Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jeroen Schot
* Package name: bmake-mk-files
Version : 20110505
Upstream Author : Simon J. Gerraty
* URL : http://www.crufty.net/help/sjg/mk-files.htm
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Make
Description : Portable
*CÔNG TY TNHH TM MÃ VẠCH NAM VIỆT***
* **Đị**a ch**ỉ** : **55 **Đườ**ng S**ố** 0**1,
P.7, Q.Gò V**ấ**p, TPHCM*
Điện thoại: 08.62955721-31; Fax:
08.62955621
*Web: namvietsg.com
Hi
Just to remember people that one can follow the status of the .la file
dependency_libs clearing goal at Andreas' overview page [1].
A package entry followed by nothing more than a colon (:) means that the
package ships an .la file with a cleared dependency_libs field.
A package entry that cont
On Wed, 25 May 2011, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> It also seems that repositories hosted in public_git don't show up on
> gitweb anymore. Example:
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/lucas/packaging-tutorial.git
> I agree that most of them should be moved to a packaging team, but
> sometimes it
]] Scott Kitterman
| Was there some discussion of this with Alioth users before it got
| changed?
No.
And while I apologise for the problems we've had with the migration, I'd
like to ask people to just accept some of the changes we've made even
though you think it makes URLs uglier. They're do
Hi,
On Wed, 25 May 2011, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> SRV records? Does alioth have any SRV records that might be useful in
> this context? I queried various combinations of 'git', 'svn',
> 'subversion', 'svnserve', 'alioth', 'anonscm', and 'http' in queries
> based on *._tcp.*.debian.org and didn't
]] Peter Samuelson
| [Tollef Fog Heen]
| > Yeah, this is a bit bad. It seems neither git nor svn supports SRV
| > records so I've set up proxying of svn and git for now. (That «for
| > now» means I'll likely turn it off once we have a stable release that
| > supports SRV records.)
|
| SRV reco
Ian Jackson writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow writes ("Re: Getting good bug reports"):
>> So everyone is allowed to write a frontend to report bugs via smtp. But
>> only reportbug is allowed to use http? That seems a bit stupid.
>
> No-one _wants_ to write a frontend to report bugs via smtp, and doi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ralf Treinen
* Package name: packup
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Mikoláš Janota, Joao Marques-Silva, Inês Lynce, and Vasco
Manquinho
* URL : http://sat.inesc-id.pt/~mikolas/sw/packup/
* License : GPL3+
Programming L
On Mi, 25 Mai 2011, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> You did ask and I answered correct. So if you do not want answers, do
> not ask!
Please see my post from 2010-08-27 on the bug report.
Then tell me where you have answered any of the quetions posed in the
thread.
End of line.
> Ps. Don't bother to go on
[Tollef Fog Heen]
> Yeah, this is a bit bad. It seems neither git nor svn supports SRV
> records so I've set up proxying of svn and git for now. (That «for
> now» means I'll likely turn it off once we have a stable release that
> supports SRV records.)
SRV records? Does alioth have any SRV rec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello Jonathan,
Am Mi den 25. Mai 2011 um 16:31 schrieb Jonathan Nieder:
> > I know I should not do so but I forward this answers to debian-devel
> > too
>
> Thanks for asking for the help of others. Honestly I see hot heads on
> both sides, and I
On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 08:17:51 AM Darren Salt wrote:
> I demand that Carsten Hey may or may not have written...
>
> [snip]
>
> > The third example with indirections would have advantages if one l10n
> > package contains the translations for multiple packages (which seems to
> > be planned).
I demand that Carsten Hey may or may not have written...
[snip]
> The third example with indirections would have advantages if one l10n
> package contains the translations for multiple packages (which seems to
> be planned).
... which is something which, as upstream for a few packages, I'm not ke
Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>On 05/25/2011 04:47 PM, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
>> What are you for a kind of troll!? [...]
>
>The only troll I can see here is you.
Will you all stop calling each other trolls please.
If you have something constructive to say, then say it. If you don't
then be quite. In an
Goswin von Brederlow writes ("Re: Getting good bug reports"):
> So everyone is allowed to write a frontend to report bugs via smtp. But
> only reportbug is allowed to use http? That seems a bit stupid.
No-one _wants_ to write a frontend to report bugs via smtp, and doing
so as a simple serverless
On Wed, 25 May 2011, Olivier Berger wrote:
> > If someone has specific feature requests of the BTS, they can be made
> > by filing wishlist bugs against bugs.debian.org or debbugs after
> > checking to make sure that the existing request doesn't already exist.
