Hello,
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 02:02:35PM -0700, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> > I could make no sense out of the second line of the changelog
> > entry. "[The] bug [...] causes screen to switch" seems to be an
> > incomplete sentence. I would have like
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian VDR Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: vdr-plugin-lastfm
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Author : Matthias Feistel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/vdr-lastfm
* License : GPL
Programming
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 02:02:35PM -0700, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:27:04AM -0700, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> > > uploads are signed and that I am just being paranoid!
> > Since the buildd host generates the changelo
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 01:01:06PM -0700, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > If you want features like this, the right thing to do is file
> > wishlist bugs against debbugs or bugs.debian.org instead of
> > complaining on -devel or worse, silen
On 3/16/07, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 01:50:14PM -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> I've seen some posts on debian-devel from a while back which indicates
> some of you (Robert Millan) you've build a kernel using cdbs. I'm
Perhaps I misunderstand, but c
Hello,
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:27:04AM -0700, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> > uploads are signed and that I am just being paranoid!
>
> Since the buildd host generates the changelog entry, it's only natural
> that it's also the buildd host which is
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 01:01:06PM -0700, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le jeudi 15 mars 2007 à 20:34 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez a écrit :
> > > What will a web interface provide that cannot be found/done by browsing
> > > http://bugs.de
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 07:59:02PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > This feature has to be implemented as an add on module to debbugs or
> > entirely separately. It can use the Debbugs:: modules if it must, but
> > it really should pull any informatio
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 15 mars 2007 à 20:34 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez a écrit :
> > What will a web interface provide that cannot be found/done by browsing
> > http://bugs.debian.org/src: ?
>
> A way for us to manage our 1600 bugs?
You can do this by using usertag
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:27:04AM -0700, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On updating my system today I obtained a version of "screen" which
> was a binary-only upload which contained the following changelog
> entry:
>
> screen (4.0.3-0.3+b1) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * Bi
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Tomas Nykung wrote:
The reason I didn't recommend the OP to install Etch is that Etch is not
ready for multimedia out of the box, most importantly there is no real
time enabled kernel in stock Etch, and that is a _must_ when working
with real time audio (latency).
Well, if
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 01:50:14PM -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> I've seen some posts on debian-devel from a while back which indicates
> some of you (Robert Millan) you've build a kernel using cdbs. I'm
Perhaps I misunderstand, but can't you use kernel-package?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto
I've seen some posts on debian-devel from a while back which indicates
some of you (Robert Millan) you've build a kernel using cdbs. I'm
trying to do the same but ran into issues. My kernel is simple though,
no modules, just the kernel. The problem I am running into is I have a
target "kernel" in
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 05:37:25PM +, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 12:34 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > > The simple fact that anyone having submitted a comment to a bug is
> > > automatically added to the CC list for later comments is something that
> > > should be trivial
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 12:34 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > The simple fact that anyone having submitted a comment to a bug is
> > automatically added to the CC list for later comments is something that
> > should be trivial to implement. Instead, we have a bloated and useless
> > subscription
retitle 373213 RFP: libmail-domainkeys-perl -- Perl DomainKeys implementation
noowner 373213
tags 373213 + wontfix
retitle 352653 RFP: libdomainkeys -- DomainKeys reference implementation
noowner 352653
tags 352653 + wontfix
thanks
With DomainKeys being superseded by DKIM, the licensing of libdoma
Hello,
On updating my system today I obtained a version of "screen" which
was a binary-only upload which contained the following changelog
entry:
screen (4.0.3-0.3+b1) unstable; urgency=low
* Binary-only non-maintainer upload for i386; no source changes.
* Rebuild to
I demand that Christian Perrier may or may not have written...
[snip]
> Actually, I'm among the ppl who discourage the use of diff files for PO
> files.
> The various differences in formatting behaviour of the PO editing
> tools, versions of gettext utilities and the like usually generate too
> m
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 08:42:57AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 15 mars 2007 à 20:34 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez a écrit :
> > What will a web interface provide that cannot be found/done by browsing
> > http://bugs.debian.org/src: ?
>
> A way for us to manage our 1600 bugs?
