Hello,
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 07:29:05 +0200
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Your limited knowledge is like jam. The less you have, the more you
> spread it.
Well, you have just confirmed this statement.
> What you actually like about ifupdown is that it cannot do anything
> but extremely trivial setup
Le mardi 05 avril 2011 à 02:08 +0400, Stanislav Maslovski a écrit :
> Well, that is not the question of how many, that is the question of
> can you do a given task or not with a given tool. NM is limited in all
> possible ways I can imagine, and also buggy. On the contrary, with
> ifupdown, one fo
Le mardi 05 avril 2011 à 14:31 +0200, Vincent Lefevre a écrit :
> For instance, imagine the average user who wants for Ethernet (eth0),
> to do the following automatically (for a laptop):
> 1. use some fixed IP address if there's some peer 192.168.0.1
> with some given MAC address;
There a
On 04/06/2011 01:55 AM, Carsten Hey wrote:
> * Luk Claes [2011-04-05 23:11 +0200]:
>> On 04/05/2011 11:05 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>>> Carsten Hey wrote:
* Steve Langasek [2011-04-04 19:37 -0700]:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 02:00:36AM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
> Guaranteeing that /bin/sh
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 05:15:15PM +0200, Vincent Caron wrote:
> 2/ It is suggested to update gnupg.conf with:
>
> personal-digest-preferences SHA256
> cert-digest-algo SHA256
> default-preference-list SHA512 SHA384 SHA256 SHA224 AES256 AES192 AES CAST5
> ZLIB BZIP2 ZIP Uncompressed
>
>
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Margarita Manterola
wrote:
> Please, *NEVER* do "fall" or "summer" or "winter".
>
> Remember that Debian is developed all around the world, and half the
> world has the opposite seasons that you have. You can say "December"
> and you have a month of leeway to then
* Luk Claes [2011-04-05 23:11 +0200]:
> On 04/05/2011 11:05 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > Carsten Hey wrote:
> >> * Steve Langasek [2011-04-04 19:37 -0700]:
> >>> On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 02:00:36AM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
> * Find a sane solution for managing /bin/sh. Currently diversions
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 620957 wnpp
Bug #620957 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [general] general:
Would you be so kind to include Frandom in the Debian Repositories?
Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'wnpp'.
> retitle 620957 RFP: frandom: kernel module for gener
reassign 620957 wnpp
retitle 620957 RFP: frandom: kernel module for generating PRNG data
thanks
On 05-Apr-2011, Ruben wrote:
> I would like to see Frandom in the Debian repositories. Frandom is a
> kernel module for pseudo-random data generation, much as random and
> urandom, but works incredibly
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011, Jan Dittberner wrote:
> * Group membership information
> ssh merkel.debian.org id jandd
echo -n 'uid: ' && read uid && ldapsearch -LLL -x -h db.debian.org -b
dc=debian,dc=org "uid=$uid" supplementaryGid
On any host. On debian.org machines you need not use -h and -b.
wea
On 4/5/2011 2:47 PM, Russell Coker wrote:
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Daniel Gary wrote:
I'm not arguing that, I fully expect the kernel to use it to swap *if
needed*.
And if this was 20MB of swap, or maybe 100MB, ok, sure, the kernel might
be swapping old pages out, but 300MB+ swapping out in 2.6.26-2
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> sorry for a blunt follow-up -- wouldn't making /var/run writable by
> regular mortals ask for security concerns if an attacker starts
> pre-creating files/pipes trying to steal the communications of
> daemons spawned by root or just ruin some data o
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Daniel Gary wrote:
> I'm not arguing that, I fully expect the kernel to use it to swap *if
> needed*.
> And if this was 20MB of swap, or maybe 100MB, ok, sure, the kernel might
> be swapping old pages out, but 300MB+ swapping out in 2.6.26-2 where 0MB
Using more memory for
I'm not arguing that, I fully expect the kernel to use it to swap *if
needed*.
