* Neil Williams
(Please respect my Mail-Followup-To and my Mail-Copies-To: never)
| On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 08:33 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
|
| > How would you then handle libraries that go in /lib? (Apart from the
| > fact that I think just using a subdirectory of /usr/lib is much neater
| >
On Sun, 6 Jul 2008 13:41:30 -0400
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> > fd.o menus are designed to allow distro-specific policy. It's the
> > matter of Debian KDE/Gnome packaging/menu policy to get the proper
> > subset of the packages in menu (e.g. moving Gnome/gtk app
* Bernd Eckenfels
| In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
| > Why are all of you talking as though sending SIGTERM were not the
| > standard way to tell a process to save its state and exit gracefully?
|
| Thats not the point. It is a quesion of sequence. When you get the killall5
| sigterm,
Twas brillig at 18:52:35 06.07.2008 UTC-04 when [EMAIL PROTECTED] did gyre and
gimble:
>> fd.o menus are designed to allow distro-specific policy. It's the
>> matter of Debian KDE/Gnome packaging/menu policy to get the proper
>> subset of the packages in menu (e.g. moving Gnome/gtk application
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 05:14:44PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:39:37AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> > You don't seem to request ipv4 addresses, you request AF_UNSPEC, which
> > should get you both ipv4 and ipv6. You get 127.0.0.1 twice, and ::1 one
> > time.
>
> Yo
Steve Langasek a écrit :
> Hi folks,
>
> I've run across an ipv4/ipv6 configuration issue which I think needs to have
> light cast on it so we can try to resolve this in time for lenny (whatever
> the right resolution actually is), in order to avoid a pile-up of
> /etc/hosts-related kludges as has
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 1:41 AM, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (Just for example, I recently orphaned xgalaga, so its new maintainers
> decided to do something about #432398, which I had been sitting on for
> some time as this issue was not resolved. Now I check my gnome machine
> and it h
On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 17:14 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> As for DNS, at least in the case of bind I find that duplicate records
> are
> weeded out by the server. If you can suggest a DNS server that would
> not
> condense the duplicate records, I'd be happy to test to see what the
> behavior
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 08:03:13PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jun 29, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Note that duplicate IPs can be very harmful and even cause loss of data.
> > For
> Come on, how often this happens? And it's disabled by default anyway.
> The major effect of
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 08:17:21PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080705 18:22]:
> > * I like to have an exact copy of the downloaded source tarball with
> >the same md5 checksum, gpg detached signature, etc. Using the
> >rules/tarball.mk from cdbs
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:39:37AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> You don't seem to request ipv4 addresses, you request AF_UNSPEC, which
> should get you both ipv4 and ipv6. You get 127.0.0.1 twice, and ::1 one
> time.
You'll find that the duplication of 127.0.0.1 is still there if you specify
AF_I
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 03:09:09PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've run across an ipv4/ipv6 configuration issue which I think needs to have
> light cast on it so we can try to resolve this in time for lenny (whatever
> the right resolution actually is), in order to avoid a pile-up
On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 00:13:30 +0700
Mikhail Gusarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Twas brillig at 13:08:40 06.07.2008 UTC-04 when [EMAIL PROTECTED] did
> gyre and gimble:
>
> JH> So, after sufficient time, the gnome menu will contain a random
> JH> assortment of the menu items that also appear in
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Source package: python-scriptutil
Binary package(s): python-scriptutil
Version: 1
Licence: BSD
Author: Muharem Hrnjadovic
Hi folks,
I've run across an ipv4/ipv6 configuration issue which I think needs to have
light cast on it so we can try to resolve this in time for lenny (whatever
the right resolution actually is), in order to avoid a pile-up of
/etc/hosts-related kludges as has been known to happen before...
In r
On 2008-07-06, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > of Debian KDE/Gnome packaging/menu policy to get the proper subset of
>> > the packages in menu (e.g. moving Gnome/gtk applications deeper in KDE
>> > menu and Qt/KDE - in Gnome one).
>>
>> The users should have equal access to good progra
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2008-07-06, Mikhail Gusarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > fd.o menus are designed to allow distro-specific policy. It's the matter
> > of Debian KDE/Gnome packaging/menu policy to get the proper subset of
> > the packages in menu (e.g. moving Gnome/gt
Andrea Ferraresi wrote:
> Hello folks,
> i have some trouble about a strange file problem experienced after
> a filesystem [ReiserFS] crash.
