>> compatibility layer for non-Linux
>>> systems, that generates sysvinit-compatible scripts based on
>>> systemd services or upstart jobs.
> ...
>> So what you are saying is:
>>
>> L
Steve Langasek writes:
> Now, parts of this design were hard won, based on issues encountered in the
> first iteration of event-based booting in Ubuntu. Since that first
> iteration is present in the only Ubuntu LTS release to date that uses native
> upstart jobs, it's possible this is where you
Hi Steve,
On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 01:35 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 01:06:41PM +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> > If I understand correctly, the current Ubuntu version 1.4-0ubuntu8
> > works perfectly for Debian. Is there any reason to not upload this
> >
Sebastian Heinlein writes:
> APTDAEMON::Restrict::Users { "joe", "jane"; };
> APTDAEMON::Restrict::Tags::Allow { "interface::shell"; };
> APTDAEMON::Restrict::Tags::Deny { "interface::daemon"; };
>
> Would this be of any help to you?
Sounds like a great start.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
Am Donnerstag, den 23.02.2012, 18:46 +0200 schrieb Timo Juhani
Lindfors:
> Josselin Mouette writes:
> > (We even have a patch to allow only a subset of packages but it is
> > unfortunately a bit too hackish.)
>
> Would be really nice to have some standard sets available (think
> "browser extensi
Package: wnpp
Owner: tak...@debian.org
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: python-socketpool
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : Beno$(D+B(Bt Chesneau (benoitc)
Tarek Ziade (tarek)
* URL or Web page : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/socketpool
* License : M
Hi,
lintian 2.5.5, recently uploaded in unstable, introduced a new tag
called "source-contains-waf-binary", which checks whether waf "binary"
is available in source packages. Please see [0] for further information.
We just added the tag to the dak nonfatal autoreject list, that means
packages tri
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Or, as has been said countless times otherwise: kFreeBSD should not
> hinder the improvement of the Linux ports.
I agree. I also vaguely recall that we this was the consensus that we
reached at the kfreebsd BoF Debconf.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ..
Le dimanche 26 février 2012 à 13:05 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> “Demo version not suitable for production” sounds much like our kFreeBSD
> ports. (The Hurd port does not even go as far.)
To clarify, since I was asked on IRC: I’m not implying that we should
not *aim* for the goal of making
Le dimanche 26 février 2012 à 10:19 +0100, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> You are of course free to provide a systemd version that is accepted
> by upstream and works on all of our release architectures. Unless that,
> I consider systemd a demo version not suiteable for production, and
> nothing else.
* Uoti Urpala (uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi) [120226 00:29]:
> Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Uoti Urpala (26/02/2012):
> > > Is there reason to believe this would be a particular problem with
> > > systemd? Most of the controversy I've seen surrounding Poettering has
> > > been due to people resisting the
29 matches
Mail list logo
