Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: fenics
Version: 8.10
Upstream author: FEniCS developers
URL: http://www.fenics.org
License: none (meta package)
Description: automation of computational mathematical modeling
The vision of FEniCS is to set
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: viper
Version: 0.3.0
Upstream author: Ola Skavhaug
URL: http://www.fenics.org/wiki/Viper
License: LGPL
Description: minimalistic scientific plotter and run-time visualization
module
Viper is a minimalistic
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 435 (new: 1)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 124 (new: 0)
Total number of packages request
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 09:44:33AM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Every kernel upload changing the ABI goes through NEW.
> The typical situation here is that code that has the same set of DFSG
> bugs is already in place and so it is questionable of what a reject
> reall
Dear:Debian-devel
If you're wondering why you're online business is not doing as well as you
would like - the answer is
web traffic. Basically - you need a lot more visibility. Email us today at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] We will
take a look at your site and give you an assessment free of charge. I
Dear:Debian-devel
We can see you have a good site but you could use a significant increase in
targeted web traffic. We
can review your site for free and show you how you can improve this portion of
your online business
right away. Email us now at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include your web site
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 15:51 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 04:50:23PM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
> > In the kernel itself, yes. Provided that:
> >
> > * the kernel framework for loading firmware is used for drivers
> > depending on non-free firmware, and
> > * that
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 22:08 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>
> The FSF seems to disagree on this[1]:
>
> Can I release a non-free program that's designed to load a GPL-covered
> plug-in?
>
> It depends on how the program invokes its plug-ins. For instance, if
> the program uses o
* Francis Tyers [Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:47:20 +0200]:
> Hi,
Hello, Francis.
> The bug is that the language packages require a specific version of
> libpcre to function.
Could you explain a bit the technical background for this? Do the data
files in the language packages embed any data that is pcre
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: gregor herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: bti
Version : 006
Upstream Author : Greg Kroah-Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/g
Hi,
I'd like to open an RC bug for the following packages, following [1] I
am asking the list.
apertium-en-ca
apertium-en-es
apertium-eo-ca
apertium-eo-es
apertium-es-ca
apertium-es-gl
apertium-es-pt
apertium-es-ro
apertium-fr-ca
apertium-fr-es
apertium-oc-ca
apertium-pt-gl
apertium-oc-es
There
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 21:13 +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> > Firmware and driver do not run on the same CPU. There is no 'linkage'
> > between them. With a client/server application, a GPL client does not
> > enforce the server to be GPL, even if client and server are
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 04:50:23PM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
> In the kernel itself, yes. Provided that:
>
> * the kernel framework for loading firmware is used for drivers
> depending on non-free firmware, and
> * that firmware is available in non-free via firmware-nonfree
What if the fi
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 21:13 +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 11:38 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> >> The iwl4965 firmware changed 2 times incompatible since the driver
> >> exists.
> >
> > That makes me wonder just how separate the driver and firmware a
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 22/10/08 at 20:38 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>>
>> If everything goes the way I want it to be, it won't be just lucas the one
>> filing reports: I asked lucas if he could do the remove/purge test in lenny
>
> I'll do that.
Thanks :)
>
>> and
>> the full install/
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 11:38 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>> The iwl4965 firmware changed 2 times incompatible since the driver
>> exists.
>
> That makes me wonder just how separate the driver and firmware are. If
> they are tightly coupled then the firmware may become subjec
Manoj Srivastava wrote the following on 23.10.2008 19:06
<- *snip* ->
> Look, I am not proposing we have a GR for every upload. I am
> saying that non-free bits in main are a bug. A serious bug. A RC
> bug. It is a big fucking deal. It comes to the core of what Debian is.
>
>
Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In other words, if a tag indicates a special case, that special case
> > should be justified with a specific explanation.
> >
> > I would like to see such justification expected for every such tag,
> > enforced by the convention that tags with *no
- "Manoj Srivastava" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23 2008, martin f krafft wrote:
>
> > It's all a matter of defining what your priorities are, which brings
> > us back to the Social Contract, which says that these include:
> >
> > - 100% freeness
> > - cater best to the inter
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 18:13 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> Perhaps I'm mis-reading the above. Which bit of the foundation documents
> do you think would need overriding for the tech-ctte to rule on which
> fix to take?
One might think that this is the situation: two alternative fixes for
the DFSG p
On Thu, Oct 23 2008, martin f krafft wrote:
> It's all a matter of defining what your priorities are, which brings
> us back to the Social Contract, which says that these include:
>
> - 100% freeness
> - cater best to the interests of our users
Frankly, this mindset infuriates me. It
On Wed, Oct 22 2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> At some point, someone has to decide. Doing a vote for each is
> impractical. As our choice is _not_ silent, if someones (like usually
> the reporter who _sees_ such tags happen) disagree, he can raise a
> discussion. AFAICT it's what is happening cur
Luca Capello wrote the following on 23.10.2008 10:53
<- *snip* ->
>> That should be good enough to install, and then add non-free to
>> sources.list and get the firmware required for the driver to work
>> (absent a non-free debian installer that bundles non-free bits). This
>> is no di
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 07:06:14PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 05:41:05PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 03:51:22PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:23:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 21 October 2008, you
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 05:41:05PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 03:51:22PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:23:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 21 October 2008, you wrote:
> > > > But, in fact, fixes are not welcome from the team. The
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 03:51:22PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:23:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 October 2008, you wrote:
> > > But, in fact, fixes are not welcome from the team. They have raised a
> > > major roadblock, allowing only one kind of fix wh
Hi Luca, thanks for the comment.
On October 22, 2008 at 7:18PM +0200,
luca (at pca.it) wrote:
> > * Package name: alpaca
> [...]
