On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 02:02:35PM -0700, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: > On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:27:04AM -0700, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: > > > uploads are signed and that I am just being paranoid!
> > Since the buildd host generates the changelog entry, it's only natural > > that it's also the buildd host which is listed in the changelog entry. > Thanks for the explanation. > There was one other question in my mail. (Sorry! I know I should have split > it up.) > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:27:04AM -0700, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: > > > which contained the following changelog entry: > > > > > > screen (4.0.3-0.3+b1) unstable; urgency=low > > > > > > * Binary-only non-maintainer upload for i386; no source changes. > > > * Rebuild to fix a bug of indeterminate origin that causes screen to > > > switch > > > > > > -- Debian/i386 Build Daemon <buildd_i386-saens> Tue, 6 Mar 2007 > > > 17:06:12 -0600 > > > > > > I saw two somewhat suspicious aspects to this. > > > (a) The second sentence in the changelog appears to be > > > incomplete. > I could make no sense out of the second line of the changelog > entry. "[The] bug [...] causes screen to switch" seems to be an > incomplete sentence. I would have liked to ask the relevant developer > for clarification but I didn't know where to look; which is why I > posted my other question. The result of a misapprehension on my part; I assumed that wanna-build needed explicit newlines in long binNMU descriptions, and wanna-build assumed I trusted it enough to let it reflow the text on its own. The full intended changelog entry was: * Rebuild to fix a bug of indeterminate origin that causes screen to switch from pipes to sockets; addresses bug #413674. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]