Quoting Kurt Roeckx (k...@roeckx.be):
> > * I don't think we need more than 2 of these. They are still
> > useful for servers or when some disaster happens in the GUI, but
> > who opens 6 console sessions nowadays?
>
> I still have 12 console sessions open, and use screen t
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 02:24:38PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:11:40PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 08:52:23PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > 2.1 This clause restricts how you can modify the software.
> > > Doing a simple modifica
Hi,
* Does upstart make things like dynamic allocation of VTs
possible?
Upstart doesn't do anything special WRT to VTs. You can constantly
respawn a getty on /dev/tty3, or you can constantly respawn openvt
getty, or you can run a script once saying "assign me a VT" and then
s
Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> As I said: I do not see a difference between a license that does not
> give me some right (or even tries to take away some rights copyright law
> does not take away) and a license which theoretically grant it but puts
> so many restrictions in it that one practically does
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ryan Kavanagh
* Package name : bangarang
Version : 1.0~beta1
Upstream Authors : Andrew Lake ,
Jani Huhtanen
* URL : http://gitorious.org/bangarang
* License : GPL3+
Programming Lang : C++
Desc
* David Claughton [091114 20:23]:
> AIUI you are allowed to run the program on your computer, assuming that
> the service cannot be connected to from a remote location (or you are
> the only person that can do so).
So I may not put that code into an smtp server, or a webserver or or or
without ge
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 03:45:11PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it's been a long-standing tradition on Linux to have 6 started getty
> processes, in tty1 to tty6. However this doesn't correspond anymore to
> the way we use our machines.
> * I don't think we need more than 2 of t
Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * David Claughton [091114 12:43]:
>> I agree this makes the license problematic and might make developers
>> choose to avoid working on AGPL code - however as I said above, all
>> licenses put some limits on what you can modify, some more than others,
>> at least if you w
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Hi,
>
> itâs been a long-standing tradition on Linux to have 6 started getty
> processes, in tty1 to tty6. However this doesnât correspond anymore to
> the way we use our machines.
> * I donât think we need more than 2 of these. They are still
> use
Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le samedi 14 novembre 2009 à 17:42 +0100, Bernhard R. Link a écrit :
* Josselin Mouette [091114 17:26]:
I guess you mean as long as there is no negociation between gdm and
whatever decides where gettys go?
GDM does try to use a VT that is not currently in use - althoug
Le samedi 14 novembre 2009 à 18:22 +0100, Bernhard R. Link a écrit :
> * Josselin Mouette [091114 17:58]:
> > > So gdm does not negotiate but just claims "first!".
> >
> > What else can it do? It has to manage its VTs for itself. Currently it
> > is simply forced to use the ones starting from tty
* Josselin Mouette [091114 17:58]:
> > So gdm does not negotiate but just claims "first!".
>
> What else can it do? It has to manage its VTs for itself. Currently it
> is simply forced to use the ones starting from tty7, but it is arbitrary
> and inconsistent.
There are those things called 'confi
On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 15:45 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Josselin Mouette wrote:
[...]
> > Le dimanche 08 novembre 2009 à 12:48 +0100, Luk Claes a écrit :
[...]
> >> - empathy not built on kfreebsd*
> >
> > It’s waiting on geoclue, which in turn needs disabling of gammu support
> > on !linux.
>
> T
Le samedi 14 novembre 2009 à 17:42 +0100, Bernhard R. Link a écrit :
> * Josselin Mouette [091114 17:26]:
> > > I guess you mean as long as there is no negociation between gdm and
> > > whatever decides where gettys go?
> >
> > GDM does try to use a VT that is not currently in use - although ther
* Josselin Mouette [091114 17:26]:
> > I guess you mean as long as there is no negociation between gdm and
> > whatever decides where gettys go?
>
> GDM does try to use a VT that is not currently in use - although there
> can be race conditions.
So gdm does not negotiate but just claims "first!".
Le samedi 14 novembre 2009 à 16:40 +0100, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> > * Does upstart make things like dynamic allocation of VTs
> > possible?
> > * Otherwise, shouldn’t we replace the getty processes started by
> > init by a small daemon that can allocate them as we
Josselin Mouette, le Sat 14 Nov 2009 15:45:11 +0100, a écrit :
> * I don’t think we need more than 2 of these. They are still
> useful for servers or when some disaster happens in the GUI, but
> who opens 6 console sessions nowadays?
Blind people and crazy people who always
* David Claughton [091114 12:43]:
> I agree this makes the license problematic and might make developers
> choose to avoid working on AGPL code - however as I said above, all
> licenses put some limits on what you can modify, some more than others,
> at least if you want to distribute the result.
Hi,
it’s been a long-standing tradition on Linux to have 6 started getty
processes, in tty1 to tty6. However this doesn’t correspond anymore to
the way we use our machines.
* I don’t think we need more than 2 of these. They are still
useful for servers or when some disaster happens
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Hi, and thanks for this much needed inventory. Most of the issues here
> were fixed this week.
>
> Maybe it’s time for a new review?
Note that it was only a list of the most obvious blockers. Things I did
not look at yet for the gnome transition are RC bugs for instance.
Hi, and thanks for this much needed inventory. Most of the issues here
were fixed this week.
Maybe it’s time for a new review?
Le dimanche 08 novembre 2009 à 12:48 +0100, Luk Claes a écrit :
> - gdl not built on hppa which prevents gnome-python-extras from migrating
Now built.
> - webkit not b
* Bill Allombert:
> = Text of the GR ===
> The Debian project resolves that softwares licensed under the GNU Affero
> General Public License are not free according to the Debian Free Software
> Guideline.
> = End of the text ==
I think this has to b
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Dario Minnucci (midget)"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: libalgorithm-permute-perl
Version : 0.12
Upstream Author : Edwin Pratomo
* URL :
http://search.cpan.org/~edpratomo/Algorithm-Permute-0.
* Mike Hommey:
> Stupid question: with this wording of the AGPL, who, in his right mind,
> will be licensing a DNS or POP server under this license ? (Except maybe
> someone who didn't read it)
Someone might take a GPLv3 project, make enhancements to it, publish
the combination under the AGPL, an
Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * David Claughton [091113 21:42]:
>> Now this could certainly involve more extensive modifications than you
>> might otherwise want to do, and you might well decide it's not worth the
>> effort. However I'm still not entirely convinced it makes the license
>> non-free.
>
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 12:48:11PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Hi
>
> Currently there are 4 rather big transitions going on, none of which is
> ready to transition. Following are the things that currently are an
> issue or that show why the 4 transitions are coupled:
>
> * xulrunner:
Sorry, I dela
* David Claughton [091113 21:42]:
> Now this could certainly involve more extensive modifications than you
> might otherwise want to do, and you might well decide it's not worth the
> effort. However I'm still not entirely convinced it makes the license
> non-free.
If the license makes running a
Su email ha sido eliminado de nuestra lista de distribucion
No volverá a recibir emails de nuestra parte
Webmaster i-digitalia.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
28 matches
Mail list logo
