On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 08:17:51 AM Darren Salt wrote: > I demand that Carsten Hey may or may not have written... > > [snip] > > > The third example with indirections would have advantages if one l10n > > package contains the translations for multiple packages (which seems to > > be planned). > > ... which is something which, as upstream for a few packages, I'm not keen > on (AFAIK, Ubuntu do this). Particularly if, as seems to be the case with > Ubuntu, this leads to translations not being passed upstream or, if they > are, they're passed without proper attribution (which I will reject with > prejudice). > > If they think that upstream should go and fetch translations from them, > well, I don't want to know: again, no obvious way to get > properly-attributed diffs. > > [snip]
That seems more than a little orthogonal to the question at hand. KDE ships translations this way, so translations for multiple packages is not just a code word for doing something that may benefit a derivative. Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201105251344.04917.deb...@kitterman.com