And if this was 20MB of swap, or maybe 100MB, ok, sure, the kernel might
be swapping old pages out, but 300MB+ swapping out in 2.6.26-2 where 0MB
swapped out in 2.6.26-1, and I can't find anything in the kernel.org
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 13:14:01 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 09:41:13 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
>
> > * Package name: evtest
> > Version : 1.27
> > Upstream Author : Peter Hutterer
> > * URL : http://cgit.freedesktop.org/evtest/
> > * License
On 05/04/2011 21:15, Daniel Gary wrote:
> I have, but fixing monitoring to suit edge cases created from a recent upgrade
> doesn't make the edge cases non-issues.
>
> This is still an issue whether you want to hide it under nagios or not,
I do not understand the issue. You have some swap and you
On 04/05/2011 11:05 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Carsten Hey wrote:
>> * Steve Langasek [2011-04-04 19:37 -0700]:
>>> On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 02:00:36AM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
>
* Find a sane solution for managing /bin/sh. Currently diversions are
used, which looks like the wrong
Carsten Hey wrote:
> * Steve Langasek [2011-04-04 19:37 -0700]:
>> On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 02:00:36AM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
>>> * Find a sane solution for managing /bin/sh. Currently diversions are
>>>used, which looks like the wrong tool for this job to me. There are
>>>also some r
I have, but fixing monitoring to suit edge cases created from a recent
upgrade doesn't make the edge cases non-issues.
This is still an issue whether you want to hide it under nagios or not,
so I'd appreciate a little more assistance in finding the problem beyond
"fixing nagios".
If you go the
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 19:09:08 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 09:41:24 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:14:12PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > Luk Claes (04/04/2011):
> > > > The most obvious reason to not degrade bash to Priority: important
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 11:25:44AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> Lintian error (and an ftpmaster REJECT) if debhelper compat 9 is set
> with no ${misc:PreDepends} set because that prevents the
> multiarch-support addition. A failure to convert ${misc:PreDepends} to
> multiarch-support would be a de
Your message dated Tue, 5 Apr 2011 19:45:28 +0100
with message-id <20110405184528.gx2...@decadent.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#620993: general: Lenny 2.6.26-2 has noticably
increased swap usage, tho not swap thrashing
has caused the Debian Bug report #620993,
regarding general: Lenny 2.6.26-2
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 11:12:29AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 at 11:12:54 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 12:36:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Specifically, the plan is that any package in wheezy shipping a runtime
> > > library in a multiarc
#include
* Kelly Clowers [Mon, Apr 04 2011, 02:06:01PM]:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 07:29, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> > I don't consider myself 'stupid user', but I haven't yet been able to
> > put my laptop on wpa network without the use of network manager.
>
> I never did get nm or wicd to work. Only
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 04:18:22PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Steve Langasek [110404 19:22]:
> > If login worked consistently in the face of the configured shell going
> > missing (automatically falling back to /bin/sh for root), then I think it
> > would be worthwhile to do the work neces
Package: general
Severity: normal
Swap usage prior to 2.6.26-2 upgrade was a relatively constant 0
Post 2.6.26-2 upgrade the usage is usually up into 300MB, not actively swapping
however and doesn't seem to be affecting performance, but nagios is none to
happy about swap being used.
The problem
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 05.04.2011, 17:48 + schrieb Philipp Kern:
> On 2011-04-05, Andrew O. Shadoura wrote:
> > Of course, man guessnet. Just few lines.
>
> Last time I looked guessnet was orphaned, though.
but still very useful and allowing me to have a great network setup
that, once set up,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 07:09:08PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 09:41:24 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:14:12PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > Luk Claes (04/04/2011):
> > > > The most obvious reason to not degrade bash to Priority: impor
Simon McVittie writes:
> * lintian should warn (error?) if a binary package has libraries in a
> multiarch directory and doesn't pre-depend on multiarch-support
Yes, this is what we did for the X.org transition and it seemed to work
reasonably well.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)
On 2011-04-05, Andrew O. Shadoura wrote:
> Of course, man guessnet. Just few lines.
