Le mardi 01 novembre 2011 à 15:23 -0700, Josh Triplett a écrit :
> Those packages do not provide the NetworkManager DBus interface expected
> by other components of GNOME.
And anyway, why care? Metapackages are not a supermarket.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `'
`-
signature.asc
On 11/01/2011 11:23 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>> And I believe that NM should not be something gnome should depend on as
>> there are various other ways to configure your network. Imho it should
>> Recommend network-manage | wicd-gtk | similar-tools-if-they-exist.
>
> Those p
Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> And I believe that NM should not be something gnome should depend on as
> there are various other ways to configure your network. Imho it should
> Recommend network-manage | wicd-gtk | similar-tools-if-they-exist.
Those packages do not provide the NetworkManager DBus interfa
Steve McIntyre wrote:
> I'd like to help, but I may take a while to find time for it...
I would be glad to have you, but there's still room for people with more
time than us..
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Joey Hess wrote:
>
>I've been maintaining debmirror since we lost fjp. But moving to a cabin
>with dialup internet shortly after adopting a mirror program turns out
>to be a bad idea for developing it (though a nice use-case for using
>it). So I'm seeking comaintainer(s). All that's needed is basic
Josselin Mouette writes ("Re: Bug#645656: network-manager in Gnome"):
> Le mardi 01 novembre 2011 à 13:42 +, Ian Jackson a écrit :
> > Is there some other metapackage that can be installed to get a useful
> > Gnome system but without n-m ?
>
> Yes: gnome-session or gnome-fallback-session shou
Jon Dowland writes ("Re: Bug#645656: network-manager in Gnome"):
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 02:56:53PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > We should do it when we judge that the benefits are worth the costs.
> > In this particular case the costs seem to be minimal. There isn't
> > even a direct patch-car
> Jon Dowland writes:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 02:56:53PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> We should do it when we judge that the benefits are worth the costs.
>> In this particular case the costs seem to be minimal. There isn't
>> even a direct patch-carrying cost, since the dependency
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 10:21:04AM -0400, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 01:42:47PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Yes, that much is obvious. So the answer is that there is no harm in
> > actually removing network-manager.
>
> There is harm in diverging from upstream. We're a
Le mardi 01 novembre 2011 à 13:42 +, Ian Jackson a écrit :
> Is there some other metapackage that can be installed to get a useful
> Gnome system but without n-m ?
Yes: gnome-session or gnome-fallback-session should now contain the
actual dependencies for a minimal desktop to actually work.
On 11/01/2011 05:54 PM, Florian Reitmeir wrote:
[...]
> i believe a way of installing network-manager, but disabling it
> completly would be enough for many people.
Although harddisk space is cheap these days, this should not be the preferred
way.
--
Bernd Zeimetz
On 11/01/2011 03:21 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 01:42:47PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> Yes, that much is obvious. So the answer is that there is no harm in
>> actually removing network-manager.
>
> There is harm in diverging from upstream. We're a software
> distribu
On 11/01/2011 04:46 PM, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 02:56:53PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> We should do it when we judge that the benefits are worth the costs.
>> In this particular case the costs seem to be minimal. There isn't
>> even a direct patch-carrying cost, since the dep
> Matthias Klumpp writes:
[…]
> It would be very nice, if ftpmasters could tell if they would accept
> a new format in the archive or if we should stay with RFC822 which is
> used for nearly everything else already.
>> Note that the same rationale stands for all metadata to be
>> event
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 02:56:53PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> We should do it when we judge that the benefits are worth the costs.
> In this particular case the costs seem to be minimal. There isn't
> even a direct patch-carrying cost, since the dependency is expressed
> in our own control files.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jan Hauke Rahm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
musique is the new name of minitunes which is in unstable and testing at
the moment. I maintain it myself.
Unfortunately, upstream changed the name of minitunes to musique and
released a
Michael Gilbert escreveu isso aí:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
> > Is there anyone that would like to mentor me for a while to help me get
> > started? I'm quite interested in solving this problem.
>
> You can certainly work on anything in Debian (including this) and
Stefano Zacchiroli writes ("Re: Bug#645656: network-manager in Gnome"):
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 01:42:47PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Yes, that much is obvious. So the answer is that there is no harm in
> > actually removing network-manager.
