Raphael Hertzog <hert...@debian.org> writes: > On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Neil Williams wrote: > > Now all I need is for dpkg to accept that the absence of > > debian/source/format is declarative of source format 1.0. > > That's the case _for now_.
You seem to imply that the meaning of the above situation is subject to change outside the power of the dpkg maintainers. If so, why would that be? If not, and the definition of those meanings is up to the dpkg maintainers, why would they ever want the above meaning to change? -- \ “The greatest tragedy in mankind's entire history may be the | `\ hijacking of morality by religion.” —Arthur C. Clarke, 1991 | _o__) | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8739znpiwd....@benfinney.id.au
