Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sunday 23 December 2007, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> The new scheme is:
>> http://lintian.debian.org/reports/maintainer/.html
>
> The links from those pages to error descriptions are broken:
>
> http://lintian.debian.org/reports/maintainer/Tnewer-debconf-t
On Sunday 23 December 2007, Russ Allbery wrote:
> The new scheme is:
> http://lintian.debian.org/reports/maintainer/.html
The links from those pages to error descriptions are broken:
http://lintian.debian.org/reports/maintainer/Tnewer-debconf-templates.html
404 Not Found
There's no record of
[Russ Allbery]
> See previous thread about old Unix users and what we expect. :)
Well, some old unix users might expect it, but I've been using Unix
and friends since I started with HP-UX 9 in 1992, and I do not expect
word lists to be installed by default. :)
Lets move to the most advanced spe
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 08:12:52PM +0100, Steffen Joeris wrote:
> My debian time is already taken by other debian things, so I am not
> finding enough time to maintain this package properly.
> If you are willing to take it over, be my guest. However, I guess it is
> a good idea to also adopt the do
On 22-Dec-07, 11:48 (CST), Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is what I feel about it: ITP should be filled the moment you'd
> like to package a piece of software, so you're not supposed to know it
> in deep; thus, the long description (that describes what the package
> does) can be rew
let's continue this on d-{devel,python}
On Dec 22, 2007 8:50 PM, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Julien Cristau [Sat, 22 Dec 2007 18:41:37 +0100]:
>
> > Why not use the same name for both? I think it'd be clearer, and
> > has no drawbacks afaics.
>
> +1. I personally dislike so many
Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [Brian M. Carlson]
>> Note that the w* packages provide word lists, which are important to
>> many programs. One could argue that a standard Unix system should
>> have a word list; at least, every Unix system I have used provides
>> one.
> OK. W
On Dec 21, "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How widespread is this anyway? I hardly see any new qmail installations
> anymore, and the ones I see are largely because it's a pain to migrate away
> from.
Just one word: plesk.
And yes, I'd like myself as well to see qmail die the
* Julien Cristau [Sat, 22 Dec 2007 18:41:37 +0100]:
> Why not use the same name for both? I think it'd be clearer, and
> has no drawbacks afaics.
+1. I personally dislike so many python modules "suffering" from this.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com
On la, 2007-12-22 at 20:06 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Brian M. Carlson]
> > Note that the w* packages provide word lists, which are important to
> > many programs. One could argue that a standard Unix system should
> > have a word list; at least, every Unix system I have used provides
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi
My debian time is already taken by other debian things, so I am not
finding enough time to maintain this package properly.
If you are willing to take it over, be my guest. However, I guess it is
a good idea to also adopt the documentation package (gpsim-doc), the
[Brian M. Carlson]
> Note that the w* packages provide word lists, which are important to
> many programs. One could argue that a standard Unix system should
> have a word list; at least, every Unix system I have used provides
> one.
OK. Which programs? I was only aware of ispell.
Happy hacki
On Saturday December 22 2007 12:16:20 Hagen Paul Pfeifer wrote:
> * Ron Johnson | 2007-12-21 21:30:08 [-0600]:
> >From reading the web page, it seems that netsend might only
> > work between Linux systems. Am I reading it wrong?
>
> You are right. Netsend is optimized for linux: splice(),
> madvic
* Ron Johnson | 2007-12-21 21:30:08 [-0600]:
>From reading the web page, it seems that netsend might only work
>between Linux systems. Am I reading it wrong?
You are right. Netsend is optimized for linux: splice(), madvice(), congestion
control algorithms (bic, cubic, ...), etc. There is curren
When measuring the amount of packages in Debian/sid with dependency
information for their init.d scripts today, I was very happy to
discover that more than 2/3 of the packages in Sid now have dependency
information included. Only one base package is missing it
(libdevmapper1.02.1), and only three
Improve sexual endurance.
http://pikkividdy.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
> If I understand correctly, I should be working with Daniel Baumann
> who, as a sponsor, would be actually uploading the packages so I'll
> be contacting Daniel in the beginning of the next year to organize
> all this.
Two small things you seem to be ignoring:
1. You've s
Package: wnpp
Owner: Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: rubberband
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Chris Cannam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL or Web page : http://www.breakfastquay.com/rubberband/
* License : GPL v2 or above
De
On 22-Dec-07, 10:42 (CST), Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Description : Extension of the python threading api
>
> (will be rewritten in the real package)
I've seen this a several times lately (both explicitly, as here, and
in response to suggestions), and I'd like to speak agains
> > the binary package will have the python- prefix, but that is the
> > intended source package name
> >
> Why not use the same name for both? I think it'd be clearer, and
> has no drawbacks afaics.
On Debian Python Modules Team requested me not to change source
package name from upstream name i
Hi Steve,
> I've seen this a several times lately (both explicitly, as here, and
> in response to suggestions), and I'd like to speak against it: One of
> key points of the ITP is to allow others to correct and/or improve the
> descriptions before initial package upload and before others waste tim
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 18:36:16 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > Shouldn't the package name be something like python-extendable-threading
> > then? i.e. have python- in it?
>
> the binary package will have the python- prefix, but that is the
> intended source package name
>
Why not use the same n
> Shouldn't the package name be something like python-extendable-threading
> then? i.e. have python- in it?
the binary package will have the python- prefix, but that is the
intended source package name
> Also you're not allowed _s.
good catch, I'll call it extended-threading (source) and
pytho
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 05:42:20PM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> * Package name: extended_threading
> Description : Extension of the python threading api
Shouldn't the package name be something like python-extendable-threading
then? i.e. have python- in it? Also you're not allowed _s.
S
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: extended_threading
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : S James S Stapleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
* http://www.var-dev.net/programming/python/extended_threading
* License :
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 08:08:42AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Because of this, I believe it would be a good idea to drop ispell from
the list of standard packages, and the related packages too (i*, w*).
Note that the w* packages provide word lists, which are important to
many programs.
On Saturday December 22 2007 05:04:06 root wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Carl Chenet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: yougrabber
> Version : 0.29.3
> Upstream Author : Quetzy Garcia
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL :
> http://yougrabber.sourcef
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 11:07:18AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 04:23:52PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 02:28:28PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> >
> > > qmail is meant as a replacement for the entire sendmail-binmail system
> > > on typical Interne
On Fr, 21 Dez 2007, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> I have confirmed that rebuilding sawfish with texinfo/4.11.dfsg.1-3
> solves the problem. Rebuilds of the affected packages (but I have no
Yes, the first fix by upstream author Karl Berry was incomplete. I added
another one which should fix t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carl Chenet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: yougrabber
Version : 0.29.3
Upstream Author : Quetzy Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://yougrabber.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description
30 matches
Mail list logo
