- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Baumann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Cc: ;
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 9:51 PM
Subject: Package Selection for Debian Live
[ crosspost to live, -devel and -edu; replies please to -devel ]
Hi all,
at the moment, we have two types of Live CD images:
The little Perl script can calculate how heavy a package depends on other
packages and is depended by other packages, they are depicted by
depends_score and rdepends_score.
Another purpose (also my original purpose) is to analyse the changes
in unstable version, so I can know whether it's safe to
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 07:49:34AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > What Martin Krafft showed you was,
>
> How do I know that person actually was Martin Krafft?
So if you have no idea whether or not someone was Martin Krafft, how
can you ask everyone to revoke all signatures for Martin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Mohammed Adnène Trojette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ttf-nafees
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : Center for Research in Urdu Language Processing (CRULP,
http://www.crulp.org/)
* URL : http://www.crulp.org/nafeesWebNaskh.
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 04:12:31PM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Hm, that used to be a "magic" combination that would let dpkg do the
> > right thing.
>
> I've heard this stated before, but if it was ever true, it's definitely not
> the case with apt (or with britney), and
Hi,
thanks for the numerous offers and replies.
I forgot to mention that most (if not all) of these are managed with
git. I don't use dpatch or similar tools - managing patches is the SCM's
job.
The archives mostly are on netz.smurf.noris.de; if "your" package is
not, and you're interested in wo
Scripsit Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Nothing that a general software developer can do to check an
> ID is proof against a determined individual, we all assume that there
> is a gentleman's agreement in place that such an attack is not
> mounted.
If you _really_ believed that
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 12:46:08AM +0200, Fabrice Lorrain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the last 5 months, I encountered twice LCD flat screens without
> hardware control or with half functionnal hardware control.
>
> The proper way to configure those screens was with software through the
> ddc protocol.
Scripsit Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I do agree with Manoj that this was *not* a legitimate experiment (i.e.
> not a "red team" test) and that Martin *did* abuse our [0] trust [1]
A KSP that depends on there being any pre-existing trust to abuse is
*completely worthless*
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 10:32:15AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> I am actually quite ambivalent about whether I think what he did was
>> wrong; I think to determine that I would need to read carefully what
>> the KSP organizers sa
Fabrice Lorrain wrote:
>
> Hi Roberto.
>
> Thanks a lot for the quick answer and your work on this package.
>
> @+,
> Fab
>
No problem.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 17:32:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322762: fixed in vgacardgames 1.3.1-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Roberto C. Sanchez a écrit :
Fabrice Lorrain wrote:
Hi,
In the last 5 months, I encountered twice LCD flat screens without
hardware control or with half functionnal hardware control.
The proper way to configure those screens was with software through the
ddc protocol. The only software I'm aw
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 06:28:32AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Nothing that a general software developer can do to check an
> ID is proof against a determined individual, we all assume that there
> is a gentleman's agreement in place that such an attack is not
> mounted.
I assume n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 30 May 2006 15:09:25 -0700
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 May 2006 14:15, Linas Žvirblis wrote:
> > Paul Johnson wrote:
> > >> See, if you visit a bazaar, I bet a helpful guy with a Russian
> > >> accent can sell you a
Steve Langasek a écrit :
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:50:28PM +0200, Fabrice Lorrain wrote:
What is the current status of nfsv4 in testing.
What can we expect for etch ?
- does people from debian kernel-team follow the current dev (CITI
patch, krb5p support reintroduce in late 2.6.17 etc...) ?
-
On Tuesday 30 May 2006 16:02, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> We are not talking about national security or public safety here, if Martin
> wanted to prove that attacks against KSPs can happen he could have managed
> his attack in an open way (as Manoj said "contact management and get their
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 03:11:23PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 May 2006 14:26, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:57:18PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 30 May 2006 13:02, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > > See, if you visit a bazaar, I bet a helpful guy with
Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is this really a bad thing? He proved that KSP are bad for the web of trust.