Last time I looked guessnet was orphaned, though.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.
Hello,
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 14:31:40 +0200
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> [About the general problem of documentation]
> The problem is to find the correct tools and the correct
> documentation. For instance, imagine the average user who wants for
> Ethernet (eth0), to do the following automatically (fo
Am 05.04.2011 19:03, schrieb Don Armstrong:
> On Tue, 05 Apr 2011, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Am 05.04.2011 17:30, schrieb Debian Bug Tracking System:
>>> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>>>
reassign 620458 general
>>> Bug #620458 [base-files] base-files: Please make /var/run wor
Package: dh-make
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
On 03/04/11 14:57, Mathieu Parent wrote:
> dh-make 0.58 install .la files by default
> (/usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/debianl/package-dev.install contains
> "usr/lib/*.la")
>
> Should we change this also?
Since policy discourages shipping .la files, and th
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 05.04.2011 17:30, schrieb Debian Bug Tracking System:
> > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> >
> >> reassign 620458 general
> > Bug #620458 [base-files] base-files: Please make /var/run world-writable
> > and sticky, like /var/lock an
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Carsten Hey wrote:
> We released in February 2011 and we want about one and a half year
> between a releases and the following freeze, so we freeze in fall
> 2012.
Please, *NEVER* do "fall" or "summer" or "winter".
Remember that Debian is developed all around
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 09:41:24 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:14:12PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Luk Claes (04/04/2011):
> > > The most obvious reason to not degrade bash to Priority: important
> > > is obviously that one needs to declare a dependency on bash w
Am 05.04.2011 18:29, schrieb Marco d'Itri:
> On Apr 05, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> Very bad idea imho, I'm strongly against it.
>> The point of /run is not to create a second /tmp, where everyone can write
>> into.
> Agreed, I really do not want to consider the security implications of a
> world-
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011, Jan Dittberner wrote:
> I changed an entry in the ddportfolioservice [1] to reflect the new location
> to
> lookup DD assigned debian.net domain names (Paul: thanks for the Wiki edit).
> There are some more merkel URLs that stopped working. Do you know whether
> there
> are r
* Bernd Zeimetz [2011-04-05 15:04]:
> On 04/04/2011 01:15 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>
> > most of the work is done by our upstreams, and by simply telling
> > them "we'll freeze PICK_YOUR_MONTH every even/odd year" will (in the long
> > term) improve quality of Debian *a lot* more than choosing
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 04:59:02PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> ifdown should not *need* to know how the interface was brought up.
> And given that many people apparently like ifup because they can
> change the active configuration without it interfering, it would be
> a good thing if ifdown could
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:14:12PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Luk Claes (04/04/2011):
> > The most obvious reason to not degrade bash to Priority: important
> > is obviously that one needs to declare a dependency on bash when
> > it's used in a package. Which means quite some packages will ne
sorry for a blunt follow-up -- wouldn't making /var/run writable by
regular mortals ask for security concerns if an attacker starts
pre-creating files/pipes trying to steal the communications of
daemons spawned by root or just ruin some data on the system by
symlinking against root-owned files?
O
On Apr 05, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Very bad idea imho, I'm strongly against it.
> The point of /run is not to create a second /tmp, where everyone can write
> into.
Agreed, I really do not want to consider the security implications of a
world-writeable {,/var}/run.
Programs which use /run are sup
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 06:34:18PM +0300, Andrew O. Shadoura wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 13:30:53 +0100
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > Why is that necessary? So far as I can see, the purpose of the state
> > files is:
> > - Let ifup refuse to reapply a configuration (even if it failed
Hello list,
I'm about to generate a new GPG keypair to supplement my old v3 1024R
as suggested by Gunnar Wolf as of 2010-09-14 [1] and I was following the
documentation on http://keyring.debian.org/creating-key.html .