> > [If it does, feel free to add comm
Hi,
Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> I know I should not do so but I forward this answers to debian-devel
> too
Thanks for asking for the help of others. Honestly I see hot heads on
both sides, and I don't see much use in rebuking anyone here except for
their communication style.
As for the bug: unfortun
Le mercredi 25 mai 2011 à 16:39 +0200, Agustin Martin a écrit :
> On Tue, 24 May 2011 00:03:13 +0200 Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
>
>
> * Projects search box in http://alioth.debian.org/ seems to not be working.
>
+1, already reported in :
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail&group_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi Bernd,
Am Mi den 25. Mai 2011 um 15:59 schrieb Bernd Zeimetz:
> On 05/25/2011 04:47 PM, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> > What are you for a kind of troll!? Sorry about to be such direct. But I
> > never ever have seen any kind of help from your side. Neit
On 05/25/2011 04:47 PM, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> What are you for a kind of troll!? Sorry about to be such direct. But I
> never ever have seen any kind of help from your side. Neither on this
> bug nor on debian-devel.
The only troll I can see here is you.
You have been told that nobody else is able
On Tue, 24 May 2011 00:03:13 +0200 Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
> If you have a specific example of something that does not work, it can
> be fixed.
Hi,
Thanks Alioth maintainers for all the hard work you did for the migration.
As happens after every migration, some things may still be left. So
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Mi den 25. Mai 2011 um 13:33 schrieb Norbert Preining:
> tag 593706 +invalid +ignore +rubbish +forget +idontcare
[...]
> > Forgot to answer to the bt too...
>
> Not again this thread.
>
> By now about 20 emails and still no terminal log.
What a
Hi fellows,
Stephen Gran schrieb am 22.05.2011 12:27:
> > Some bits of the infrastructure are still being bolted back together,
> > and we expect to send further status updates as they happen.
>
My (NUT) team and myself would also be interested in certificate / CA (
ca.debian.org) information, an
Bernd Zeimetz writes:
> On 05/25/2011 01:30 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> I must admit that I prefer shorter URLs. Wouldn't it be possible to
>> continue using http://{git,svn}.debian.org/ instead (without
>> redirection)?
>>
>> Before: http://git.debian.org/?p=devscripts/devscripts.git
>> After:
Brian May writes:
> Some don't even have Internet access.
So, how do you propose reportbug should handle those? Send a fax?
Seriously, what problem do you have that isn't solved by
"reportbug --offline --output=foo"
?
Bjørn
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.
Ian Jackson writes:
> Brian May writes ("Re: Getting good bug reports"):
>> [ explanation of how reportbug is broken right now ]
>
> We could solve this if we can avoid the slippery slope problem.
>
> Or to put it another way, I would have no objection to an http
> submission interface to the BTS
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 23:51 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 21.05.2011, 21:41 +0200 schrieb Tshepang Lekhonkhobe:
> > On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 00:26 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2011, 12:26 -0500 schrieb James Vega:
> > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Be
On 05/25/2011 01:30 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I must admit that I prefer shorter URLs. Wouldn't it be possible to
> continue using http://{git,svn}.debian.org/ instead (without
> redirection)?
>
> Before: http://git.debian.org/?p=devscripts/devscripts.git
> After: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitw
On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 07:20:01 AM James Vega wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:46:11PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> > On 05/24/2011 01:00 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > > Am 23.05.2011 22:35, schrieb Roland Mas:
> > >> - anonymous read-only access to the repositories is available by HTTP
> >
I wrote:
> Brian May writes ("Re: Getting good bug reports"):
> > [ explanation of how reportbug is broken right now ]
>
> We could solve this if we can avoid the slippery slope problem.
>
> Or to put it another way, I would have no objection to an http
> submission interface to the BTS, provided
Brian May writes ("Re: Getting good bug reports"):
> [ explanation of how reportbug is broken right now ]
We could solve this if we can avoid the slippery slope problem.