>
> There is harm in diverging from upstream. We'
Laurent Bigonville writes ("Bug#645656: network-manager in Gnome"):
> Well as already said, gnome-core meta-package depends on official core
> GNOME modules, which network-manager is part of. If you don't want to
> install network-manager, don't install gnome-core meta-package.
Is there some other
Russ Allbery writes ("Re: Minified files and source code requirement"):
> Paul Wise writes:
> > What is the preferred form for modification for a work (aka source) is
> > highly context-dependent.
>
> I'd like to poke a little bit at the assumption that these two things are
> the same and that De
Le Tue, 1 Nov 2011 12:31:26 +,
Ian Jackson a écrit :
> Josselin Mouette writes ("Bug#645656: network-manager in Gnome"):
> > Le lundi 31 octobre 2011 à 16:37 +, Ian Jackson a écrit :
> > > I agree with the original submitter of this bug that
> > > network-manager needs to be optional. I
On 11/01/2011 01:31 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Josselin Mouette writes ("Bug#645656: network-manager in Gnome"):
>> Le lundi 31 octobre 2011 à 16:37 +, Ian Jackson a écrit :
>>> I agree with the original submitter of this bug that network-manager
>>> needs to be optional. In particular, gnome-c
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
I request an adopter for the ipplan package.
The long description is:
IPplan is an administrative tool for ISPs and network service companies.
It goes beyond IP address management to provide DNS administration,
configu
Hi,
On 01/11/11 11:09, Дмитрий Матросов wrote:
> Now in debian squeeze ownership of /var/lib/transmission-daemon folder is set
> to 'root:root'
> but, i think, it should be set to 'debian-transmission:debian-transmission'.
> Also, i think that home folder of user 'debian-transmission' should al
Josselin Mouette writes ("Bug#645656: network-manager in Gnome"):
> Le lundi 31 octobre 2011 à 16:37 +, Ian Jackson a écrit :
> > I agree with the original submitter of this bug that network-manager
> > needs to be optional. In particular, gnome-core should not pull it
> > in. What can be do
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Svante Signell wrote:
> I wonder if there is a Debian mailing list related to gnuradio/sdcc
> issues?
Perhaps it would be best to file a bug?
Some related lists:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-embedded/
http://lists.debian.org/debian-hams/
--
bye,
pabs
http://
Hi,
I wonder if there is a Debian mailing list related to gnuradio/sdcc
issues?
Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1320147213.3990.84.ca...@s149
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Víctor Seva"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: gpaste
Version : 1.6
Upstream Author : Marc-Antoine Perennou
* URL : https://github.com/Keruspe/GPaste/
* License : GPL3
Programming Lang: Va
Hi.
Now in debian squeeze ownership of /var/lib/transmission-daemon folder is set
to 'root:root'
$ ls -la /var/lib/transmission-daemon/
total 16
drwxr-xr-x 4 rootroot4096 Nov 1 13:41 .
drwxr-xr-x 80 rootroot4096 Nov 1 13:41 ..
drw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi,
I am a bit tied up with real life and would like someone to take the
maintainance of curl. There is a new upstream version but otherwise the
package is in good shape. The packaging is versioned controlled using
git
Hi,
On Tue, 01 Nov 2011, Luk Claes wrote:
> On 11/01/2011 08:58 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le lundi 31 octobre 2011 à 13:10 +, Jonathan Wiltshire a écrit :
> >> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 08:49:01PM +0200, Frank lin Piat wrote:
> >>> Specious "depends" relationship [AFAICT]:
> >>> backint
On 11/01/2011 08:58 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 31 octobre 2011 à 13:10 +, Jonathan Wiltshire a écrit :
>> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 08:49:01PM +0200, Frank lin Piat wrote:
>>> Specious "depends" relationship [AFAICT]:
>>> backintime-gnome - GNOME front-end for backintime
>>>
Le lundi 31 octobre 2011 à 13:10 +, Jonathan Wiltshire a écrit :
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 08:49:01PM +0200, Frank lin Piat wrote:
> > Specious "depends" relationship [AFAICT]:
> > backintime-gnome - GNOME front-end for backintime
> > backintime-kde- KDE front-end for backinti
33 matches
Mail list logo
