Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luke Faraone
* Package name: sushi
Version : 1.1.1
Upstream Author : Michael Kuhn
* URL : http://sushi.ikkoku.de/
* License : Two-clause BSD
Programming Lang: C, Python
Description : IRC suite operating via D-Bu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ivan Kohler
Owner: Ivan Kohler
* Package name: libbusiness-onlinepayment-ippay-perl
Version : 0.04
Upstream Author : Jeff Finucane
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Business-OnlinePayment-IPPay
* License : Perl
Prog
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ivan Kohler
Owner: Ivan Kohler
* Package name: libbusiness-onlinepayment-paymentech-perl
Version : 2.03
Upstream Author : Mark Wells
* URL :
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Business-OnlinePayment-PaymenTech/
* License : Pe
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ivan Kohler
Owner: Ivan Kohler
* Package name: libbusiness-onlinepayment-payflowpro-perl
Version : 1.01
Upstream Author : Phil Lobbes
* URL :
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Business-OnlinePayment-PayflowPro/
* License : P
Neil Williams a écrit :
> I did a form of that for Emdebian Crush (emrecent) which used
> edos-debcheck to see if the upload was going to break the repository
> prior to making the upload. [...]
Hum... interesting. If an upload is going to break the repository, dak
could indeed ask some kind of co
Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
>>> Preparing the transition in experimental is not always done and takes
>>> much more energy than such a system would take.
>> Why, actually?
>
> I don't an exhaustive answer but here are some points:
> 1/ you can't request bin-nmus of reverse-dependencies in experiment
You mistakenly replied to me instead of to the list. I'll fix that.
Quoting ceduardo on 2010-03-26 17:04:08:
> Thanks, this more information to my objetive. I am from Colombia, my
> native language is spanish.
I don't know why I said Portuguese instead of Spanish. Brain fart on my
part, likely.
2010/3/25 Brian Ryans :
> Quoting ceduardo on 2010-03-18 17:32:27:
>> What Do you developer tools sugges?
>
> Not a piece of software proper, but I, too, am learning programming and
> have found the book "The Art of Unix Programming" by Eric S. Raymond to
> be quite invaluable. I don't have an ISBN
Quoting ceduardo on 2010-03-18 17:32:27:
> What Do you developer tools sugges?
Not a piece of software proper, but I, too, am learning programming and
have found the book "The Art of Unix Programming" by Eric S. Raymond to
be quite invaluable. I don't have an ISBN, as I have the PDF version,
but a
OoO En ce début de soirée du jeudi 25 mars 2010, vers 21:06, Neil
Williams disait :
> Removing the tag without fixing dpkg to not require
> debian/source/format for source format 1.0 packages. That bug does need
> to be fixed. I've only altered a few of my packages in SVN - none of
> those
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Andrew Lee (李健秋)"
Owner: "Andrew Lee (李健秋)"
* Package name: libfm
Version : 0.1.9
Upstream Author : 洪任諭 Hong Jen Yee (PCMan)
* URL : http://pcmanfm.sourceforge.net/
* License : (GPL)
Programming Lang: (C)
Descripti
Raphael Hertzog schrieb am Friday, den 26. March 2010:
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > Raphael Hertzog schrieb am Friday, den 26. March 2010:
> > > lenny-backports needs a dak upgrade and formorer doesn't want to do it,
> > > maybe someone else should offer him to manage it for hi
Raphael Hertzog writes:
> I don't see any significant difference in the wording,
Excellent, then I succeeded. If the people who were upset think it's
better and you don't see a difference, that's exactly the balance that I
was trying to strike.
> the major change is the priority which simply m
I just tried to do an upgrade on testing & I,m getting several errors.
First snip of output is regarding unknown types. I have no idea what
this is but I seen it before.
SNIP-
Processing triggers for hicolor-icon-theme ...
Processing triggers for gnome-menu
On 2010-03-26, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Otherwise it might well be that the backports suite are going to be
> directly managed on ftp-master.debian.org. That way it's
> automatically mirrored, etc.
FWIW that's also the case for volatile. We're basically waiting for
ftp-master to do the integrati
Hi,
On Fri Mar 26, 2010 at 17:18:14 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Joerg Jaspert schrieb:
>
>> just a short notice for everyone out there who wants to upload or waits
>> for a package migration to testing:
>>
>> ries.debian.org, the host behind ftp-master.debian.org, has hardwa
Hi!
Joerg Jaspert schrieb:
just a short notice for everyone out there who wants to upload or waits
for a package migration to testing:
ries.debian.org, the host behind ftp-master.debian.org, has hardware
trouble, a failed memory module keeps resetting the machine at random
intervals.
A small
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: LI Daobing
* Package name: ibus-tegaki
Version : 0.3.1
Upstream Author : Mathieu Blondel
* URL : http://www.tegaki.org/
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: Python
Description : tegaki engine for IBus
IBus is an I
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> What is the use case of a default format if all packages provide
> debian/source/format ?
The default source format is required for backwards compatibility. I can't
simply make the build fail if debian/source/format doesn't exist!
But you're right tha
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Koch
Owner: Thomas Koch
* Package name: hbase
Version : 0.20.3
Upstream Author : Apache Foundation
* URL : http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/
* License : Apache 2
Programming Lang: Java
Description : random,
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog schrieb am Friday, den 26. March 2010:
> > lenny-backports needs a dak upgrade and formorer doesn't want to do it,
> > maybe someone else should offer him to manage it for him.
> Thats not true. What I said to you is that we won't upgrade
[ I find the tone of your mail needlessly aggressive, we're just
discussing an idea at this point and seeing if it's worth investing more
time into it ]
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> No, this can't be defined later. It's a central part. Would any new
> binary lead to a d
Não esqueça de mim...