> > A legitimate attacker could abuse the KSP just as easilly as Martin, but
> > would result in actual damage, and would most likely not have been caught.
>
>
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:22:51AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> Steve Langasek schrieb:
> >>Package: oldpkg
> >>Depends: newpkg
> >>Description: transitional dummy package
> >>Package: newpkg
> >>Replaces: oldpkg
> >>Conflicts: oldpkg
> >>Description: ...
> >*NO* *NO* *NO* *NO* *NO*. Look clo
Fabrice Lorrain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the last 5 months, I encountered twice LCD flat screens without
> hardware control or with half functionnal hardware control.
>
> The proper way to configure those screens was with software through the
> ddc protocol. The only software I'm aware of working unde
Hi,
In the last 5 months, I encountered twice LCD flat screens without
hardware control or with half functionnal hardware control.
The proper way to configure those screens was with software through the
ddc protocol. The only software I'm aware of working under linux is
ddccontrol [1] which
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:40:39PM -0400, Joe Smith wrote:
> Is this really a bad thing? He proved that KSP are bad for the web of trust.
> A legitimate attacker could abuse the KSP just as easilly as Martin, but
> would result in actual damage, and would most likely not have been caught.
Ask your
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 20:48 +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> * svn-upgrade
>
> Upgrading from a new upstream tarball has never worked here. Matthijs
> Mohlmann and I are maintaining the "pdns" (PowerDNS) package in a
> Subversion repository. That software isn't trivial but it's also no
> rocket scie
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:57:18PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 May 2006 13:02, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:20:14PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > Even the guy at 7-Eleven has the big book of north american ID cards with
> > > pictures and descriptions of wha
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 10:32:15AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> I am actually quite ambivalent about whether I think what he did was
> wrong; I think to determine that I would need to read carefully what
> the KSP organizers said. Martin certainly should follow the protocols
> established,
On Tuesday 30 May 2006 14:15, Linas Žvirblis wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> >> See, if you visit a bazaar, I bet a helpful guy with a Russian accent
> >> can sell you a perfectly valid passport for less than $50. Several
> >> years ago, a friend of mine actually asked someone at the Stadion
> >> 1
On Tuesday 30 May 2006 14:26, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:57:18PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Tuesday 30 May 2006 13:02, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > See, if you visit a bazaar, I bet a helpful guy with a Russian accent
> > > can sell you a perfectly valid passport for le
Eric Cooper wrote:
> I suggest that you provide the same packages that Knoppix does (as long
> as they're free), since Knoppix has been out there with a real user
> community for several years now. No need to reinvent the wheel.
True, but knoppix is i386/amd64 only. Debian Live works on i386/amd6
On 29-May-06, 03:57 (CDT), Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW, libtool scripts are a bit more complex. Unrelated though,
> Libtool records the shell and its features; if you change /bin/sh
> from bash to dash, the installed /usr/bin/libtool will have its
> $echo setting wrong, and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Heikki Henriksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: evolution-jescs
Version : 2.6.2
Upstream Author : Several Authors
* URL : http://www.go-evolution.org/Evolution_JESCS
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description
Michael Fisher wrote:
> Is it posible to have a minimum size image with a WM that can stay
> below 125MB? This would be a great size for USB versions and versions
> running under Qemu or VMWare. Just a thought.
Yes, but those mini-images are separate thing we do anyway (or provide
an easy possibli
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:57:18PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 May 2006 13:02, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > See, if you visit a bazaar, I bet a helpful guy with a Russian accent
> > can sell you a perfectly valid passport for less than $50. Several
> > years ago, a friend of mine actual
Nico Golde wrote:
> Would be useful if you could provide the package lists for
> the two images so we can see whats already included and send
> you patches.
