On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 01:29:33PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> What should I do with this bug?
> I did build a version for unstable, but I am not convinced this change
> is needed for unstable.
> I am doubtful it will get accepted in stable, because it isn't fixing
> a grave bug.
I would recommend
**Snoring/Sleeping Problems**
Start Getting a Great nights sleep with "Natures Sleep
Formula"
Visit our link below:
http://www.miraclesleep.info
To Unsubscribe from our list Email us at nom...@miraclesleep.info
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 790002
San Antonio, TX 78279-0002
--
To UNSU
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joenio Costa
* Package name: libcatalyst-controller-actionrole-perl
Version : 0.15-1
Upstream Author : Florian Ragwitz
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Catalyst-Controller-ActionRole/
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
Hello debian-devel,
What should I do with this bug?
I did build a version for unstable, but I am not convinced this change
is needed for unstable.
I am doubtful it will get accepted in stable, because it isn't fixing
a grave bug.
I am not sure it is appropriate for backports, because the change
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011, Philipp Kern wrote:
> I.e. I think we should still allow non-buildd binaries, e.g. for
> those cases you mentioned.
Non-buildd binaries should still be allowed, but they should be
followed immediately by a binNMU. [Are there any cases where we
wouldn't want to rebuild the pack
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 19:38:03 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Are you saying they cannot be bootstrapped with older versions (which
> are already in the archive)??!
By definition if they need to be manually bootstrapped it's because
their build dependencies are not available. The usual cases for that
a
Tollef Fog Heen writes:
> ]] Sven Hoexter
>
> | On the other hand there are all these packages in stable with broken
> | Vcs fields now. Still not nice but assuming that most contributions
> | will be based on what's in unstable that might be bearable.
>
> What VCS fields are broken?
Neither th
Harald Dunkel writes:
> On 06/06/11 07:06, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I still think this whole conversation is based on a false premise. I
>> think the original request originated from a belief that there is some
>> separable part of "core" Debian which could be held stable, and that
>> keeping that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/06/11 07:06, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> I still think this whole conversation is based on a false premise. I
> think the original request originated from a belief that there is some
> separable part of "core" Debian which could be held stable, and
Hi,
Philip Ashmore (06/06/2011):
> While trying to build QT 4.8.0 technology preview I had occasion to
> search for openvg.h.
while it would be nice to have a functional packages.debian.org, I
probably should be sharing that (at least in the meanwhile):
# apt-get install apt-file
$ apt-file
Hi there.
While trying to build QT 4.8.0 technology preview I had occasion to
search for openvg.h.
According to
http://packages.debian.org/search?suite=wheezy§ion=all&arch=amd64&searchon=contents&keywords=openvg.h
it's not in Wheezy/amd64, and yet there it is in libopenvg1-mesa-dev.
Is there
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "John T. Nogatch"
* Package name: hamexam
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Name
* URL :
https://launchpad.net/~jnogatch/+archive/hamexam?field.series_filter=
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: awk, sh
Description
On 06/06/2011 10:16 AM, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 11:20:07 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 04:18:34PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
The main decision which needs to be made is whether, as a project, we
want source only uploads or
2011/6/6 Guillem Jover :
> On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 14:24:52 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> Guillem Jover dixit:
>> > pkg-config --cflags libbsd-overlay
>>
>> pkg-config is a GNU abomination and not used by BSD projects.
>
> I disagree with the abomination part,
Just for completeness, I disagree w
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 14:24:52 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Guillem Jover dixit:
> > pkg-config --cflags libbsd-overlay
>
> pkg-config is a GNU abomination and not used by BSD projects.
I disagree with the abomination part, but in any case do you have a
better alternative with equivalent func
On Mon, June 6, 2011 12:09, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Sven Hoexter
>
> | On the other hand there are all these packages in stable with broken
> | Vcs fields now. Still not nice but assuming that most contributions
> | will be based on what's in unstable that might be bearable.
>
> What VCS fields
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 09:03:00 +, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2011-06-06, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I think this was mentioned in some previous incarnation of this
> > discussion, but throwing away debs unconditionally, or at least w/o
> > having a way to specify they must not be thrown away is go
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Timo Juhani Lindfors
* Package name: qi
Version : 20100107
Upstream Author : OpenMoko inc.
* URL : http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Qi
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: C, assembler
Description : lightweight bootlo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessio Treglia
* Package name: grilo
Version : 0.1.15
Upstream Author : The Grilo Team
* URL : http://live.gnome.org/Grilo
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Grilo framework
Grilo is a framework
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessio Treglia
* Package name: grilo-plugins
Version : 0.1.15
Upstream Author : The Grilo Team
* URL : http://live.gnome.org/Grilo
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Grilo framework plugins
Gril
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:09:41PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
Hi,
> What VCS fields are broken?
Oh I see for gitweb and git://git.d.o everything is already in place and
svn.d.o redirects for /wsvn/ and others are already on the todo list. Sorry
for the noise and false claims.
Sven
--
And I
]] Sven Hoexter
| On the other hand there are all these packages in stable with broken
| Vcs fields now. Still not nice but assuming that most contributions
| will be based on what's in unstable that might be bearable.
What VCS fields are broken?
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessandro Ghedini
* Package name: libeio
Version : 3.9
Upstream Author : Marc Alexander Lehmann
* URL : http://software.schmorp.de/pkg/libeio.html
* License : BSD (2 clause) or GPL-2+
Programming Lang: C
Description
On 2011-06-06, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> - There seems to be consensus to go ahead with throw-away debs; they
>> require a bit of work though so either be patient or, better,
>> volunteer with FTP masters to help out with the implementation of the
>> remaining bits.
> I think this was mentione
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 10:24 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 11-06-06 at 09:18am, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 08:17:03AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 20:56:25 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > > The majority of published references
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 at 08:29:03 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> All these APIs and dynamic libraries are meant to provide backward
> compatibility.
You're asking for forward compatibility, though: making applications in
testing/main limit themselves to only doing things which already worked in
stabl
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: James Page
* Package name: libpam4j
Version : 1.4
Upstream Author : Kohsuke Kawaguchi
* URL : http://java.net/projects/libpam4j/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Java binding for libpam.so
T
On 11-06-06 at 09:18am, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 08:17:03AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 20:56:25 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > > The majority of published references to VCS repositories are URLs
> > > for anonymous access. Also regular
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:02:42AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi,
> if there is consensus to switch back for anonymous access, then it
> should be doable to also support the anonvcs-links, so that your
> modified checkout keeps working.
Sure but it would still mean that we first managed to b
Hi!
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 11:20:07 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 04:18:34PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > The main decision which needs to be made is whether, as a project, we
> > > want source only uploads or to throw away DD built non-all debs.
> > > There's
Hi,
Am Montag, den 06.06.2011, 09:18 +0200 schrieb Sven Hoexter:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 08:17:03AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 20:56:25 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > The majority of published references to VCS repositories are URLs for
> > > anonymous access. Also
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 08:17:03AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 20:56:25 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Hi,
> > The majority of published references to VCS repositories are URLs for
> > anonymous access. Also regular Alioth users will be more aware of the
> > Alioth reconfigu
* Adam Borowski [110606 01:15]:
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 01:18:43PM +0200, Emil Langrock wrote:
> > I played around a little bit with GCC's LTO [4]. It is really impressive
> > for
> > this kind of applications. I had a size reduction and speed increase with
> > the
> > tested applications. O
33 matches
Mail list logo
