On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:45:25PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> Again, this is not the language that the AGPL uses. It requires that
> "your modified version must prominently offer all users interacting with
> it remotely through a computer network" the source. Notice the text
> "your modifie
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Fabrice Coutadeur
* Package name: gmerlin-avdecoder
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Burkhard Plaum
* URL : http://gmerlin.sourceforge.net/avdec.html
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : general pu
Hi
This is Bhaskar Sinha , busy quizzing and suggest you do the same.
I am now an active quizzer on http://www.gnosiomania.mnnit.ac.in/qod/.
Its really worth checking out and lots of prizes to be won. I think a quiz buff
like you should register here too and get started on answering.
Maybe we'
Cyril Brulebois writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow (11/11/2009):
>> Homework: Find out how
>>
>> I uploaded a 147-2 package which reverts the O_CLOEXEC change and
>> allows 2.6.26, let's see if it works.
>>
>> translates to
>>
>> I stop using inotify_init1().
>
> Easy:
> | --- a/udev/ude
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> First, network protocols that "do not allow to display" anything are
> abundant, since no network protocol "displays" anything -- clients that
> use the protocol do. This is true for HTTP, FTP, SMTP, and whatnot.
If you connect to my SMTP server you w
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Package name: pleiades
Version: 1.3.1
Upstream Author: Shinji Kashihara (柏原 真二)
URL: http://sourceforge.jp/projects/mergedoc/
License: Eclipse
Playing-with-the-subject-season? Alright.
Charles Plessy (12/11/2009):
> I do not think that such a list would contain more than 10 names
> after removing the MIA DDs. Most of the aggressivity on Debian
> Planet, and most of the examples I received in private in the past
> point at the same perso
Le Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 06:16:03PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
>
> Packages that are uploaded nowadays and that fail to build
> *everywhere* because of missing *trivial* Build-Depends (think
> autofoo, pkg-config, libstuff-dev when the package is stuff-related,
> etc.) would rather make me th
Le Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 03:20:38PM +0100, Luk Claes a écrit :
>
> I think it's very wrong to ask core teams to lower the standards of
> possible package uploads while noone invests time to create a building
> machine that would make source-only uploads possible, even with the
> current rules in pl
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:45:04PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:43:19AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> > John Goerzen wrote:
> > > My suggestion is this:
> > >
> > > Take the default Firefox user agent.
> > >
> > > Where you see Firefox/x.y.z, change it to:
> > >
> > >
Oh no, please, Please, PLEASE, *PLEASE* do not cross-post the discussions
between debian-vote and debian-devel. There is no point having separated lists
otherwise.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:11:40PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 08:52:23PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > 2.1 This clause restricts how you can modify the software.
> > Doing a simple modification to a AGPL-covered software might require
> > you to
> > write
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> -- The code is modified to interact with the user using a network protocol
>> that does not allow to display a prominent offer.
>
> This is actually your best argument so far, but I don't think it's
> completely true either.
Yes
Helloo,
Daniel Leidert, le Wed 11 Nov 2009 17:36:05 +0100, a écrit :
> A question: I'm currently working with relaxNG and found, that we
> (Debian) AFAIK don't have the schemes for RNG [1] or XSD [2] packaged.
I don't know very much about relaxNG, but I guess you could be
interested in the isorel
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 08:52:23PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Dear developers,
>
> I respectfully submit this general resolution proposal to your consideration.
> (this GR proposal supersedes the proposal in
> <20090318235044.ga30...@yellowpig>)
>
> Asking for seconds,
> (please CC me)
> Bil
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 09:41:31PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> >-- The code is modified to interact with the user using a network
> > protocol
> > that does not allow to display a prominent offer.
>
> Any example of this?
One could add an IMAP interface to a blog management system, allow
Bill Allombert wrote:
> 13. Remote Network Interaction; Use with the GNU General Public License.
>
> Notwithstanding any other provision of this License, if you modify the
> Program, your modified version must prominently offer all users interacting
> with it remotely through a computer
Dear developers,
I respectfully submit this general resolution proposal to your consideration.
(this GR proposal supersedes the proposal in <20090318235044.ga30...@yellowpig>)
Asking for seconds,
(please CC me)
Bill.
This General Resolution is made in accordance with Debian Constitution 4.1.5,
Hi,
I would like to use a perl lib included in postgresql-common from a
postinst script. What have I to do ? Call directly from the postinst or
write a perl script called from postinst ?
Regards,
--
Rodolphe Quiédeville - Artisan Logiciel Libre
http://rodolphe.quiedeville.org/
Travaillons Libre
Goswin von Brederlow (11/11/2009):
> Homework: Find out how
>
> I uploaded a 147-2 package which reverts the O_CLOEXEC change and
> allows 2.6.26, let's see if it works.
>
> translates to
>
> I stop using inotify_init1().