The small one contains the standard system only, means, packages which
have Priority: standard and nothing more. That's about 80MB (the ima
This one time, at band camp, Paul Johnson said:
> On Tuesday 30 May 2006 13:02, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > See, if you visit a bazaar, I bet a helpful guy with a Russian
> > accent can sell you a perfectly valid passport for less than $50.
> > Several years ago, a friend of mine actually asked someon
Paul Johnson wrote:
>> See, if you visit a bazaar, I bet a helpful guy with a Russian accent
>> can sell you a perfectly valid passport for less than $50. Several
>> years ago, a friend of mine actually asked someone at the Stadion
>> 10-lecia in Warsaw, and was led to a guy with a number of blan
Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Falk Hueffner a écrit :
> >> Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >>>On arm, ia64 and alpha the glibc fails to build with gcc-4.1.
> >> On Alpha the problem is:
> >> {standard input}: Assembler messages:
> >> {sta
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:29:34PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> * gnulib
> (easy pickings; need to package new Upstream from CVS, every month or so)
I ported quite a lot of C software between IRIX/SunOS/AIX/Linux, so
I'll take it.
> * tcng
> (some clean-up required)
I have some idea about
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 02:50:16PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:05:26PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Timeline
> >
> > Now, let's please take a more detailed look at the time line:
> > Thu 15 Jun 06:
> > last chance to switch to gcc 4.1, pyth
Christoph Haas wrote:
>
> Yes, of course. Besides some minor things I don't quite like about
> Subversion (merging looks like black magic for me and getting out old
> revisions of a file means typing the full URL for no reason) these are
> the actual problems I encountered with svn-buildpackage:
>
On Tuesday 30 May 2006 13:02, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:20:14PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > Even the guy at 7-Eleven has the big book of north american ID cards with
> > pictures and descriptions of what makes a real one for when they
> > encounter an ID that they've neve
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Falk Hueffner a écrit :
>> Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>>On arm, ia64 and alpha the glibc fails to build with gcc-4.1.
>> On Alpha the problem is:
>> {standard input}: Assembler messages:
>> {standard input}:341: Error: macro requires
wrote:
> * gnulib
> (easy pickings; need to package new Upstream from CVS, every month or so)
I'll take that.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To
On 5/30/06, Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ crosspost to live, -devel and -edu; replies please to -devel ]
Hi all,
at the moment, we have two types of Live CD images:
* the small one which contains only packages of standard priority,
* and three larger ones, each of which conta
Is it posible to have a minimum size image with a WM that can stay
below 125MB? This would be a great size for USB versions and versions
running under Qemu or VMWare. Just a thought.
desNotes
On 5/30/06, Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ crosspost to live, -devel and -edu; replies ple
Hi,
* Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-30 22:19]:
> [ crosspost to live, -devel and -edu; replies please to -devel ]
> at the moment, we have two types of Live CD images:
>
> * the small one which contains only packages of standard priority,
> * and three larger ones, each of which
Falk Hueffner a écrit :
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On arm, ia64 and alpha the glibc fails to build with gcc-4.1.
On Alpha the problem is:
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:341: Error: macro requires $at register while noat in effect
{standard input}:374
[ crosspost to live, -devel and -edu; replies please to -devel ]
Hi all,
at the moment, we have two types of Live CD images:
* the small one which contains only packages of standard priority,
* and three larger ones, each of which contains one of the common
desktop-environments on it (gn
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 08:48:14PM +0200, I (Christoph Haas) wrote:
> * svn-inject
>
> Injecting new packages through svn-inject fails here. I get errors about
> the MKCOL method not being allowed on the remote WebDAV server. Perhaps
> it's a problem that the Apache runs on Sarge while I'm develop
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:20:14PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Even the guy at 7-Eleven has the big book of north american ID cards with
> pictures and descriptions of what makes a real one for when they encounter an
> ID that they've never seen before. Surely Debian can do as well as the guy
* Andreas Fester [Tue, 30 May 2006 21:42:27 +0200]:
> One last question: would it be safe to say
> Architecture: all
> in the dummy transition package since it does not contain
> any architecture specific files anymore, or is it better to
> leave it as it is with "Architecture: any" to create
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks for all your answers, my package successfully transformed
to its new name with apt-get dist-upgrade in my test environment :-)
One last question: would it be safe to say
Architecture: all
in the dummy transition package since it does not cont
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On arm, ia64 and alpha the glibc fails to build with gcc-4.1.