I'm using GnuPG 1.4.11 from my Debian Wheezy, and a few things have
changed
Am 05.04.2011 17:30, schrieb Debian Bug Tracking System:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
>> reassign 620458 general
> Bug #620458 [base-files] base-files: Please make /var/run world-writable and
> sticky, like /var/lock and /tmp
> Bug reassigned from package 'base-files' to '
reassign 620458 general
thanks
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Package: base-files
> Version: 6.1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> /tmp and /var/lock currently allow writes by anyone, with the sticky bit
> set to only allow removal by the owner. Please consider doing the same
> for /var/run.
Hello,
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 13:30:53 +0100
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Why is that necessary? So far as I can see, the purpose of the state
> files is:
> - Let ifup refuse to reapply a configuration (even if it failed to
> apply it in the first place)
> - Allow ifdown to take shortcuts, which often
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 620458 general
Bug #620458 [base-files] base-files: Please make /var/run world-writable and
sticky, like /var/lock and /tmp
Bug reassigned from package 'base-files' to 'general'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions base-files/6.1.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kartik Mistry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: libgwibber
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Author : Ken VanDine
* URL : http://launchpad.net/gwibber
* License : LGPL-3
Programming Lang: C, Vala
* Steve Langasek [110404 19:22]:
> If login worked consistently in the face of the configured shell going
> missing (automatically falling back to /bin/sh for root), then I think it
> would be worthwhile to do the work necessary to remove bash from the
> essential set. But until then, the primary
Luk Claes (04/04/2011):
> The most obvious reason to not degrade bash to Priority: important
> is obviously that one needs to declare a dependency on bash when
> it's used in a package. Which means quite some packages will need to
> be changed.
What is the most obvious reason to degrade bash to P
On 04/04/2011 01:15 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> most of the work is done by our upstreams, and by simply telling
> them "we'll freeze PICK_YOUR_MONTH every even/odd year" will (in the long
> term) improve quality of Debian *a lot* more than choosing a random^Wperfect
> (and different) date for ev
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 02:31:40PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2011-04-04 17:31:18 +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 05:35:10PM +0530, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > It seems to be a common belief between some developers that users should
> > > have to read dozens
Your message dated Tue, 5 Apr 2011 13:32:40 +0100
with message-id <20110405123240.gt2...@decadent.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#620957: general: Would you be so kind to include
Frandom in the Debian Repositories?
has caused the Debian Bug report #620957,
regarding general: Would you be so kind
On 2011-04-04 17:31:18 +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 05:35:10PM +0530, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > It seems to be a common belief between some developers that users should
> > have to read dozens of pages of documentation before attempting to do
> > anything.
> >
> >
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 02:16:30PM +0300, Andrew O. Shadoura wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:56:15 +0100
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > > Does this imply that "fixing" ifupdown to query the state(s) via
> > > netlink instead of relying on state files would solve most of the
> > > problem
On 2011-04-05, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 13:22:29 +0200, Jan Dittberner wrote:
>> * Group membership information
>> ssh merkel.debian.org id jandd
> works on any debian.org machine.
Only on public/unrestricted hosts. On other hosts you only get a partial list
(i.e. those
Package: general
Severity: wishlist
Hello.
I would like to see Frandom in the Debian repositories. Frandom is a kernel
module for pseudo-random data generation, much as random and urandom, but works
incredibly fast.
It is currently unmantained. However, is still usefull. You can have a look in
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 13:22 +0200, Jan Dittberner wrote:
> I changed an entry in the ddportfolioservice [1] to reflect the new
> location to lookup DD assigned debian.net domain names (Paul: thanks
> for the Wiki edit). There are some more merkel URLs that stopped
> working. Do you know whether t
On 04/05/2011 05:21 AM, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 12:09:42PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 09:10:47AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>>> ]] Stanislav Maslovski
>>> d-i doesn't use ifupdown, it uses netcfg.