Easy:
| --- a/udev/udev-watch.c
| +++ b/udev/udev-watch.c
| @@
Charles Plessy (11/11/2009):
> my gut feeling (but maybe I start to sound like a broken disk) is
> that most “FTBFS” and RC bugs that stay unfixed are more the
> signature of abandonned packages than sloppy maintainers.
Abandoned packages may start to FTBFS due to changes in their
build-dependenc
Am Mittwoch, den 11.11.2009, 17:36 +0100 schrieb Daniel Leidert:
> Hi,
>
> A question: I'm currently working with relaxNG and found, that we
> (Debian) AFAIK don't have the schemes for RNG [1] or XSD [2] packaged.
Well we the files (a few od them) shipped as package data or
documentation:
relaxn
Julien Cristau writes:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 16:45:58 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
>> According to "man 2 open":
>>
>>O_CLOEXEC (Since Linux 2.6.23)
>>
>> So why does using this flag require 2.6.27? Who is wrong here?
>>
> If you'd actually bothered to look at the changes i
Hi,
A question: I'm currently working with relaxNG and found, that we
(Debian) AFAIK don't have the schemes for RNG [1] or XSD [2] packaged.
To validate RNG or XSD schemas, they are necessary. So my question what
you would prefer:
1) separate packages for every schema (e.g. relaxng-core,
xml-sch
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> I can't think of a better way to stop this ridiculous UA mess. It has to
> stop, this silliness has lasted too many years already.
A better way would bring on the User-Agent flag day, where all the
browser vendors turn off submitting us
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 04:51:49PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Nov 11, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> >O_CLOEXEC (Since Linux 2.6.23)
> > So why does using this flag require 2.6.27? Who is wrong here?
> I understand that it is needed for inotify_init1(2).
That makes more send. The s
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 16:45:58 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> According to "man 2 open":
>
>O_CLOEXEC (Since Linux 2.6.23)
>
> So why does using this flag require 2.6.27? Who is wrong here?
>
If you'd actually bothered to look at the changes in question, you would
have noticed t
On Nov 11, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>O_CLOEXEC (Since Linux 2.6.23)
>
> So why does using this flag require 2.6.27? Who is wrong here?
I understand that it is needed for inotify_init1(2).
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On Nov 10, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>
>> Due to changes in udev 147, squeeze will not support kernels earlier
>> than 2.6.27.
> I uploaded a 147-2 package which reverts the O_CLOEXEC change and allows
> 2.6.26, let's see if it works.
>
> --
> ciao,
> Marco
Acco
Adam Majer wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 09:57:22AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> I just decided I don't care anymore. So here is a deal to those reading
>> this thread. Give me a UA string that:
>> - Doesn't claim to be Firefox (i.e keep Iceweasel in it)
>> - Is compatible with most crappy site
Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:05:47PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:45:04PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:43:19AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
John Goerzen wrote:
> Firefox/x.y.z Iceweasel/x.y.z
>>> Sounds too Firefox
On Nov 10, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Due to changes in udev 147, squeeze will not support kernels earlier
> than 2.6.27.
I uploaded a 147-2 package which reverts the O_CLOEXEC change and allows
2.6.26, let's see if it works.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:45:57AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
>> Personally, I think that the extreme trade-off of making source upload
>> the default (which seems to be what you are arguing for) would be too
>> risky in term of degraded package quality. Look for th
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: LI Daobing
* Package name: tegaki-wagomu
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : The Tegaki project contributors
* URL : http://www.tegaki.org/
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: C++, Python
Description : another recogn
Adam Majer wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 09:57:22AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> I just decided I don't care anymore. So here is a deal to those reading
>> this thread. Give me a UA string that:
>> - Doesn't claim to be Firefox (i.e keep Iceweasel in it)
>> - Is compatible with most crappy sites
Zitat von Julien Cristau :
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 02:14:00 -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 07:56:16AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 06:08:08PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > Due to changes in udev 147, squeeze will not support kernels earlier
> > than
Le Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:45:57AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
>
> Personally, I think that the extreme trade-off of making source upload
> the default (which seems to be what you are arguing for) would be too
> risky in term of degraded package quality. Look for the "FTBFS" string
> in th
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: wnpp
Version: 0.6.4
Upstream Author: Marcel Hellkamp
URL: http://bottle.paws.de/
License: MIT
Description: fast and simple WSGI-framework for Python
Bottle is a fast and
On 2009-11-11 09:42:25 +0100, Michal Čihař wrote:
> Sandro Tosi napsal(a):
> > As a personal note, as one of those unlucky people with a very slow
> > network connection: if binary packages built by maintainer have to be
> > discarded, than *please* allow a way to actually not upload them.
> >
>
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 02:14:00 -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 07:56:16AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 06:08:08PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > Due to changes in udev 147, squeeze will not support kernels earlier
> > > than 2.6.27.
> >
> > What a
[Adam Majer]
> Opera does allows per-site configuration of the UA string. Opera lies
> a lot in name of compatibility.