> > * URL : http://www.mew.org/~kazu/proj/cipher/
>
> I think that a package for one single file is too much.
Even so, the Debian package is helpful fo
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 08:36:24AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> Every kernel upload changing the ABI goes through NEW.
>
> Your lack of knowledge of Debian processes sucks (that means: you
> annoy us (at least me) with your stance and the fanatic way you defend it
> in public, please stop th
* Lucas Nussbaum [Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:40:03 +0200]:
> The release team isn't proactively tracking those AFAIK
Except that we... are.
Thank you very much.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at de
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:23:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 October 2008, you wrote:
> > But, in fact, fixes are not welcome from the team. They have raised a
> > major roadblock, allowing only one kind of fix which requires a lot of
> > work, and rejecting anything simpler.
>
> Ev
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008, Paul Wise wrote:
> You must have misread the part of the email where it was mentioned
> that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is itself MIA and doesn't reply.
MIA currently does reply but does not necessarily follows up with action
(more than adding hints in the MIA database).
However, I c
Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In other words, if a tag indicates a special case, that special case
> > should be justified with a specific explanation.
> >
> > I would like to see such justification expected for every such tag,
> > enforced by the convention that tags with *no*
On Thu Oct 23 12:53, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:40, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No: in some cases, the maintainer forgot to send an unblock request to
> > -release@, or the fix was inappropriate, and the bug will have to be
> > fixed through a testing-proposed
On 23/10/08 at 13:05 +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 09:26:43AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here is a list of RC bugs in lenny, sorted by maintainer. If you want to
> > reply to the list to comment on specific bugs, it's fine, but please Cc
> > the bug reports
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 11:38 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:54:41AM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 22.10.2008, 08:36 +0200 schrieb Bastian Blank:
> > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 08:07:52AM +0200, Michal Čihař wrote:
> > > > At least ipw2100 drivers changed fi
> > Wouldn't it make sense to only send [TU] bugs as these are the bugs we have
> > to
> > fix for the release? [T] normaly means fix just waiting for migration, isn't
> > it?
>
> No: in some cases, the maintainer forgot to send an unblock request to
> -release@, or the fix was inappropriate, and
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 09:26:43AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a list of RC bugs in lenny, sorted by maintainer. If you want to
> reply to the list to comment on specific bugs, it's fine, but please Cc
> the bug reports so the information you provide is also available on the
> B
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:40, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No: in some cases, the maintainer forgot to send an unblock request to
> -release@, or the fix was inappropriate, and the bug will have to be
> fixed through a testing-proposed-updates upload.
>
> The release team isn't proa
On 23/10/08 at 10:21 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 09:26:43AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > The list can also be found on
> > http://udd.debian.net/cgi-bin/lenny_rc_ddlist.cgi (generated on the fly
> > from UDD).
> >
> > [T] means "affects only testing", [TU] means "aff
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mikhail Gusarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: chname
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Michael Marineau
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/chname/
* License : GNU General Public License v2
Programming Lang: C
Descrip
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Dmitry E. Oboukhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for orphan this package :)
You must have misread the part of the email where it was mentioned
that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is itself MIA and doesn't reply.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.
On 09:42 Thu 23 Oct , W. van den Akker wrote:
WvdA> Hi,
WvdA> I am trying to get in contact with the DD who maintains the Scid package.
WvdA> From end of may until now he is non-responsive.
WvdA> I want to take over the maintainership of Scid and some other packages
because
WvdA> there are ne
Hi there!
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:28:08 +0200, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21 2008, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>> acceleration, right? So the box can be installed, and is usable for
>>> non-gaming purposes. The drm stuff can pos
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:53:46PM +, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Mi, 22 Okt 2008, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > In the end, all these discussions showed that many people here don't
> > > give a piss for the users.
> >
> > Many? I only see 2 or 3 of them around.
>
> Ok, many *loud* voices ..
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 09:26:43AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> The list can also be found on
> http://udd.debian.net/cgi-bin/lenny_rc_ddlist.cgi (generated on the fly
> from UDD).
>
> [T] means "affects only testing", [TU] means "affects testing and
> unstable".
Wouldn't it make sense to only
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 3:42 PM, W. van den Akker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can somebody of you DD check if the maintainer of Scid has been active or is
> inactive.
Last activity according to mia-query was October 2006.
> Besides that I have a non-responsive mia (at) qa.debian.org. Posted 3 m
Hi,
I am trying to get in contact with the DD who maintains the Scid package.
From end of may until now he is non-responsive.
I want to take over the maintainership of Scid and some other packages because
there are new upstream versions available.
Can somebody of you DD check if the maintainer of
Hi,
I am trying to get in contact with the DD who maintains the Scid package.
From end of may until now he is non-responsive.
I want to take over the maintainership of Scid and some other packages
because there are new upstream versions available.
Can somebody of you DD check if the maintainer of
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Every kernel upload changing the ABI goes through NEW.
The typical situation here is that code that has the same set of DFSG
bugs is already in place and so it is questionable of what a reject
really achieves (i.e. does the archive become more DFSG-compliant or
not) and qu
Hi,
Here is a list of RC bugs in lenny, sorted by maintainer. If you want to
reply to the list to comment on specific bugs, it's fine, but please Cc
the bug reports so the information you provide is also available on the
BTS.
The list can also be found on
http://udd.debian.net/cgi-bin/lenny_rc_dd
On 22/10/08 at 20:38 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>
> > On mar, oct 21, 2008 at 11:57:48 +, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> >> Le mardi 21 octobre 2008 à 08:53 -0300, David Bremner a écrit :
> >> > So downgrading bugs to non-RC severity (with appropriate rationale)
> >> >
51 matches
Mail list logo