>>
>> Hm, okay, I was pretty sure J
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 12:12:09PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Monday, April 04, 2011 12:05:09 PM Neil McGovern wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 08:38:18AM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
> > > One thing that the release team already is improving is communication,
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > The
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 13:22:29 +0200, Jan Dittberner wrote:
> * MIA database information
> ssh merkel.debian.org /srv/qa.debian.org/mia/mia-query ja...@debian.org
>
s/merkel/qa/
> * Group membership information
> ssh merkel.debian.org id jandd
>
works on any debian.org machine.
Cheers,
J
Hello,
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 14:16:30 +0300
"Andrew O. Shadoura" wrote:
> Another thing is that they may be ignored when the interface
> isn't really 'up', as per kernel.
I mean, isn't up when doing ifup, of isn't down when doing ifdown.
--
WBR, Andrew
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
I changed an entry in the ddportfolioservice [1] to reflect the new location to
lookup DD assigned debian.net domain names (Paul: thanks for the Wiki edit).
There are some more merkel URLs that stopped working. Do you know whether there
are replacements on other Debian hosts? The URLs in quest
Hello,
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:56:15 +0100
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Does this imply that "fixing" ifupdown to query the state(s) via
> > netlink instead of relying on state files would solve most of the
> > problems?
> I expect so, but it would be a very big 'fix'.
Well, ifupdown will still need
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 09:41:13 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> * Package name: evtest
> Version : 1.27
> Upstream Author : Peter Hutterer
> * URL : http://cgit.freedesktop.org/evtest/
> * License : GPLv2
> Programming Lang: C
> Description : utility to m
Package: wnpp
Owner: tak...@debian.org
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libdata-amf-perl
Version : 0.09-1
Upstream Author : Daisuke Murase
* URL or Web page : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Data-AMF/
* License : Perl
Description : Perl module for serialize / deserial
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 11:47:01 +0100
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 11:25 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> [...]
> > Lintian error (and an ftpmaster REJECT) if a binary package (not just
> > a library) has multiarch paths without debhelper compat 9. (This
> > protects against uploading p
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 11:25 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
[...]
> Lintian error (and an ftpmaster REJECT) if a binary package (not just
> a library) has multiarch paths without debhelper compat 9. (This
> protects against uploading packages converted with tools like
> dpkg-cross -M -A (>= 2.6.3).)
[.
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 09:41 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > And we already have the 'iconv' and 'recode' commands to do conversion
> > between arbitrary character encodings.
>
> These are not character encodings, but specific fonts. See the
>
Steve Langasek writes:
> Yes, a user can do anything with ifconfig if his time has no value. I am
> happily using network manager on my laptop, because unlike ifconfig it's
> easy to configure for use on new wireless networks.
>
> I am not happy that network manager bypasses ifconfig to do this;
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 11:12:29 +0100
Simon McVittie wrote:
> * lintian should warn (error?) if a binary package has libraries in a
> multiarch
> directory and doesn't pre-depend on multiarch-support
>
> * lintian should perhaps also warn if a package uses debhelper compat 9
> and doesn't pre-d
* Steve Langasek [2011-04-04 19:37 -0700]:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 02:00:36AM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
> > Before bash or dash could be made non-essential in a clean way, there
> > are IMHO various things not mentioned up to now in this thread to fix:
>
> > * Fix #428189, either by adapting the
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 at 11:12:54 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 12:36:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Specifically, the plan is that any package in wheezy shipping a runtime
> > library in a multiarch directory should declare a Pre-Depends on the
> > metapackage 'multiar
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 12:36:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Specifically, the plan is that any package in wheezy shipping a runtime
> library in a multiarch directory should declare a Pre-Depends on the
> metapackage 'multiarch-support'.