On Alpha the problem is:
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:341: Error: macro requires $at register while noat in effect
{standard input}:374: Error: macro requires $at
also sprach Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.30.2120 +0200]:
> Even the guy at 7-Eleven has the big book of north american ID cards with
> pictures and descriptions of what makes a real one for when they encounter an
> ID that they've never seen before. Surely Debian can do as well as t
On Tuesday 30 May 2006 10:40, Joe Smith wrote:
> But Martin decided to publish this experiment.
> Is this really a bad thing? He proved that KSP are bad for the web of
> trust.
Isn't what Martin and this thread actually demonstrated is that signing keys
based on IDs you cannot reasonably authent
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:45:10PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Christoph Haas wrote:
> >
> > I'm currently looking into several systems. Usually I use Subversion and
> > svn-buildpackage but due to a lot of trouble with svn-buildpackage I
> > have moved away from repositories for my Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (gmane.linux.debian.devel.general) you wrote:
> On (29/05/06 21:29), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
>> * gnutls, gcrypt, libtasn1, libksba
>> (security-critical, some work required, having a team for these
>> packages
also sprach Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.30.2002 +0200]:
> Personally, I'm especially worried about the developers who were
> taken in by the Transnational Republic ID. So, can we have
> a "fess up" time now? Manoj, did you sign the key on this basis?
He did not.
--
Please
also sprach Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.30.1920
+0200]:
> I do agree with Manoj that this was *not* a legitimate experiment (i.e.
> not a "red team" test) and that Martin *did* abuse our [0] trust [1]
I acknowledge this and would like to apologise to everyone.
My
"Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, if KSPs are not changed, then the Web of trust becomes
> effectively worthless. Manoj should be far more concerned about
> that, then about Martin's demonstration of this.
Personally, I'm especially worried about the developers who were taken
in by t
Dear Debian Devel,
Im personally emailing you today to discuss a partnership. I noticed
that your web site debian.org has linked to Tel3. Pingo is a virtual
VoIP calling card service that helps the world save on there long
distance and international calls.
I'm sending you this invitation to
Christoph Haas wrote:
>
> I'm currently looking into several systems. Usually I use Subversion and
> svn-buildpackage but due to a lot of trouble with svn-buildpackage I
> have moved away from repositories for my Debian packages lately.
>
Out of curiousity, what problems have you encountered with
"Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Claiming that what Martin did was good since he was showing something
useful
for our community is equivalent to saying it was a "red team attack".
Nobody
used that term explicitly probably because t
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Claiming that what Martin did was good since he was showing
> something useful for our community is equivalent to saying it was a
> "red team attack". Nobody used that term explicitly probably because
> they are unfamiliar with it. I kno
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:28:19AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This is to forestall those of you who seem to be be arguing
> > that the debconf6 KSP crack was a red team attack -- here is how that
> > attack differed from a legit
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:46:30AM -0700, Zak B. Elep wrote:
> >* libdigest-hmac-perl, libdigest-sha1-perl, libdigest-md2-perl,
> > libdigest-perl, libio-interface-perl, libio-socket-multicast-perl,
> > libnet-xwhois-perl, libvideo-capture-v4l-perl
> I'd like to take these up.
Oops, I just saw yo
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Based on this thread, I would think that Stave Langasek was
> dead on: any transitive trust in Debian's keyring is
> non-existenet. So, using the signed key as a mesure of trust in the
> identity of a NM candidate by the DAMS is probably mi
On 30 May 2006, Frank Küster verbalised:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What Martin Krafft showed you was,
How do I know that person actually was Martin Krafft?