> In the /var/run directory I have 3 files (sshd.pid, sudo, motd) that cannot
> be accessed in any way. I try to remove it but rm -f returns a
> "permission d
On Jun 29, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Note that duplicate IPs can be very harmful and even cause loss of data. For
Come on, how often this happens? And it's disabled by default anyway.
The major effect of this patch is to waste time on almost every system
every time *any* interfac
On 2008-07-06, Mikhail Gusarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> fd.o menus are designed to allow distro-specific policy. It's the matter
> of Debian KDE/Gnome packaging/menu policy to get the proper subset of
> the packages in menu (e.g. moving Gnome/gtk applications deeper in KDE
> menu and Qt/KDE - i
Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> fd.o menus are designed to allow distro-specific policy. It's the matter
> of Debian KDE/Gnome packaging/menu policy to get the proper subset of
> the packages in menu (e.g. moving Gnome/gtk applications deeper in KDE
> menu and Qt/KDE - in Gnome one).
That might work for
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 01:08:40PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Therefore, I still feel that, despite it being a big mess, the current
> > situation is the best:
> > * the default menu contains only what is needed, and we are still
> > hunting down entries tha
Twas brillig at 13:08:40 06.07.2008 UTC-04 when [EMAIL PROTECTED] did gyre and
gimble:
JH> So, after sufficient time, the gnome menu will contain a random
JH> assortment of the menu items that also appear in the debian menu.
fd.o menus are designed to allow distro-specific policy. It's the mat
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Therefore, I still feel that, despite it being a big mess, the current
> situation is the best:
> * the default menu contains only what is needed, and we are still
> hunting down entries that are useless to make them not show up
> by default;
>
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> working on dpkg reminded me that I wanted to propose a better
> diversion and alternatives handling for debian packages. Currently
> they have to be manually added and removed in the maintainer
> scripts. This method is prone to errors and can easily leave
> diversions
Thanks for all the input on tarball within tarball. I will stop using
that format for all my packages with the possible exception of ICU
which contains its own debian directory.
I was aware of the fact that dpkg-source handles the tarball nnot
extracting to package-version and have, in fact, adv
On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 14:28:15 +0200, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Therefore, I still feel that, despite it being a big mess, the current
situation is the best:
* the default menu contains only what is needed, and we are still
hunting down entries that are useless to
2008/7/6 Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> No those are functions... the main code runs without "set -e" and thus doesn't
> fail on the error and the return value of the function is checked:
>
>do_start
>case "$?" in
>0|1) [ "$VERBOSE" != no ] && log_end_msg 0
Le samedi 05 juillet 2008 à 02:42 -0400, Daniel Dickinson a écrit :
> Gnome, KDE, and XFCE are the the top three desktops used in debian and
> cover most users of desktops in debian.
>
> They all use xdg .desktop-based menus as their main menu.
The last time this discussion was raised up, the cle
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: icu4j
Version : 3.8.1
Upstream Author : IBM Corp. and ICU Team
* URL : http://icu-project.org/
* License : ICU License
Programming Lang: Java
Description : unicode
On Sun, 06 Jul 2008, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> > Note that /etc/init.d/skeleton, on which many init scripts in Debian are
> > based, handles this case correctly without using --oknodo.
>
> Are you sure? These are the "start" and "stop" sections of skeleton
> file in a Debian Etch:
No those are
> Note that /etc/init.d/skeleton, on which many init scripts in Debian are
> based, handles this case correctly without using --oknodo.
Are you sure? These are the "start" and "stop" sections of skeleton
file in a Debian Etch:
-
do_start()
{
# Return
# 0 if daemon ha
* Andrea Ferraresi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello folks,
> i have some trouble about a strange file problem experienced after
> a filesystem [ReiserFS] crash.
> In the /var/run directory I have 3 files (sshd.pid, sudo, motd) that cannot
> be accessed in any way. I try to remove it but rm -f returns a
Hello folks,
i have some trouble about a strange file problem experienced after
a filesystem [ReiserFS] crash.
In the /var/run directory I have 3 files (sshd.pid, sudo, motd) that cannot
be accessed in any way. I try to remove it but rm -f returns a
"permission denied" message
sshd doesn't work but
On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 12:13:27 +0200, Raphael Hertzog
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sat, 05 Jul 2008, Marc Haber wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 10:58:35AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> > THanks, I could come up with a transition plan myself if needed. But
>> > compare your suggestions with: "so
(some of the answers/facts have already been given, but I reply anyway to
also give my personal opinion)
On Sat, 05 Jul 2008, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> * I like to have an exact copy of the downloaded source tarball with
>the same md5 checksum, gpg detached signature, etc. Using the
That shou
36 matches
Mail list logo
