On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 12:13:27 +0200, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Sat, 05 Jul 2008, Marc Haber wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 10:58:35AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: >> > THanks, I could come up with a transition plan myself if needed. But >> > compare your suggestions with: "someone goes over all init scripts, file >> > bugs and in lenny+1 we're done". >> >> That'll cause tremendous pain for backporters. I'm opposed. > >You're opposed to what?
Reversing s-s-d's behavior from lenny to lenny+1. >I think you misunderstood. I don't want to change the default behaviour >of start-stop-daemon and as such, there's no need for any transition. I see... Greetings Marc -- -------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! ----- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/ Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