>>>
>>> This is getting ridiculuous.
>>
>> With this I tend to agree. Your credulity is unbelievable.
On Mon, 29 May 2006 21:29:34 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Unknown) said:
> * ufraw (need to package new Upstream; easy)
I can take this if nobody else wants it.
--
Hubert Chan - email & Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.uhoreg.ca/
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA (Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:29:34PM +0200, wrote:
> * libdigest-hmac-perl, libdigest-sha1-perl, libdigest-md2-perl,
> libdigest-perl, libio-interface-perl, libio-socket-multicast-perl,
> libnet-xwhois-perl, libvideo-capture-v4l-perl
> (easy pickings; check for new Upstream)
I guess these pa
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is to forestall those of you who seem to be be arguing
> that the debconf6 KSP crack was a red team attack -- here is how that
> attack differed from a legitimate red team effort (I have been a
> member of red teams before, and have le
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I guess You can't read. I have never stated that I know it is
> a forgery: I can't since I do not have that data. I have stated I
> have absolutely no trust path to the identity proclaimed, so I am
> going to treat it as though it were; s
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I claim to be president George Clooney, and show you a
> document that proves I am such, and I earnestly claim it was not
> forged, but Bubba looked at all kinds of documentation that says I am
> such a person, you would proclaim from th
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I really think either you are deliberately being obtuse, or
> nothing I can say will get this through to you. I fail to see how
> one can assert that there was no forgery going on -- do you
> automatically assume that if a shiney laminated
Christoph Haas wrote:
Darcs looks like a nice competitor but has some issues regarding
checking in changes automatically (might as well be my ignorance but it
sounds like I need weird scripts and a .procmailrc to merge changes
automatically).
You don't *need* them; you can choose to do that, bu
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 04:44:49PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >I tried it on akire, but was interrupted by real world issues.
> >When you could give a more detailed HowTo (sbuild, dpkg-buildpackage,
> >whatever) I would retry...
> Very easy:
> dget http://people.debian.org/~aurel32/glibc/gli
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What Martin Krafft showed you was,
>>>
>>> How do I know that person actually was Martin Krafft?
>>
>> This is getting ridiculuous.
>
> With this I tend to agree. Your credulity is unbelievable.
>
>> If what I've read about the incident is
Manoj,
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:52:11AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> This is to forestall those of you who seem to be be arguing
> that the debconf6 KSP crack was a red team attack -- here is how that
> attack differed from a legitimate red team effort (I have been a
> member of r
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libdata-dump-perl
Version : 1.06
Upstream Author : Gisle Aas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://mirrors.kernel.org/cpan/modules/by-module/Data/Data-Dump-1.06.tar.g
Hie Gonéri and *,
Am 2006-05-19 12:26:23, schrieb Gonéri Le Bouder:
> > However, another solution would be just place these JPGs and PNGs flat
> > on the server and have apt just download them and save them
> Yes, a public repository where people download the picture when they need it.
This was m
Hi,
This is to forestall those of you who seem to be be arguing
that the debconf6 KSP crack was a red team attack -- here is how that
attack differed from a legitimate red team effort (I have been a
member of red teams before, and have lead a number of red team
attacks in my time).
On 30 May 2006, Frank Küster told this:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 30 May 2006, Wouter Verhelst spake thusly:
>>
>>> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 06:28:32AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On 28 May 2006, Thomas Bushnell stated:
> Perhaps my just-posted message has to
Ingo Juergensmann a écrit :
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 04:31:33PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
I haven't done a build on m68k yet.
I tried it on akire, but was interrupted by real world issues.
When you could give a more detailed HowTo (sbuild, dpkg-buildpackage,
whatever) I would retry...
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 04:31:33PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I haven't done a build on m68k yet.
