On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 02:36:15AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Adam Borowski wrote:
> > The friend muttered something about Ubuntu being as flaky as
> > Windows, then rebooted and started the installation anew...
>
> This is not an Ubuntu mailing list. It's pretty annoying to require all
> us d-
martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.01.2122 +0200]:
>>> Starting RAID device md0 ... 3 drives, done
>>> Starting RAID device md1 ... 3 drives, done
>>> Starting RAID device md2 ... 2/3 drives, degraded
>>> Starting RAID device md3 ... 1/3 drives, failed
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 287 (new: 8)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 83 (new: 10)
Total number of packages request
Adam Borowski wrote:
> The friend muttered something about Ubuntu being as flaky as
> Windows, then rebooted and started the installation anew...
This is not an Ubuntu mailing list. It's pretty annoying to require all
us d-i developers to get this far down in the mail before we realize
that th
martin f krafft wrote:
This release depends heavily on the initramfs-tools dudes fixing
#367567 with their next (>> 0.60) release. In the mean time, you
*can* try mdadm 2.5 by taking a screwdriver and loosening those
screws that make the conflict on initramfs-tools (<= 0.60)
necessary:
Why do
> The command 'debdelta-upgrade' is meant to be run between 'apt-get
> update' and 'apt-get upgrade'; it downloads .debdelta files and
> recreate the new .deb files from them; always using the *installed* old
> version of the .deb, and not the old .deb file itself.
Is it safe - e.g. in case of
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jose Parrella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: assp
Version : 1.2.1
Upstream Author : John Hanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://assp.sf.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : Anti Spam SMT
* Ian Jackson:
> Florian Weimer writes ("Re: use of "invoke-rc.d $PACKAGE stop || exit $?" in
> prerm scripts"):
>> Ian Jackson:
>> > If the old package's prerm fails, dpkg tries the version from the new
>> > package instead, precisely to avoid this problem. See the policy
>> > manual for detail
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 02:44:54AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Matthew R. Dempsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.02.0238 +0200]:
> > > Any suggestions?
> >
> > Submit a feature request to LSB?
>
> And wait 15 years?
Eh, that's only 2 or 3 debian releases from now.
--
To UNSUBSCR
also sprach Matthew R. Dempsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.02.0238 +0200]:
> > Any suggestions?
>
> Submit a feature request to LSB?
And wait 15 years?
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian de
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 06:51:31PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> Any suggestions?
Submit a feature request to LSB?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please unstall callwave
also sprach Arjan Oosting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.01.2307 +0200]:
> It would be nice if the log_action_end_msg would support warnings
> in addition to succes and failures, so the output would clearly
> distinguish a degraded array from a completely succesfully started
> array.
Consider filing
Op do, 01-06-2006 te 22:29 +0200, schreef martin f krafft:
> also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.01.2150 +0200]:
> > Stopping RAID devices... md6 busy; md5 busy; md3 busy; md2 busy; md0
> > busy; md1 busy; failed (6 busy, 1 stopped).
> > Starting RAID devices... md0 running; md
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 01:06:20PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 01:39:30PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> > Method B
>
> > Package: oldpkg
> > Depends: newpkg
> > Files:
> > /usr/share/doc/oldpkg -> /usr/share/doc/newpkg
> > (and nothing else)
>
> > Packag
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 06:51:54PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> In my ideal world, this is what it would look like:
>
> Starting RAID devices ...
> /dev/md0 has been started with 3 drives.
> /dev/md1 has been started with 3 drives.
> /dev/md2 assembled from 2 drives - need all 3 to start
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.01.2150 +0200]:
> Stopping RAID devices... md6 busy; md5 busy; md3 busy; md2 busy; md0
> busy; md1 busy; failed (6 busy, 1 stopped).
> Starting RAID devices... md0 running; md1 running; md2 running; md3
> running; md4 started (3/3); md5 runni
also sprach Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.01.2158 +0200]:
> Starting them individually just seems "better" IMO, more atomic.