Or to put it another way, I would have no objection to an http
submission interface to the BTS, provided that everyone understa
On Wed, May 25, 2011 13:20, James Vega wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:46:11PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>> On 05/24/2011 01:00 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> > Am 23.05.2011 22:35, schrieb Roland Mas:
>> >> - anonymous read-only access to the repositories is available by HTTP
>> >> from wagne
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 01:23:49PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 25/05/2011 13:20, James Vega wrote:
> > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:46:11PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> >> On 05/24/2011 01:00 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >>> Am 23.05.2011 22:35, schrieb Roland Mas:
> - anonymous read-only acc
On 25/05/11 at 07:20 -0400, James Vega wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:46:11PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> > On 05/24/2011 01:00 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > > Am 23.05.2011 22:35, schrieb Roland Mas:
> > >> - anonymous read-only access to the repositories is available by HTTP
> > >> from w
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
* Package name: librdf-microturtle-perl
Version : 0.001
Upstream Author : Toby Inkster
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/RDF-MicroTurtle/
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
Programming Lang: Perl
Descr
On 25/05/2011 13:20, James Vega wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:46:11PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>> On 05/24/2011 01:00 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> Am 23.05.2011 22:35, schrieb Roland Mas:
- anonymous read-only access to the repositories is available by HTTP
from wagner, at URLs
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:46:11PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> On 05/24/2011 01:00 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > Am 23.05.2011 22:35, schrieb Roland Mas:
> >> - anonymous read-only access to the repositories is available by HTTP
> >> from wagner, at URLs that look like
> >> http://anonscm.debi
On 05/24/2011 01:00 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 23.05.2011 22:35, schrieb Roland Mas:
>> - anonymous read-only access to the repositories is available by HTTP
>> from wagner, at URLs that look like
>> http://anonscm.debian.org/$scm/$project for $scm in arch bzr darcs git
>> hg;
Please prov
On Wed, 25 May 2011 11:08:41 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > > In our case, the cgi-script is not yet working:
> > > http://pkg-haskell.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/pet.cgi
> > > Is there something we have to do about it or is cgi still on your todo
> > > list?
> > Maybe check the paths in pet.con
Le mardi 24 mai 2011 à 09:54 -0700, Don Armstrong a écrit :
SNIP
>
> If someone has specific feature requests of the BTS, they can be made
> by filing wishlist bugs against bugs.debian.org or debbugs after
> checking to make sure that the existing request doesn't already exist.
> [If it does, fe
On Wed, 25 May 2011 10:48:55 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> [..]
>
> Yup, but I haven't looked further, since the fundamental question is
> still open, TTBOMK: PET needs a cache that's written by the vcs
> post-commit hook (i.e. on vasks) [and a cronjob] and that's read by
> the cgi (i.e. on wag
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 25.05.2011, 10:48 +0200 schrieb gregor herrmann:
> On Wed, 25 May 2011 10:10:23 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
>
> > > I notice that the http://.alioth.debian.org links are working
> > > again and it seems that these pages are delivered from vasks
> > In our case, the cgi-scr
On Wed, 25 May 2011 10:10:23 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > I notice that the http://.alioth.debian.org links are working
> > again and it seems that these pages are delivered from vasks
> In our case, the cgi-script is not yet working:
> http://pkg-haskell.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/pet.cgi
>
On Wed, 25 May 2011 09:25:37 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:35:00PM +0200, Roland Mas wrote:
> > We should now be in the phase where we pretend it's done, wait for the
> > complaints,
>
> It seems than cron jobs of users need to be reinstalled. This might not
> be a b
On 25/05/2011 00:17, Francesco Poli wrote:
> However the gitweb interface seems to have lost its fancy style sheet
> that used to be consistent with the Debian web site
> http://www.debian.org/
>
which is not a big loss, if you ask me :) Now, it's consistent with
Alioth's setup…
Regards,
--
Me
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 25.05.2011, 09:25 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> I notice that the http://.alioth.debian.org links are working
> again and it seems that these pages are delivered from vasks
In our case, the cgi-script is not yet working:
http://pkg-haskell.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/pet.cgi
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:35:00PM +0200, Roland Mas wrote:
> We should now be in the phase where we pretend it's done, wait for the
> complaints,
It seems than cron jobs of users need to be reinstalled. This might not
be a big deal but it might help to have a look into backups of old
crontabs.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jeremy Salwen
* Package name: sord-0
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : David Robillard
* URL : http://drobilla.net/software/sord/
* License : ISC License
Programming Lang: C99
Description : A lightweight C libra
Hi,
> override_dh_installinit:
> $stuff_to_manually_install_to_etc_init_apps
I am just about to make it this way for now. One question here: can I
override only the file installation path, I am interested in, instead
of doing manually for all the 100(0)+ files manually that the package
is
50 matches
Mail list logo