I tried it on akire, but was interrupted by real world issues.
When you could give a more detailed HowTo (sbuild, dpkg-buildpackage,
whatever) I would retry...
--
Ciao...//
Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
Hi all,
As gcc-4.1 may be the default compiler soon (I hope so), I have tried to
build the glibc with it.
Currently it builds and works on the following architectures:
amd64, hppa, i386, mips, mipsel, sparc
The packages are available [1], but a but outdated. It shoul
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 08:50:41AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On 30 May 2006, Wouter Verhelst stated:
[...]
> > However, "trusted processes" do not lie with people who are trying
> > to convince you of their identity. If you trust anyone to tell the
> > truth about their identity, which is wh
On 30 May 2006, Wouter Verhelst stated:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 07:49:34AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On 30 May 2006, Wouter Verhelst spake thusly:
>>
>>> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 06:28:32AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On 28 May 2006, Thomas Bushnell stated:
> Perhaps my just-p
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 10:09:07AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Christoph Haas schrieb:
> >
> >>>* NTP server
> >>> (some work required; currently, not-really-maintained by the Debian
> >>> NTP Team, which consists of zero active mem
People, please move this thread over to -project
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 10:13:37AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:04:29AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> >> [Benjamin Seidenberg]
> >> > FYI:
> >> > 12:33 < Ganneff> an
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:04:29AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>>
>> [Benjamin Seidenberg]
>> > FYI:
>> > 12:33 < Ganneff> and for all those impatient waiting for NEW: i will
>> > clear that in my jetlag time, in those nights i
Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Christoph Haas schrieb:
>
>>>* NTP server
>>> (some work required; currently, not-really-maintained by the Debian
>>> NTP Team, which consists of zero active members)
>
>> I'd take my chance on this one. There is a large number of bugs open and
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 30 May 2006, Wouter Verhelst spake thusly:
>
>> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 06:28:32AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>> On 28 May 2006, Thomas Bushnell stated:
Perhaps my just-posted message has too many words to see my point.
In the pa
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 07:49:34AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On 30 May 2006, Wouter Verhelst spake thusly:
>
> > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 06:28:32AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> On 28 May 2006, Thomas Bushnell stated:
> >>> Perhaps my just-posted message has too many words to see my p
On 30 May 2006, Wouter Verhelst spake thusly:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 06:28:32AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On 28 May 2006, Thomas Bushnell stated:
>>> Perhaps my just-posted message has too many words to see my point.
>>>
>>> In the paragraph above, marked >>>, which was written by you,
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:05:26PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Timeline
>
>
> Now, let's please take a more detailed look at the time line:
>
>
> Thu 15 Jun 06:
>
> last chance to switch to gcc 4.1, python 2.4
> review architectures one more time
> last
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:57:04AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Whether doing it this way is a good idea, though, I don't know. Buildd
> > surely wasn't designed for this.
>
> It is much simpler than to set up wanna-build and a local archive
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:04:29AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> [Benjamin Seidenberg]
> > FYI:
> > 12:33 < Ganneff> and for all those impatient waiting for NEW: i will
> > clear that in my jetlag time, in those nights i
> > cant sleep (ie 1st -> 2nd june,
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 06:28:32AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On 28 May 2006, Thomas Bushnell stated:
> > Perhaps my just-posted message has too many words to see my point.
> >
> > In the paragraph above, marked >>>, which was written by you, you
> > speak of deception and forgery. Nothing i
On 27 May 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane verbalised:
> On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 05:19:21PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On 27 May 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane spake thusly:
>>> On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 02:04:31PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On 27 May 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane stated:
>
> The U
On 30 May 2006, at 12:50, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Hi!
Sorry for late response.
* "Nikita V. Youshchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-24 12:10]:
However, contrary to what the NM templates suggest, symbol
versioning
is not a cure-all for all ABI incompatibilities. If libetpan
return
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
