On 23/10/08 at 10:21 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 09:26:43AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > The list can also be found on > > http://udd.debian.net/cgi-bin/lenny_rc_ddlist.cgi (generated on the fly > > from UDD). > > > > [T] means "affects only testing", [TU] means "affects testing and > > unstable". > > Wouldn't it make sense to only send [TU] bugs as these are the bugs we have to > fix for the release? [T] normaly means fix just waiting for migration, isn't > it?
No: in some cases, the maintainer forgot to send an unblock request to -release@, or the fix was inappropriate, and the bug will have to be fixed through a testing-proposed-updates upload. The release team isn't proactively tracking those AFAIK, it's still the maintainer's responsibility to take care of this. > > Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > [TU] watchdog #503080 watchdog.postinst: line 18: /sbin/MAKEDEV: No s > > [T] (U) acpid #487815 acpid: dies on any given Sunday > > [T] (U) acpid #491058 acpid exits > > [T] (U) acpid #495686 acpid not starting after (re)boot > > Using my bugs as an example. All four of them are fixed in unstable, so > neither > needs work. Watchdog was reported and uploaded yesterday, so no surprise it's > still listed as [TU]. ... and watchdog also needs an unblock. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