"O amor deve ser como água, puro e cristalino, como a terra,
forte e bonito, como o ar, livre e solto... O amor é como os
teus olhos que me fascinam, como a tua boca, que faz delirar,
como tudo que lhe pertence, pois esse tudo foi tocado por suas
mãos delicadas e macias.
Raphael Hertzog schrieb am Friday, den 26. March 2010:
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> > Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> > > Note that the lintian message specifically requests to contact us if you
> > > decide to stick with 1.0 for such a technical reason. That's done that way
> > > s
On 25/03/2010 20:12, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> - I'm still undecided whether I will change the default format in
> dpkg-source but obviously once all packages provide
> debian/source/format, I will be able to make the change without much bad
> impact.
What is the use case of a default format
Hi!
Neil Williams schrieb:
Wouldn't a simpler method be to identify uploads that inadvertently
impair an ongoing transition and bump that one upload to experimental
or simply tell the DD not to upload to unstable?
[..]
Maybe extending dput functionality to check a file on a central server
tha
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:51:43 +0100
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> one of our biggest problems is dealing with transitions because they tend
> to get interdependant and it's thus very difficult to move packages from
> sid to testing. Also many transitions are badly managed by the maintainers
> who are r
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Pietro Abate
Owner: Pietro Abate
* Package name: libminisat2-ocaml
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Pietro Abate
* URL : http://github.com/abate/MiniSat-ocaml/tree/minisat2
* License : GPLv3
Programming Lang: Ocaml
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:32:21 +
Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:13:01AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> > The long tag description probably could be improved to make it clearer
> > that the intention isn't to be a cudgel.
>
> Unfortunately pretty much any lintian warning ends u
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 05:19:41PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 25.03.2010, 16:16 + schrieb Philipp Kern:
> > On 2010-03-25, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > I’d expect it to be much smoother for an organization that uses Debian
> > > tools and works with us to add missing fu
On 10:51 Fri 26 Mar , Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> To resolve the problems I suggest to serialize transitions in sid.
> First the archive should block package uploads to sid that would be
> starting a new transition (defining this in more details is left for
> later). Instead transitions should be
On 2010-03-26, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> That said I think those transition repositories are going to be more used
> (and thus tested) than experimental because they are targeted. Users who
> want to test the latest KDE or Gnome will happily add such a repository if
> its sole purpose is to contain
Raphael Hertzog writes:
> To resolve the problems I suggest to serialize transitions in sid.
This was already discussed a few times.
> First the archive should block package uploads to sid that would be
> starting a new transition (defining this in more details is left for
> later).
No, this ca
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:13:01AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> The long tag description probably could be improved to make it clearer
> that the intention isn't to be a cudgel.
Unfortunately pretty much any lintian warning ends up being a cudgel if
it's enabled by default since zero lintian warn
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 05:19:41PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Why is there no dak and wanna-build package? Are there plans to create
> such packages?
There used to be a dak package but it ended up lagging very badly behind
the actual dak code because it needed some database schema upgrades as
[ Not quite sure why you sent it to debian-release when I tried to have the
discussion on -devel only, anyway ]
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Philipp Kern wrote:
> [ Just a few quick thoughts. ]
>
> On 2010-03-26, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Multiple transitions will still end up mixed in sid if you pus
[ Bcc debian-release for info, discussion welcome on -devel ]
Hello,
one of our biggest problems is dealing with transitions because they tend
to get interdependant and it's thus very difficult to move packages from
sid to testing. Also many transitions are badly managed by the maintainers
who ar
On Fri Mar 26 10:11, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:17:30 +0100, Raphael Hertzog
> wrote:
> >My goal as dpkg maintainer is that Debian converts the maximum number of
> >source packages to the new source formats in the shortest timeframe. (You
> >might not share this goal but that's ano
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:17:30 +0100, Raphael Hertzog
wrote:
>My goal as dpkg maintainer is that Debian converts the maximum number of
>source packages to the new source formats in the shortest timeframe. (You
>might not share this goal but that's another matter)
Do you really need a tech ctte deci
Raphael Hertzog writes:
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Neil Williams wrote:
> > Now all I need is for dpkg to accept that the absence of
> > debian/source/format is declarative of source format 1.0.
>
> That's the case _for now_.
You seem to imply that the meaning of the above situation is subject to
ch
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> > Note that the lintian message specifically requests to contact us if you
> > decide to stick with 1.0 for such a technical reason. That's done that way
> > so that I can help resolve those problems. No later than this morni
Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> Note that the lintian message specifically requests to contact us if you
> decide to stick with 1.0 for such a technical reason. That's done that way
> so that I can help resolve those problems. No later than this morning I
> contacted the launchpad guys to allow new sou
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Neil Williams wrote:
> Now all I need is for dpkg to accept that the absence of
> debian/source/format is declarative of source format 1.0.
That's the case _for now_.
> packages don't need to be changed merely to state the obvious.
They need because the dpkg maintainers ha
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Steve Langasek wrote:
> If it's really so important to the dpkg maintainers that source format 1.0
> is declared, why doesn't dpkg-source -b *generate* this content
> automatically as part of the .diff.gz so that maintainers aren't being asked
> to take a manual action to asser
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:30:28 -0700
Russ Allbery wrote:
> this at this point. I've changed the severity to wishlist instead,
> which I think more accurately reflects the current severity of this
> request.
That's fair.
> N: missing-debian-source-format
> N:
> N: To allow for possible f
45 matches
Mail list logo