Mh, I would have to do config file parsing in the init.d script to
figure out all available devices. mdadm already handles it; it
starts all devices that haven't
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 01:39:30PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:52:53AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > I've heard this stated before, but if it was ever true, it's definitely
> > > > not
> > > > the case with apt (or with britney), and it's not mentioned in policy
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sjoerd Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ruby-gstreamer0.10
Version : 0.0.2
Upstream Author : Sjoerd Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : https://trac.luon.net/ruby-gstreamer0.10
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.01.2012 +0200]:
>> Starting RAID device md0 ... 3 drives, done
>> Starting RAID device md1 ... 3 drives, done
>> Starting RAID device md2 ... 2/3 drives, degraded
>> St
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.01.0240 +0200]:
> I have uploaded mdadm 2.4.1-2 to unstable (should be ready for
> (non-production) use, no *big* changes), and 2.5-1 to experimental
> (*big* changes, works in my case, YMMV).
-3 and -2 are now there, respectively, fixing FT
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.01.2122 +0200]:
> > Starting RAID device md0 ... 3 drives, done
> > Starting RAID device md1 ... 3 drives, done
> > Starting RAID device md2 ... 2/3 drives, degraded
> > Starting RAID device md3 ... 1/3 drives, failed
> > Starting RAID device
#include
* curt manucredo (hansycm) [Fri, May 26 2006, 07:53:58PM]:
> this can lead to this:
> --
> if a patch is available:
>
> 1. look in /var/cache/apt/packages for the package to be updated. if the
> old one is there patch it's files. md5sum. happy? if not...
>
> 2. try
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 08:17:28AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> If absolute trust is the only thing you will accept, then you might as
> well withdraw from Debian project, and go hide in a hole with some
> paranoiod survivalists in Montana. We can't have absolute trust; it
> is impossible. And yo
also sprach Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.01.2012 +0200]:
> Starting RAID device md0 ... 3 drives, done
> Starting RAID device md1 ... 3 drives, done
> Starting RAID device md2 ... 2/3 drives, degraded
> Starting RAID device md3 ... 1/3 drives, failed
> Starting RAID device md4 ...
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: kde-style-klearlook
Version : 0.9.9.2
Upstream Author : Craig Drummond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.kde-look.org/content/show
Florian Weimer writes ("Re: use of "invoke-rc.d $PACKAGE stop || exit $?" in
prerm scripts"):
> Ian Jackson:
> > If the old package's prerm fails, dpkg tries the version from the new
> > package instead, precisely to avoid this problem. See the policy
> > manual for details.
>
> And this doesn't
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 06:51:54PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> In my ideal world, this is what it would look like:
>
> Starting RAID devices ...
> /dev/md0 has been started with 3 drives.
> /dev/md1 has been started with 3 drives.
> /dev/md2 assembled from 2 drives - need all 3 to start
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
martin f krafft wrote:
> > also sprach Andreas Fester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.01.1935 +0200]:
>> >> log_action_msg "Starting RAID devices ..."
> >
> > log_action_msg is supposed to be used to log an atomic message,
> > which is not the case the wa
also sprach Andreas Fester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.01.1935 +0200]:
> log_action_msg "Starting RAID devices ..."
log_action_msg is supposed to be used to log an atomic message,
which is not the case the way we/you use it here.
> log_failure_msg "... done assembling RAID devices: failed."
Acc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
martin f krafft wrote:
> I am faced with the problem on how to tackle multiline output from
> an init.d script, which I have just converted to LSB. Since the
> package is mdadm and RAID is kinda essential to those that have it
> configured, I'd rather
On 6/1/06, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I am faced with the problem on how to tackle multiline output from
an init.d script, which I have just converted to LSB. Since the
package is mdadm and RAID is kinda essential to those that have it
configured, I'd rather not hide informat
Hi,
I am faced with the problem on how to tackle multiline output from
an init.d script, which I have just converted to LSB. Since the
package is mdadm and RAID is kinda essential to those that have it
configured, I'd rather not hide information but give the user the
entire process.
