Goswin von Brederlow <[email protected]> (11/11/2009): > Homework: Find out how > > I uploaded a 147-2 package which reverts the O_CLOEXEC change and > allows 2.6.26, let's see if it works. > > translates to > > I stop using inotify_init1().
Easy:
| --- a/udev/udev-watch.c
| +++ b/udev/udev-watch.c
| @@ -38,8 +38,10 @@ static int inotify_fd = -1;
| */
| int udev_watch_init(struct udev *udev)
| {
| - inotify_fd = inotify_init1(IN_CLOEXEC);
| - if (inotify_fd < 0)
| + inotify_fd = inotify_init();
| + if (inotify_fd >= 0)
| + util_set_fd_cloexec(inotify_fd);
| + else
| err(udev, "inotify_init failed: %m\n");
| return inotify_fd;
| }
It *might* be that *CLOEXEC are concerned.
Next time, try to RTFD? Oh wait, that was Julien's point already.
> Thank you for presenting information in the most agressive way.
While still being kind of… dead right.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