I believe a complete list of the workarounds in Opera is available
from http://www.opera.com/docs/browserjs/>. The version of
browser.js used by my Opera is downloaded from
http
On 2009-11-11, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Personally, I think that the extreme trade-off of making source upload
> the default (which seems to be what you are arguing for) would be too
> risky in term of degraded package quality. Look for the "FTBFS" string
> in the current RC bug list, do you th
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:02:39AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:33:42PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Mike Hommey (10/11/2009):
> > > Let me suggest adding "(like Firefox/3.5)", but I'm not sure how the
> > > crappy sites parsing the version number will deal with the
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:17:05PM -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
> It is *one* way of making sure the archive is consistent. But the idea
> behind source-only is to remove the necessity of uploading giant
> binaries if they are to be tossed anyway. For example, OpenOffice
> revisions, or Linux kernel re
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:20:49PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:05:47PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:45:04PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:43:19AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> > > > John Goerzen wrote:
> > > > >
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> I actually never experienced problems that were not due to my DSL
> connection, which means they can happen at any time. In which case I'd
> dcut the last file and continue the upload. But when that happens in the
> middle of a file that takes
retitle 549710 release-notes: [SQUEEZE] udev drops support for kernels < 2.6.22
(or <2.6.27)
thanks
The requirement might be raised to 2.6.27
(which is higher that the one in Lenny).
See udev maintainer announcement and thread[1]:
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 18:08 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote in:
> Due
The current Iceweasel UA string is "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686;
en-US; rv:1.9.1.4) Gecko/20091028 Iceweasel/3.5.4 (Debian-3.5.4-1)".
How about modifying the last (distro-specific) part to read "(like
Firefox/3.5.4 Debian-3.5.4-1)"?
The browser's similarity to Firefox would be listed amon
On 2009-11-11, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> Yes, you're missing at least the lintian checks that happen on ftp-master.
> You mean, the ones that should be running on buildd generated packages
> anyway ?
Sadly there is no easy way to let buildd cope with packages vanishing on
ftp-master and not being acc
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 09:54:38AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 09:42, Michal Čihař wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Dne Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:39:38 +0100
> >> Sandro Tosi napsal(a):
> >>
> >>> As a personal note, as one of those unlucky people with a very slow
>
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 09:52:12AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> You don't have to start over if the upload did not fail in the middle of
> a file, but failed right after a file. It may seem unlikely, but I've
> had these failures way more often than failures in the middle of a file.
>
> So if it did
Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 09:42, Michal Čihař wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Dne Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:39:38 +0100
>> Sandro Tosi napsal(a):
>>
>>> As a personal note, as one of those unlucky people with a very slow
>>> network connection: if binary packages built by maintainer have to be
>>
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 09:48:13AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Michal Čihař wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Dne Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:39:38 +0100
> > Sandro Tosi napsal(a):
> >
> >> As a personal note, as one of those unlucky people with a very slow
> >> network connection: if binary packages built by maintai
Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 09:39:38AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 08:30, Adam Majer wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 02:58:19PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26 2009, Adam Majer wrote:
> Or here's a radical idea - allow source only
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 09:42, Michal Čihař wrote:
> Hi
>
> Dne Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:39:38 +0100
> Sandro Tosi napsal(a):
>
>> As a personal note, as one of those unlucky people with a very slow
>> network connection: if binary packages built by maintainer have to be
>> discarded, than *please* al
Michal Čihař wrote:
> Hi
>
> Dne Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:39:38 +0100
> Sandro Tosi napsal(a):
>
>> As a personal note, as one of those unlucky people with a very slow
>> network connection: if binary packages built by maintainer have to be
>> discarded, than *please* allow a way to actually not uplo
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 09:39:38AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 08:30, Adam Majer wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 02:58:19PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 26 2009, Adam Majer wrote:
> >> > Or here's a radical idea - allow source only uploads of packages.
Hi
Dne Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:39:38 +0100
Sandro Tosi napsal(a):
> As a personal note, as one of those unlucky people with a very slow
> network connection: if binary packages built by maintainer have to be
> discarded, than *please* allow a way to actually not upload them.
>
> I'm in favor of let
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 08:30, Adam Majer wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 02:58:19PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 26 2009, Adam Majer wrote:
>> > Or here's a radical idea - allow source only uploads of packages.
>>
>> And thus allow people to upload without ever building
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 07:56:16AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 06:08:08PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > Due to changes in udev 147, squeeze will not support kernels earlier
> > than 2.6.27.
>
> What are these changes?
Seems it is related to signalfd4 syscall.
- Adam
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 09:57:22AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> I just decided I don't care anymore. So here is a deal to those reading
> this thread. Give me a UA string that:
> - Doesn't claim to be Firefox (i.e keep Iceweasel in it)
> - Is compatible with most crappy sites on earth[1] (i.e. Test
61 matches
Mail list logo