In my ideal w
Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve wondered why people suggest package relationships that cause
> problems during upgrades. I claimed that policy may well be the source
> of the confusion. The fact that you can read different meanings into it
> isn't quite the point. Well, actually i
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The person who I thought was Marting has apparently revealed
> that the identity documents that were preseted to the key signing
> party participants were ones that did not come out of a trusted
> process. Typically, the identity papers ar
Hi all,
debian-flash aims to support the free/open source flash community in a
manner similar to debian-java does for Classpath/GCJ/Kaffe/etc. The
debian flash email list, alioth project, svn repository and wiki pages
are now setup, lets get to work!
free flash community: mainly http://osflash.or
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 03:15:02PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:52:53AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >> It explains Replaces+Conflicts. It does *not* say "create a dummy package
> >> that can't be installed because it depend
On 1 Jun 2006, Frank Küster outgrape:
> To me it rather seems people are talking about how untrustworthy a
> web of trust must necessarily be, especially if you do not take into
> account manually assigned trust values. And you seem to be the
> person who proposes that, when adhering to certain p
Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:52:53AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>>
>> > > > >>Package: oldpkg
>> > > > >>Depends: newpkg
>> > > > >>Description: transitional dummy package
>>
>> > > > >>Package: newpkg
>> > > > >>Replaces: oldpkg
>> > > > >>Conflicts: o
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 02:48:13PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> The person who I thought was Marting has apparently revealed
> that the identity documents that were preseted to the key signing
> party participants were ones that did not come out of a trusted
> process. Typically, th
Scripsit Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Henning Makholm dijo [Wed, May 31, 2006 at 04:10:51AM +0200]:
>> A KSP that depends on there being any pre-existing trust to abuse is
>> *completely worthless* as a KSP whether or not that trust is abused
>> or not.
> Ummm... There is a certain metric of
A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Absolutely true. Look at this
>
> $ ls -s tetex-doc_3.0-17_all.deb tetex-doc_3.0-18_all.deb
> 42388 tetex-doc_3.0-18_all.deb 42340 tetex-doc_3.0-17_all.deb
>
> $ bsdiff tetex-doc_3.0-17_all.deb tetex-doc_3.0-18_all.deb brutal.bsdiff
> $ ls -s brutal.bsdiff
>
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:52:53AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 02:05:13PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 04:12:31PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:22:51AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> > > > Steve Langasek schrieb:
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> unblock 369779 with 366820
Bug#369779: mdadm: [m68k] FTBFS with gcc-4.1
Was blocked by: 366820
Blocking bugs removed: 366820
> block 366820 with 369779
Bug#366820: Transition to GCC
hi
by quite a coincidence, while you people were discussing this idea, I was
already implementing it, in a package called 'debdelta' : see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/05/msg03120.html
Moreover, by some telepathy :-) , I already included features you were
proposing, and addressed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> unblock 369779 with 366820
Bug#369779: mdadm: [m68k] FTBFS with gcc-4.1
Was blocked by: 366820
Blocking bugs removed: 366820
> block 366820 with 369779
Bug#366820: Transition to GCC
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: smcroute
Version : 0.92
Upstream Author : Carsten Schill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.cschill.de/smcroute/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description
Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, this should be a kernel thing as a user might also control this=20
> stuff for a VT.
> There is a framework for LCD backlight in kernel (2.6.16 at least), maybe t=
> his=20
> could be utilized or extended for such stuff?
That would require th
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 02:18:19PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 02:01:19PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > BTW, can you tell me anything about the dip in
> > http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph2-quarter-big.png for m68k? Seems to be
> > heading in the wrong directio
This mostly works for '.deb' files.
# print the archive name and the 'whatis' line of any man pages in it.
dope() { D=$1 ; dpkg-deb -c $D | grep '^-.*man' | while read a b c d e
f ; do echo $f ; done | while read x ; do basename $x ; done | tr . ' ' | while
read a b c ; do L="`ba
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 12:41:52AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 02:48:33PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Then there's the issue of tracing who did an actual upload into the real
> > world. A name on a GPG key is not, by any means, an effective way to do
Indraveni writes...
> I am creating a deb package which will install some type of converter into
> the system and it is working fine. NOW..I want to add an entry into the A
> pplcaitions/Office menu of my debian system for that particular application w
> hich is installed from my deb packa
On Wed, 24 May 2006 02:17:28, Brendan O'Dea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Feel free to raise new bugs on other packages.
The following pair of one-liners might be of use to somebody...
% apropos "manual page for"
cddb-slave2-properties (1) - manual page for Gnome
cddb-slave2-prope
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The person who I thought was Marting has apparently revealed
> that the identity documents that were preseted to the key signing
> party participants were ones that did not come out of a trusted
> process. Typically, the identity papers are
55 matches
Mail list logo