>
> E.g. so
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 08:40:15AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 15 mars 2007 à 20:10 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez a écrit :
> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 12:52:24AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > >
> > > This is true for the initial report. But you also gain something
> > > bugzilla ha
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 08:19:42AM +0100, sean finney wrote:
>
> and wrt the suggestion of "just use webmail" posted later on: this would
> also count as a "web based interface", and imo would be the worst kind
> since you have no automatic information gathering, no input checking,
> and it's rath
(Hope that I'm not breaking the threading, I'm not subscribed to Debian
devel, and if I reply through gmane as I did before, then
debian-custom@lists.debian.org vill not be CC:ed and I'm trying to
respect your wish to CC that list.)
Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Tomas Nykung wrote:
* Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [2007-03-16 15:10 +0100]:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 07:14:27AM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> > ... and just for completeness: x86_64 was the name the Linux kernel people
> > chose for AMD64. I don't know where the term came from, exactly.
>
> Both
The fakechroot project was a rather experiment and the workaround for systems
without root privileges. If you'd like to improve it, please feel free to do
it.
It is hosted on Alioth (and SVN repo at svn://svn.debian.org/fakechroot/), so
I can add more developers to project easly. I'm open for o
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 07:14:27AM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> On Thursday 15 March 2007 20.02:14 Greg Folkert wrote:
> > And for clarity, IA32 cover 32-bit Intel and works for AMD 32-bit
> > processors. IA64 is the Itanium series of processors, amd64 cover the
> > AMD K8/Opteron processors A
> "Thomas" == Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 11:52 +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
>>
>> Try reportbug -u urwid. There is also -u newt, but it doesn't seem to
>> work and has a big warning.
> Any chance of including this information in reportbug's manpage?
* Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-16 20:11]:
> On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 11:52 +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
>
> > Instead of a GUI or a web interface, what I would love to have is a
> > curses-capable version of reportbug. As someone mentioned elsewhere in this
> > thread, browsing wnpp b
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 06:40:43AM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> If you're building packages for Debian, you should use a Debian machine, not
> an Ubuntu machine.
FWIW, you can install cross-distro chroots and use them to build
packages if you need to. Not necessarily recommended for
offici
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sjoerd Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: mission-control
Version : 4.18
* URL : http://mission-control.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Central control for Telepathy connec
Am Freitag, den 16.03.2007, 20:11 +0900 schrieb Paul Wise:
> On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 11:52 +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
>
> > Instead of a GUI or a web interface, what I would love to have is a
> > curses-capable version of reportbug. As someone mentioned elsewhere in this
> > thread, browsing
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 11:52 +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> Instead of a GUI or a web interface, what I would love to have is a
> curses-capable version of reportbug. As someone mentioned elsewhere in this
> thread, browsing wnpp bug report titles in reportbug is a real pain. A
> curses scrol
Hi all,
I am happy to announce a new version of the GNU/kFreeBSD install CD
for both i386 and amd64.
This new version uses a 6.2 kernel instead of a 6.1 one, so that should
make the installer working on recent computers. The other changes are
very small and are mainly an update of all the install
* Anthony Towns [2007-03-16 13:03]:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 10:23:09PM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > A GUI version of reportbug would be nice, though. Having to open a terminal
> > and deal with clumsy line based user interfaces is not a hindrance, but
> > it is an obstacle, to me.
>
> Trie
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> I know this is gonna be flamed down, but I'm feelin' brave today so
> let's try it anyway:
> 4) put an reportbug-ng icon on the desktop by default on every
> fresh installation
> I know this smells like the classic AOL-Button on every Wind
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 07:59:02PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> This feature has to be implemented as an add on module to debbugs or
> entirely separately. It can use the Debbugs:: modules if it must, but
> it really should pull any information it requires using the soap
> interface so it doesn't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jan Michael C. Alonzo) writes:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> A large fraction of bug reports are bad or incomplete, so you need to ensure
>> that you can contact bug submitters for more information.
>>
>> HTTP doesn't give you a callback mechanism, so you nee
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 03:06:33PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I (continue to) object to the notion of web-based submission of bugs to
> Debian. Do you really think that someone who can't maneuver reportbug is
> capable of submitting a useful bug report?
Frankly no (even though the l10n exampl
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 04:14:40PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> It was me that mentioned about the web submission in platform. I would
Sorry for not mentioning you, I frankly forgot to, but even Sam
mentioned that :) Thanks for your interest!
> I also prefer if the student can integrate this fe
38 matches
Mail list logo