And the dependency would be added by either dpkg-dev,
On 05/04/11 04:52, Russ Allbery wrote:
> dash doesn't support $LINENO, which is why it's not detected by Autoconf.
> The reason why it doesn't support $LINENO (it's intentional; we had a
> patch to add it that was then removed) is that the configure.ac files of
> many, many packages contain bashism
Ben Hutchings writes:
> On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 23:07 +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>> Josselin Mouette writes:
>> > Le jeudi 31 mars 2011 à 09:25 +0200, Vincent Danjean a écrit :
>> >> Martin F. Krafft started to implement a replacement of ifupdown that
>> >> is better designed. But, due to lack of ma
* Guillem Jover [2011-04-05 06:19 +0200]:
> On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 01:08:19 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > This appears to open up any accounts that have been deliberately
> > disabled by setting their shell to a nonexistent path. I know that's a
> > dumb way to disable an account, but that doesn'
Goswin von Brederlow writes:
> Lars Wirzenius writes:
>
>> * We can perhaps change debhelper to automatically add the
>> dependency, if it is missing. Since most packages use debhelper,
>> this might transition most of the packages automatically.
>
> I've beend thinking abo
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 09:36:14AM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 05:59:51PM +, Clint Adams wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 06:04:20PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> >> > What do others think of moving bash to imp
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 12:09:42PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 09:10:47AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > ]] Stanislav Maslovski
> >
> > | AFAICT, the main concerns with the current ifupdown-based installation
> > | process is that its suport of wireless networks
On 31.03.2011 22:16, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> You do need -lgomp.
>
> You normally don't (need to) link to gomp explicitly. My wild guess is:
> Dmitry used -fopenmp while compiling *.o, but not when linking the
> shared library.
Exactly! Thank you, Jakub, for nice guess.
AC_OPENMP() macro documentati
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 09:10:47AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Stanislav Maslovski
>
> | AFAICT, the main concerns with the current ifupdown-based installation
> | process is that its suport of wireless networks is very limited: only
> | WEP is supported, and there are problems with lost c
Jon Dowland wrote:
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 07:22:47PM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
It also can't do VLANs (.1q), bridges, bonds and all possible
permutations of the above. I'd speculate that it also wouldn't be able
to do things like 1k (or more) interfaces. It also doesn't support hooks
to be
On ma, 2011-04-04 at 20:32 +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> I happened to have access to a idle-ish fastish machine with a fresh-ish
> Debian mirror, so I wrote a script to unpack all binaries (for sid/main
> amd64), and then another script to grep for bash scripts (actually a
> pair of scripts). Wit
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 05:59:51PM +, Clint Adams wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 06:04:20PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> > What do others think of moving bash to important (required and important
>> > are part of the base system)?
>>
>> I t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
* Package name: evtest
Version : 1.27
Upstream Author : Peter Hutterer
* URL : http://cgit.freedesktop.org/evtest/
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: C
Description : utility to monitor input device
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 16:12:42 -0700
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 07:33:24PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > > >> Lintian already checks that *.la files don't contain the problematic
> > > >> dependency_libs setting.
>
> > > This apparently just isn't true. I could have sworn th
In other news for Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 08:15:55AM +0200, Bernhard R. Link has
been seen typing:
> But what many people[1] want is that you can make it work if you read some
> dozen pages of documentation.
Personally, what I want is a setup that does not drop all active network
interfaces during
]] Stanislav Maslovski
| AFAICT, the main concerns with the current ifupdown-based installation
| process is that its suport of wireless networks is very limited: only
| WEP is supported, and there are problems with lost connections. I am
| pretty sure that these problems may be addressed without
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 07:08:19AM +0100, Brett Parker wrote:
> On 05 Apr 00:55, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 10:03:12PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > > What I do not understand is WHY the Debian Project can not do an install
> > > in two steps. I mean installing the
92 matches
Mail list logo
